<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chevy Drops Hybrid Malibu From Lineup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/06/chevy-drops-hybrid-malibu-from-lineup.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/06/chevy-drops-hybrid-malibu-from-lineup.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:11:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/06/chevy-drops-hybrid-malibu-from-lineup.html/comment-page-1#comment-18806</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/?p=4518#comment-18806</guid>
		<description>The 2009 Mailbu Hybrid is rated 26/34 MPG NOT 24/32..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2009 Mailbu Hybrid is rated 26/34 MPG NOT 24/32..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colum Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/06/chevy-drops-hybrid-malibu-from-lineup.html/comment-page-1#comment-14198</link>
		<dc:creator>Colum Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/?p=4518#comment-14198</guid>
		<description>You are definitely right on the Fusion Hybrid. As for the Malibu, also technically correct. It appears as though there are many MPG numbers from GM for the Malibu 4-Cyl. Corrections have been made. (Thanks for keeping us on our toes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are definitely right on the Fusion Hybrid. As for the Malibu, also technically correct. It appears as though there are many MPG numbers from GM for the Malibu 4-Cyl. Corrections have been made. (Thanks for keeping us on our toes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter mckinley</title>
		<link>http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/06/chevy-drops-hybrid-malibu-from-lineup.html/comment-page-1#comment-14015</link>
		<dc:creator>peter mckinley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/?p=4518#comment-14015</guid>
		<description>I never respond to stuff like this, but if you go through length&#039;s of reporting mileage, I&#039;d make sure you are accurate. I think you have the fusion number flipped, city number should be 41 I think, and I own a 6sp 4 cylinder  malibu and it does 22 city, 33 highway, again little details but you are reporting facts right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never respond to stuff like this, but if you go through length&#8217;s of reporting mileage, I&#8217;d make sure you are accurate. I think you have the fusion number flipped, city number should be 41 I think, and I own a 6sp 4 cylinder  malibu and it does 22 city, 33 highway, again little details but you are reporting facts right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
