2013 Nissan Pathfinder Concept Video – First Look: 2012 Detroit Auto Show

2013 Nissan Pathfinder Concept Video – First Look: 2012 Detroit Auto Show

Taking a page out of Ford’s playbook, Nissan appears ready to follow suit in the move from SUVs to crossovers announcing that the 2013 Pathfinder will ride on a car-based unibody platform rather than a body-on-frame truck chassis. Over a year ago, Ford made a similar switch with its new Explorer.

As a concept Nissan hasn’t released many specifics about the car but has said it will be powered by a V6 with a CVT transmission and will continue to offer seating for seven. For more on the new 2013 Nissan Pathfinder concept check out AutoGuide’s first look video from the floor of the Detroit Auto Show below.

GALLERY: 2013 Nissan Pathfinder Concept


Get the Flash Player to see this player.

  • Ray

    I’m 50/50 on this one. Not liking how the 2013 Pathfinder lost the bold and rugged looks the current generation has. Nissan should of kept this as Truck/SUV rather than making it into a Crossover.

  • Stephen

    Nissan went to unibody on the R50 Pathfinders of ’96-’04 and we all know how well that worked out: a vehicle that handled poorly and even worse when the rear suspension link bushings wore out, which was more than a common occurrence, and shock towers that rusted out to the point of them being recalled. While the concept may be a good vehicle, it should not be given the Pathfinder name as it’s an insult to what the Pathfinder should be: a rugged, body-on-frame, SUV that can be driven daily but is also off-road capable. The concept looks like a Nissan Rogue on steroids; give it a different name!

  • Jamoi

    I must say that I am somewhat dissappointed by the direction Nissan has taken on this one. While the new Pathfinder looks impressive and has been improved in many areas, it’s no longer a truck. Isn’t that what the Pathfinder was all about? A rugged, capable, 5-speed, 4X4 SUV? In 2011 when the Pathfinder celebrated its 25 year silver anniversay, Nissan bragged that it was the last of the genuine body on frame construction mid-sized SUV’s. Now Nissan has abandoned that philosophy and turned the Pathfinder into… a bigger Murano! Speaking of which; how will the Murano now compete against it’s new and improved, much prettier twin sister? I understand that redesigning the Pathfinder into a CUV allowed Nissan to also develop the new JX for the Infiniti brand (or maybe it was the other way around), but in both cases I dont think these vehicles represent what we love and expect from the manufacturer. A front wheel drive based Infiniti with CVT, that’s NOT built in Japan?! C’mon!! The JX doesn’t even have the trademark Infiniti analog clock for crying out loud! But I digress… Don’t get me wrong, I have always been a Nissan fan. I loved my old Datsun hatchback, loved my Sunny wagon, loved my 2004 Pathfinder, loved my 2007 Versa, love my 2011 Murano and love my 2008 G35x. But now I fear Nissan may alienate some loyal customers by changing a tried and true formula. I say if you really want to experience the sporty performance and off-road excitement that Nissan has offered for so many years in an SUV, stay away from the 2013 Pathfinder and buy and Xterra!

  • Joe

    I too am very dissapointed with the new Pathfinder concept. I was looking forward to the rumored redesign in 2013 as I am considering a switch to an SUV. I would rather buy a used model or move to another brand as I feel this model has now become yet another Murano. I foresee the Pathfinder and Murano sharing the same identity crisis that the Altima and the Maxima had not so many years ago. Crossovers are 4×4 minivans to me and I don’t wan a minvan I want something rugged!

  • Ricky

    This is a shame. They should call this vehicle something else because it doesn’t have the slightest resemblance to what a Pathfinder should look like. A) Its not a truck anymore; B) Where are the classic pathfinder backseat side-door handles that have been a trademark since the beginning? C) Why does it look like a Murano? D) Where’s the rugged/bold look that outdoor enthusiasts have always loved about this car? I’ve always driven a Pathfinder (I’ve had the last three models and currently driving a 2011), but sadly my love affair with this car looks like it will come to an end since there is no way in hell I would drive this.

  • jack77

    This is a major branding error for Nissan. Instead they should call it the new Murano. 2005 to 2012 Pathfinder have the best on road performance for an off road 4×4. With a 5000lb towing capacity 4.0 V6 it is the most capable vehicle and compared to the boring Honda Pilot and underpowered/overpriced 4Runner – the 3rd Generation Pathfinder Nissan is off enormous value – a redesign could destroy the heritage.

  • Colum Wood

    The same could have been said for the new Ford Explorer. The reality is the market for these vehicles is shrinking because only a small percentage actually use the utility.

  • stephen

    I think they moved the pathfinder to a crossover to better suit the needs of 90% of actual pathfinder users – who don’t go offroad at all – and to better tackle the competition (mazda CX9, Subaru Tribeca, and others) The new Nissan Patrol (which pretty much looks like the new prado) will be a better alternative to offroad enthusiasts.

  • Glenn

    I’m sorry to hear the Pathfinder is going to a crossover. I have a 2005 with 150,000 miles and not had any issues and was looking to buy a 2013. I need to pull a boat, so I guess I will have to look at the 4 Runner.

  • Chris

    Great Job Nissan! I currently own a 07 Murano and have been on the hunt for something bigger (third row seating) without sacraficing gas mileage. I thought about a used or a 2012 Pathfinder but poor gas mileage and the lack of design left me searching elsewhere until I saw the 2013 Pathfinder redesign. Can’t wait till it comes out in the fall!!

  • Keith

    This is a travesty–particularly for those of us who own the current-gen. Pathfinder & do regularly use it off-road. Pathfinder means power and capability, and Nissan has seen fit to remove both with this Murano+2 design. Also, suspect that the selectable 4×4 system–probably the best in its class today–will be scrapped…along with the venerable V8 that’s put many a Range Rover to shame. I’ve twice selected a V8 Pathfinder after close consideration of/comparison with the Lexus GX. Seems the GX will now be the last man standing.


    wow i cant believe that nissan made this mistake, im a pathfinder owner and i will keep my curent truck and will cherish it

  • Hextreme2000

    While I have no doubt that this will be a trend setter in the large crossover segment, I am extremely disappointed with the Direction Nissan is going. Pathfinder is a name everyone knows and associated with rugged looks and off road capability. This looks like a moms luxury crossover. Very sad to see one of the last good and real SUVs disappear. I have always been a Nissan trucks and SUV fans, I guess I will have to hold on to my last real Pathy. I let go of my Xterra last year. I hope Nissan doesn’t decide to make that into a crossover too.

  • Jon

    A name like pathfinder should not be a car! I am very shocked to see the new curvy 2013 Pathfinder. It looks more like a Murano or Toyota Highlander.. They should have worked on the interior more. Like more leather seat options, roomier back seats, electric hitch ejector or something suave, 17 to 18 mpg at least! Changing to a car chassis?! Someone should be fired! I upgraded to the 08 Maxima and am happy so far.. Please Nissan, just think about it before putting this on the line. Keep the Nissan the same and change the x-terra!

  • Jon

    More like Puddlefinder or puddle jumper.. Pathfinder?! Come on.

  • DJ

    Just got hail damage to my v8 4runner. Guess this means I’m getting a truck next time. Hey Nissan here in TN. Do you guys ever see what we tow? Many boats aren’t less than 5,000lbs, including mine! Thanks so much or getting rid of theV8 – NOT!!!

  • Ryan

    What the hell is that? come on nissan, you have really screwed up this time. What happened to the tough Pathy. Imagine that lifted and bigger tires….? phhh. Maybe you should ask us for the ideas, (if you redesign, maybe loose the independent front suspension) you would get way more buyers and keep the look of the r50 r51 look.

  • Todd

    My dream car was the Pathfinder 05-12 models. This one looks sissy. No thanks. I’ll keep my 05 model!

  • Glennross01

    Couldnt agree more, i just got back from 4wding in low range on a track full of large muddy puddles. Got it up to the bottom of the doors and it handled it easy. That new model is too low at the front end to be useful for anything other than looking good at my 5 yr olds soccer game. That’s done it for me over to toyota prado for my next vehicle.

  • Bob O’Brien

    I am curious to see this vehicle. I’ve seen a lot of negative comments because of the changes. Maybe Nissan should have named this vehicle something other than the Pathfinder and just discontinued the former Pathfinder. My wife and I have been considering one of the luxury SUVs (BMW X5 and Mercedes M Class), but looking what Nissan is offering in the Pathfinder and Infiniti’s JX, we may consider either. These two vehicles on the surface are looking better than most of their competitors.

  • http://twitter.com/SexyFantasyShop Sexy Fantasy Shop

    It does look nice!!!!


  • http://profile.yahoo.com/Z5P6KVOEKA54R4JJ73QRKU4N4A Botond

    This is really bad, I own a current Pathfinder, and I’m using it not only in the city, but for work. This new one is only good for city.
    The design is horrible, not even close to what it used to be.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/4ALKP6CRZRHD6HMNYH36VFH74I brucef

    thats the point ever one i know with the current one hates it 

  • Teppo

    I’ll keep on getting 4Runners as we actually DO go on jeep trails for camping and hiking a few times per year.   This new Pathfinder looks quite wimpy and just like most of the other “cute utes.”   I had a 1992 Pathfinder  which went everywhere.  It just was back when horsepower was weak in the mid 100’s and struggled up long grades on the highway.    Because of the mandate for better gas mileage the auto makers will be making less and less off-road capable vehicles and more soccer mom crossovers that’ll be more fuel efficient.

  • wareagle!

    I currently have a nissan pathfinder, and love the look of it, but hate the gas mileage. Not to say the new pathfinder looks bad, but it no longer looks like a truck based suv. I actually agree with a comment below, that said they should have just discontinued the pathfinder, and named the new model something else. I will never purchase a pathfinder again, although I am a woman, I do not like the car-based…crossover looking, “cute” SUVs, atleast not for myself. I am very disappointed.

  • Cell923

    Looks like a Santa Fe

  • car_enthusiasist

    I agree with you..

  • http://twitter.com/cpole17 Cory Claypole

    I will miss the tough looking, squared off  Pathfinder that was. I drive a Jeep Patriot now for that truck, off road look, that also gets great mileage. Why not keep the look and chnage the powertrain?

    The improved mileage is great, but from a looks standpoint, it looks like all the rest now.

  • Bdonald27

    I hate it.  I love my 2007 PATHFINDER

  • Roy Jones

    It sucks! At a time when Jeep is smashing sales records refining their 2012/2013 Cherokee (though the 2014 will follow the station wagon mindset too); Nissan seeks to make less sales with a glorified station wagon. Sorry guys, you blew it. I am a Pathfinder owner and sadly I must look elsewhere for my next SUV.

« Back

AutoGuide.com’s Monthly Overlay Newsletter Signup – By subscribing to our email newsletter, Entrants are eligible to win one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card (value of $100.00 USD). One (1) winner will be chosen every month at random and contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. *Amazon.com is not a sponsor of this promotion. Except as required by law, Amazon.com Gift Cards ("GCs") cannot be transferred for value or redeemed for cash. GCs may be used only for purchases of eligible goods at Amazon.com or certain of its affiliated websites. For complete terms and conditions, see www.amazon.com/gc-legal. GCs are issued by ACI Gift Cards, Inc., a Washington corporation. All Amazon ®, ™ & © are IP of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. No expiration date or service fees.


2. PRIZE: One (1) Winner will be randomly selected every month to each receive: one (1) $100.00 Amazon.com Gift Card (the “Prize Supplier”). Total approximate retail value of all prizes is approximately $100.00 USD. Prizes are not transferable and no cash or prize substitution is allowed. Prize package is awarded "as is" with no warranty or guarantee, either express or implied.

3. ELIGIBILITY: From the time of entry through the final date of prize fulfillment, each contest entrant and selected entrant must be a permanent lawful citizen and resident residing in the 50 United States or the District of Columbia or in Canada, and be twenty one (21) years of age or older. VOID IN PUERTO RICO, THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, IN ALL FOREIGN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ALL OTHER U.S. TERRITORIES OR CANADA AND POSSESSIONS AND WHERE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. Employees, officers, directors, agents and representatives, of the Sponsor and the Prize Supplier and each of their respective parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, promotion partners and any entity involved in the development, production, implementation, administration or fulfillment of this Sweepstakes, and the immediate family members (e.g., spouse, mother, father, sister, brother, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, grandparent, in-law, daughter and son, regardless of where they live) and persons living in the same household (whether or not related) of such individuals are not eligible to participate or win. Only one selected entrant per household. All decisions of the Sponsor with respect to this sweepstakes are final. The Sponsor shall have the right at any time to require proof of identity and failure to provide such proof may result in disqualification from the Sweepstakes.

4. ENTER BY INTERNET: You may enter this sweepstakes via the Internet by logging onto AutoGuide.com and subscribing to our email newsletter via the pop-up overlay.

