Wireless Charging of Electric Vehicles is the Future Say Experts

4
Wireless Charging of Electric Vehicles is the Future Say Experts

Wireless-induction charging of vehicles and plug-in hybrids is likely to become common within the automotive industry say EV experts. “We believe it’s not a matter of if but when wireless charging will be in all (electric) vehicles,” Laura Marino of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory stated during a recent Automotive Power Electronics conference.

Inductive charging will become very popular strictly because of convenience. With this type of charging, one would not have to remember to plug in the car after use. Inductive charging sends electricity wirelessly between two coils. One coil would remain inside the car while the other could be hidden under a garage floor or city street.

What makes induction charging so convenient is that charging points can be built into roads close to stop signs. Furthermore, the Logan Airport in Boston will implement the technology into shuttling travelers to and from car rental agencies. The induction chargers will be embedded into areas where buses wait for passengers. This allows the bus to charge while waiting for more passengers.

In Europe, the automotive industry has not yet agreed on a standard for plugs. The development of electronic vehicles relies on the cost of infrastructure meaning low cost production is of importance. Renault is arguing for a system based on alternating current. This will hopefully lower the cost of building charging points. Some estimates predict a direct- current fast charge point would cost $70,000.

[Source: WardsAuto]

  • Sam Brown

    The Solyndra case proves that the DOE LOAN and ATVM funding was based on pure bribery and lobby manipulation. All of the failure points on Solyndra have been visible for ages so they would not have gotten the money if “real due diligence” had been performed instead of giving the money away to hard-wired campaign contributors.

    Kleiner Perkins put Chu in office as Secratary in order to get favored nations funding for their portfolio companies and keep competitors to those portfolio companies from getting funded. Steve Westly and Kholsa helped them along with Raj Gupta.

    Detroit’s lobbyists said,” we can’t get you any more taxpayer money because the public knows we are liars” “Tell them we need the money to build electric cars- and then we can BS them into coughing it up” said the lobbyists. The law said that the money was to go to any American car company but it only went to a Japanese company and Detroit. (Tesla is now controlled by Detroit no matter what crap Elon foists off so don’t say they are not part of it.) The Detroit News writes that Detroit & Telsa recipients used the money to pay bonuses to staff and other uses, have parties and other uses not intended for the funds.

    The DOE ATVM And Loan Gaurantee programs were conducted by criminals in order to commit crimes. The “Car Czar” Steve Rattner (Now a proven criminal by the State of NY), Lachland Seward, Matt Rogers and his partner Steve Spinner and most of Tesla’s friends at McKinsey Consulting from Silicon Valley (Who used Tax payer jets to fly back and forth to Silicon Valley to go bike riding), Steve Westley and a group who now left DOE, and some who are still there are criminals. They stole your tax money and put in their friends pockets. Federal investigations have already shown that Detroit embezzeled and misspent the first monies distributed. Every company that has so far gotten money has misspent it, did not have what they said they had at the time they applied, were tied to campaign contributions and rated lowest on the comparison reviews. If you google: “Unprofessional behavior plagues SRS” to read about the death threats, you can see the depths to which some of these people will sink. See the recent mass exodus from DOE of key staff in the last 9 months: They took the money and ran.

    The few applicants that did get money spent tens of millions of dollars on bribes and lobby “incentives” equal in ratio to the money they got. Now the White House says that $17B of the taxpayer money that Detroit got is a write-off and is lost forever. In other words Detroit has already embezzeled more money than all of the other applicants applied for put together.

    Google Tesla’s Siry on “DOE stifles innovation” to read what one of the highest level staff at one of the car companies said.

    The GAO, a federal crime busting agency, just released public reports saying that the DOE Loan programs were corrupt. All of the people under Seward were “connected” or “made men” in the Detroit cadre. Seward changed the section 136 first-come-first serve rule (Which appears to be illegal) in order to provide advantages to his friends in Detroit who didnt bother to apply in time and to cut out the smaller players who were already ahead in the application proces

    Subpeonas of Detroit and DOE Loan Departments will prove crime, corruption, favoritism and rigged contracts were the rule and not the exception.

  • Robert Gnorsen

    Sam, your glib lies belie your extreme right wing views. None of what you said about Solyndra is true. The Bush admin., after several years of due diligence,looked favorably on Solyndra’s loan guarantee (note: not a loan; the money had to be borrowed on the market), but did not formally approve it because the money Bush set aside for alternate energy went to the oil companies. No one involved with the founding of Solyndra gave money to the Obama campaign. There was no bribery or lobbying. All was done through the DOE program set up by Bush. These are all researchable facts. When you speak do so after doing due diligence yourself on the issues. Shame for spreading lies!

  • Brad Pratt

    Sam – Read below:

    Today Rep. Henry A. Waxman, Ranking Member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and Rep. Diana DeGette, Ranking Member of the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, wrote a letter to Chairman Cliff Stearns in regard to his recent public comments about the Department of Energy’s loan guarantee program for renewable energy projects.

    The text of the letter is below and can be downloaded here.

