<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 International Engine of the Year Winners Announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/07/2009-international-engine-of-the-year-winners-announced.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/07/2009-international-engine-of-the-year-winners-announced.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:11:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: João Prates</title>
		<link>http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/07/2009-international-engine-of-the-year-winners-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-24344</link>
		<dc:creator>João Prates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/?p=5248#comment-24344</guid>
		<description>The results for Engine of the Year Awards 2009 should be subjected to severe auditing from independent sources.

I will only name 1 category where the results are simply outrageous to an extent far beyond comprehension: The Green Engine award.

The jury had several cars to choose from, and two nominees were the VW TSI and the new Prius 3G (3rd generation).

Having:

The VW with 174 hp, 6.2 L/100 km and 144 g/km CO2;
The Toyota with 136 hp, 3.9 L/100 km and 89 g/km CO2

The jury says the car which has:

+30% horsepower, 63% more fuel consumption, 62% more CO2 emissions

is the greenest car... yeah... right... is this for real!?!?!

The general public demands a general inquiry to this Jury votes right now!

This is a shameful representation of how strong lobbies can go.
I feel sick to the stomach reading this year&#039;s awards.

Shame on the jury!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The results for Engine of the Year Awards 2009 should be subjected to severe auditing from independent sources.</p>
<p>I will only name 1 category where the results are simply outrageous to an extent far beyond comprehension: The Green Engine award.</p>
<p>The jury had several cars to choose from, and two nominees were the VW TSI and the new Prius 3G (3rd generation).</p>
<p>Having:</p>
<p>The VW with 174 hp, 6.2 L/100 km and 144 g/km CO2;<br />
The Toyota with 136 hp, 3.9 L/100 km and 89 g/km CO2</p>
<p>The jury says the car which has:</p>
<p>+30% horsepower, 63% more fuel consumption, 62% more CO2 emissions</p>
<p>is the greenest car&#8230; yeah&#8230; right&#8230; is this for real!?!?!</p>
<p>The general public demands a general inquiry to this Jury votes right now!</p>
<p>This is a shameful representation of how strong lobbies can go.<br />
I feel sick to the stomach reading this year&#8217;s awards.</p>
<p>Shame on the jury!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Bimm</title>
		<link>http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2009/07/2009-international-engine-of-the-year-winners-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-20514</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Bimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/?p=5248#comment-20514</guid>
		<description>Although in company of Royalty, that Porsche flat engine is without question the leader of the pack. A thing of beauty to treat with clean gloves never allowing it to get dirty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although in company of Royalty, that Porsche flat engine is without question the leader of the pack. A thing of beauty to treat with clean gloves never allowing it to get dirty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
