<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybach to Build $1.35 Million 62S Landaulet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/01/maybach-to-build-135-million-62s-landaulet.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/01/maybach-to-build-135-million-62s-landaulet.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: debapratim nandy</title>
		<link>http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/01/maybach-to-build-135-million-62s-landaulet.html/comment-page-1#comment-32318</link>
		<dc:creator>debapratim nandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.autoguide.com/auto-news/?p=298#comment-32318</guid>
		<description>The Maybach Laundalet is definitely elevating the rear seat experience for limos....but questions should be raised for safety considering the retractable soft top,as it would not provide the required roll-over protection in case of an accident,whereas a retractable hard-top would have fared better in areas concerning safety, it would have provided a mammoth engineering hurdle....also design wise it looks and feels a lot like the 62S its based upon which it shouldn&#039;t have considering exclusivity and the price-tag it commands.
Moreover Maybach alongwith Mercedes should have really moved over from its AirmaticDC considering the fact that its an old design and the Active Body Control in the S-Class fares much better when it comes to performance without sacrificing luxury. With Maybach streching the length of the Landaulet it should really have given it 4 wheel steer, a version of which does service in the BMW 7-series which again would have had an added impact on its handling mainly body-roll.
Again since its tailor made to be chauffeur driven and safety is of paramount importance it should have had employed Mercedes&#039; 4Matic four wheel drive system which while enhancing traction would have added a zest in its performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Maybach Laundalet is definitely elevating the rear seat experience for limos&#8230;.but questions should be raised for safety considering the retractable soft top,as it would not provide the required roll-over protection in case of an accident,whereas a retractable hard-top would have fared better in areas concerning safety, it would have provided a mammoth engineering hurdle&#8230;.also design wise it looks and feels a lot like the 62S its based upon which it shouldn&#8217;t have considering exclusivity and the price-tag it commands.<br />
Moreover Maybach alongwith Mercedes should have really moved over from its AirmaticDC considering the fact that its an old design and the Active Body Control in the S-Class fares much better when it comes to performance without sacrificing luxury. With Maybach streching the length of the Landaulet it should really have given it 4 wheel steer, a version of which does service in the BMW 7-series which again would have had an added impact on its handling mainly body-roll.<br />
Again since its tailor made to be chauffeur driven and safety is of paramount importance it should have had employed Mercedes&#8217; 4Matic four wheel drive system which while enhancing traction would have added a zest in its performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