    April 11, 2011

    The Honorable Cliff Stearns
    Chairman
    Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
    House Committee on Energy and Commerce
    2125 Rayburn House Office Building
    Washington, DC 20515
    Dear Chairman Stearns:

    We are writing in regard to your recent public comments about the Department of Energy’s loan guarantee program for renewable energy projects. You are quoted in a March 30, 2011, Center for Public Integrity article as saying: “A lot of these contracts are really being pushed out the door with no oversight. … I think what happens is, they give some of this money out to people who are either contributors or strong supporters.” [1] In an ABCNews.com story, you further stated: “I think in the long term we have to worry about the United States government guaranteeing loans for businesses based perhaps upon favoritism.”[2]

    The focus of your comments appears to be a loan guarantee provided to a solar energy company, Solyndra, Inc. On February 17, 2011, you and Chairman Upton sent a letter to the Department of Energy (DOE) requesting documents and information relating to DOE’s loan guarantee award to Solyndra, as well as a briefing on the loan guarantee program.

    In response to your request, the Committee has received extensive information from DOE. DOE has already produced approximately 10,000 pages of documents to the Committee and continues to produce documents on an on-going basis. Committee staff has also received two briefings from DOE relating to both the loan guarantee program and the Solyndra loan guarantee specifically, as well as one briefing from DOE’s Inspector General (DOE-IG) relating to its review of the program. Additional staff briefings relating to this inquiry are expected.

    Based on our review of the information provided to the Committee to date, we do not understand the factual basis for your disparaging public comments. We have not received any information or documents that suggest any impropriety, wrongdoing, or favoritism in the award of the Solyndra loan guarantee or any other DOE loan guarantee.

    DOE officials have described for the Committee the loan guarantees it has issued and the peer-reviewed, merit-based process by which they are awarded. In the case of Solyndra, DOE awarded a loan guarantee for the construction of a full-scale production plant that could build innovative photovoltaic solar panels capable of producing 210 megawatts of clean electricity each year. According to DOE, this manufacturing facility was constructed on time and under budget and has a greater production capacity than originally proposed (300 megawatts). Solyndra directly employs 300 more Americans today than it did when DOE agreed to provide the loan guarantee in March 2009. And, Solyndra has obtained additional equity investments from existing equity holders, an indication of investor confidence in the company’s prospects.

    A recent DOE-IG audit of the loan guarantee program does not support claims of waste, fraud, abuse, or political favoritism relating to any of DOE’s loan guarantees. The report focused on issues relating to document and records management. It did not cast any doubt on the propriety of any loan guarantee decisions.

    If you have additional information to support your claims of political favoritism relating to any of DOE’s loan guarantees, including the Solyndra loan guarantee, we request that you share this information with us.

    Sincerely,

    Henry A. Waxman Diana DeGette
    Ranking Member Ranking Member
    Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations

    cc: The Honorable Fred Upton
    Chairman
    Committee on Energy and Commerce

  • ulrich lange

    Induction charging is a very lossy process compared to plug-in charging. A loss in efficiency of 25%-30% is normal. For a toothbush that’s OK because we are talking about a few micro watts. And the toothbrush is charged for 8 hours before you use it again for 2 minutes. For cars it’s a little different. We are taking real amperage. So even a 10% loss in efficiency would be unacceptable.

« Back

SWEEPSTAKES – OFFICIAL RULES, TERMS AND CONDITIONS

 

AutoGuide.com’s Continental Control Sport Tires Giveaway – By subscribing to the AutoGuide.com Newsletter, Entrants are eligible to win four (4) Continental ControlContact Sport AS Tires, or four (4) Continental Control/Contact Tour AS Tires, sponsored by Discount Tire (value of $900.00 USD). One (1) winner will be chosen at random and contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff.

 

  1. NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT OF ANY KIND IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN THIS SWEEPSTAKES. AGE/RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS, VOID WHERE PROHIBITED.

 

  1. PRIZE:One (1) Winner will be randomly selected to each receive:four (4) Continental ControlContact Sport AS Tires, or four (4) Continental Control/Contact Tour AS Tires from Discount Tire (the “Prize Supplier”). Total approximate retail value of all prizes is approximately $900.00 USD. Prizes are not transferable and no cash or prize substitution is allowed. Prize package is awarded “as is” with no warranty or guarantee, either express or implied.

 

  1. ELIGIBILITY: From the time of entry through the final date of prize fulfillment, each contest entrant and selected entrant must be a permanent lawful citizen and resident residing in the 50 United States or the District of Columbia, and be twenty one (21) years of age or older.VOID IN PUERTO RICO, THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, IN ALL FOREIGN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ALL OTHER U.S. TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS AND WHERE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. Employees, officers, directors, agents and representatives, of the Sponsor and the Prize Supplier and each of their respective parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, promotion partners and any entity involved in the development, production,  implementation, administration or fulfillment of this Sweepstakes, and the immediate family members (e.g., spouse, mother, father, sister, brother, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, grandparent, in-law, daughter and son, regardless of where they live) and persons living in the same household (whether or not related) of such individuals are not eligible to participate or win. Only one selected entrant per household. All decisions of the Sponsor with respect to this sweepstakes are final. The Sponsor shall have the right at any time to require proof of identity and failure to provide such proof may result in disqualification from the Sweepstakes.

 

  1. ENTER BY INTERNET:Beginning on Monday, August 1st, 2016, you may enter this sweepstakes via the Internet by logging onto AutoGuide.com and subscribing to the Newsletter.

 

  1. SELECTION OF WINNER:One (1) entrant will be selected on or about August 13th, 2016 by random selection of entrants who have subscribed to the AutoGuide.com Newsletter. The winner will be contacted directly by a representative of Sponsor via email. The winner will be required to provide a mailing address (that is not a P.O. box) to receive the prize which will be shipped free of charge.

 

  1. ODDS OF WINNING:Odds of winning a prize are determined by the total number of eligible entries received.

 

  1. RESTRICTIONS:The prize package consists of four (4) Continental ControlContact Sport AS Tires, or four (4) Continental Control/Contact Tour AS Tires from Discount Tire approximately valued at $900.00 USD.  If prize cannot be awarded due to circumstances beyond the control of the Sponsor or Prize Supplier, no substitute prize will be awarded due to the unique nature of the prize. Sponsor and Prize Supplier shall not be liable to the winner or any person claiming through winner for failure to supply the prize or any part thereof, by reason of any acts of God, any action(s), regulation(s), order(s) or request(s) by any governmental or quasi-governmental entity (whether or not the action(s), regulations(s), order(s) or request(s) prove(s) to be invalid), equipment failure, utility failure, internet failure, terrorist acts, threatened terrorist acts, air raid, blackout, act of public enemy, earthquake, war (declared or undeclared), fire, flood, epidemic, explosion, unusually severe weather, hurricane, embargo, labor dispute or strike (whether legal or illegal) labor or material shortage, transportation interruption of any kind, work slow-down, civil disturbance, insurrection, riot, or any other cause beyond Sponsor’s or Prize Supplier’s control (collectively, “Force Majeure Event”). Sponsor shall not be responsible for any cancellations, delays, diversions or substitutions or any act or omissions whatsoever by the performers/events, other transportation companies or any other persons providing any of these services and accommodations to passengers including any results thereof such as changes in services or accommodations necessitated by same.

 

  1. CONDITIONS:By entering the Sweepstakes, entrants agree to be bound by the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions and that Sponsor has the irrevocable right to use in perpetuity entrants’ names, user names, likenesses, photographs, voices, home mailing address, biographical and prize information, and entry materials, without notice to entrants and without compensation or obligation, in any and all media now or hereafter known throughout the world, in any manner whatsoever, to advertise and promote Sponsor, its products and services, the Sweepstakes, and for any other purpose except where prohibited by law. Entrant waives the right to assert as a cost of winning a prize any and all costs of verification and redemption or travel to redeem said prize and any liability which might arise from redeeming or seeking to redeem said prize. Sponsor is not responsible for fraudulent calls or emails made to entrants not by the Sponsor. If the Sweepstakes is not capable of running as planned by reason of damage by computer viruses, worms or bugs, tampering, unauthorized intervention, fraud, technical limitations or failures, any Force Majeure Event or any other cause which, in the sole opinion of Sponsor, could corrupt, compromise, undermine or otherwise affect the administration, security, fairness, integrity, viability or proper conduct of the Sweepstakes, Sponsor reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend all or any part of the Sweepstakes, and to select a winner from among all eligible entries received by Sponsor up until the time of such cancellation, termination, modification or suspension, as applicable. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual that (i) tampers or attempts to tamper with the entry process or the operations of this Sweepstakes in any manner, (ii) violates the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions or (iii) acts in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner, or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other person. CAUTION: ANY ATTEMPT BY AN ENTRANT OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THIS SWEEPSTAKES IS A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS. SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND/OR DAMAGES FROM ANY SUCH PERSON TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. Any expenses and receipt and use of the prize and federal, state and local taxes and fees applicable in connection with the prize awarded are the sole responsibility of the winner. An IRS Form 1099 will be issued in the name of the winner for the actual value of the prize received. This Sweepstakes is subject to all federal, state and local laws of the United States.VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. Sponsor, Prize Supplier, and their respective officers, directors, parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries and advertising and promotion agencies, employees, representatives and agents are not responsible for and shall not be liable for (i) any injuries, losses or damages of any kind caused by a prize resulting from acceptance, possession or usage of the prize, or (ii) printing, distribution or production errors. Sponsor or its affiliates may rescind any promotion found to contain such errors without liability at its or their sole discretion.

 

  1. SPONSOR:The Sponsor of this contest is VerticalScope Inc. (the owner and operator of AutoGuide.com), 111 Peter Street, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1.
Enter for a chance to Win a set of tires by subscribing to the AutoGuide.com newsletter.
Read Contest Rules

Get Breaking Automotive News, Reviews and Video in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked