GM Turning To Bankruptcy As Excuse To Avoid Impala Lawsuit

GM Turning To Bankruptcy As Excuse To Avoid Impala Lawsuit

Even though GM admits that the 2007-2008 Chevrolet Impalas has a faulty rear suspension, they’re hoping to avoid a class-action lawsuit by turning to their bankruptcy – as in, the “New GM” can’t be responsible for the “Old GM’s” mistakes.

Seriously? The defect is in a tie-rod design that causes premature wearing of the vehicle’s rear tires. In fact, they’ve proven that it causes the rear tires to wear out after just 6,000-miles. A technical service bulletin was issued in 2008, but GM made it only apply to police-spec Impala models, stating that they’re different than the retail versions. Right.

To us, GM’s response is borderline absurd especially considering there’s concrete evidence of a defect that is affecting owner’s pockets.

New GM did not assume liability for old GM’s design choices, conduct or alleged breaches of liability under the warranty, and its terms expressly preclude money damages,” GM said in response to the suit. The suit “is trying to saddle new GM with the alleged liability and conduct of old GM.”

Shouldn’t GM relate to its consumers when it comes to not wanting to spend excessive money?

[Source: Left Lane News]

  • CA

    GM is GM. new, old, the same company. If they were to avoid bad productions as a new GM, then car companies would be doing the same every year to avoid any potential lawsuits.
    A few good attorneys will bust them!!!

  • Jeffrey

    very short sighted. Take care of your customers and they will take care of you.

  • Mike

    The part numbers for v6 and v8 tie rods are different …
    so yes they are different , thats why a Cop car handles like a cop car
    and your dads impalla handles like a boat