5. SELECTION OF WINNER: One (1) Entrant will be selected by random selection who have subscribed to our email newsletter. The winner may be announced publicly on AutoGuide.com and will be contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. The winner will be required to provide a mailing address (that is not a P.O. box) to receive the prize which will be shipped free of charge.

6. ODDS OF WINNING: Odds of winning a prize are determined by the total number of eligible entries received.

7. RESTRICTIONS: The prize package consists of one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card with an approximate value of $100.00 USD. If prize cannot be awarded due to circumstances beyond the control of the Sponsor or Prize Supplier, no substitute prize will be awarded due to the unique nature of the prize. Sponsor and Prize Supplier shall not be liable to the winner or any person claiming through winner for failure to supply the prize or any part thereof, by reason of any acts of God, any action(s), regulation(s), order(s) or request(s) by any governmental or quasi-governmental entity (whether or not the action(s), regulations(s), order(s) or request(s) prove(s) to be invalid), equipment failure, utility failure, internet failure, terrorist acts, threatened terrorist acts, air raid, blackout, act of public enemy, earthquake, war (declared or undeclared), fire, flood, epidemic, explosion, unusually severe weather, hurricane, embargo, labor dispute or strike (whether legal or illegal) labor or material shortage, transportation interruption of any kind, work slow-down, civil disturbance, insurrection, riot, or any other cause beyond Sponsor's or Prize Supplier's control (collectively, "Force Majeure Event"). Sponsor shall not be responsible for any cancellations, delays, diversions or substitutions or any act or omissions whatsoever by the performers/events, other transportation companies or any other persons providing any of these services and accommodations to passengers including any results thereof such as changes in services or accommodations necessitated by same.

8. CONDITIONS: By entering the Sweepstakes, entrants agree to be bound by the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions and that Sponsor has the irrevocable right to use in perpetuity entrants' names, user names, likenesses, photographs, voices, home mailing address, biographical and prize information, and entry materials, without notice to entrants and without compensation or obligation, in any and all media now or hereafter known throughout the world, in any manner whatsoever, to advertise and promote Sponsor, its products and services, the Sweepstakes, and for any other purpose except where prohibited by law. Entrant waives the right to assert as a cost of winning a prize any and all costs of verification and redemption or travel to redeem said prize and any liability which might arise from redeeming or seeking to redeem said prize. Sponsor is not responsible for fraudulent calls or emails made to entrants not by the Sponsor. If the Sweepstakes is not capable of running as planned by reason of damage by computer viruses, worms or bugs, tampering, unauthorized intervention, fraud, technical limitations or failures, any Force Majeure Event or any other cause which, in the sole opinion of Sponsor, could corrupt, compromise, undermine or otherwise affect the administration, security, fairness, integrity, viability or proper conduct of the Sweepstakes, Sponsor reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend all or any part of the Sweepstakes, and to select a winner from among all eligible entries received by Sponsor up until the time of such cancellation, termination, modification or suspension, as applicable. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual that (i) tampers or attempts to tamper with the entry process or the operations of this Sweepstakes in any manner, (ii) violates the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions or (iii) acts in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner, or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other person. CAUTION: ANY ATTEMPT BY AN ENTRANT OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THIS SWEEPSTAKES IS A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS. SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND/OR DAMAGES FROM ANY SUCH PERSON TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. Any expenses and receipt and use of the prize and federal, state and local taxes and fees applicable in connection with the prize awarded are the sole responsibility of the winner. An IRS Form 1099 will be issued in the name of the winner for the actual value of the prize received. This Sweepstakes is subject to all federal, state and local laws of the United States. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. Sponsor, Prize Supplier, and their respective officers, directors, parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries and advertising and promotion agencies, employees, representatives and agents are not responsible for and shall not be liable for (i) any injuries, losses or damages of any kind caused by a prize resulting from acceptance, possession or usage of the prize, or (ii) printing, distribution or production errors. Sponsor or its affiliates may rescind any promotion found to contain such errors without liability at its or their sole discretion.

9. SPONSOR: The Sponsor of this contest is VerticalScope Inc. (the owner and operator of AutoGuide.com), 111 Peter Street, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1.

Subscribe to our email newsletter and automatically be entered to win.
*Restrictions apply. See offer for details

Get Breaking Automotive News, Reviews and Video in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked