Electric Cars May Pollute More than Gas Models: Study

14
Electric Cars May Pollute More than Gas Models: Study

Electric vehicles probably seem to have a tiny carbon footprint at the surface, but a recent study suggests environmental impact varies in gravity according to where the vehicle is charged.

Automakers tout EVs as zero-emission transportation but that doesn’t mean they don’t have an environmental impact. The issue is that charging creates green house gases, and those emissions aren’t necessarily constant. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, which uses the electric power requirements of the Nissan Leaf as a basis for comparison, there is a significant disparity in greenhouse gases released into the environment depending on the source of the electricity itself.

The study that will be officially released on Monday states that a full cycle of energy production, also known as well-to-wheel analysis, must be taken into account. Findings from the U.C.S. report demonstrate that electric utilities that rely on natural gas, nuclear, hydroelectric, or renewable sources to power their generators serve a far greater potential of reducing carbon dioxide emissions than coal-burning electric plants. According to U.C.S., greenhouse gases from coal plants negatively affect the well-to-wheel figure for electric vehicles enough that it suffers a greater carbon footprint than that of subcompact vehicles featuring the latest gasoline engines.

A geographical breakdown of electricity generation is also included in the report to identify the dirtier coal power plants in question. The findings show that only the 45 percent of the U.S. population living along the coasts have sources of electricity capable of using a Nissan Leaf EV at lower greenhouse gas levels than gasoline engine vehicles capable of 50 mpg in combined driving.

In fact, 37 percent of Americans reside in regions where a Nissan Leaf’s impact would only match gasoline vehicles rated at 41 to 50 mpg. Finally, 18 percent of Americans live in regions that are worse, where greenhouse gas emissions from the Leaf only match gasoline vehicle rated from a combined 31 to 40 mpg, which measures up to emissions from the Ford Focus, or Hyundai Elantra.

At its core, U.C.S. hopes the study will encourage modernized power plants. Senior U.C.S. engineer, Don Anair, said the dirtiest electric-grid regions account for between two and a half to four times the global-warming emissions than those of the cleanest regions. Still, it seems there’s hope.

“A number of old coal-fired power plants are now being retired. Given emission standards recently introduced by the current administration, any new coal-fired plants will be far cleaner than their predecessors,” he said.

[Source: New York Times]

  • http://twitter.com/cbasinger Christopher Basinger

    The study says that 82% of people in the US live where emissions for EVs are lower than a 41-50 mpg car.  Sounds pretty good to me! My next car will be an EV because I choose to purchase my fuel from a local source, not from Venezuela or Iran or who knows from where else, that would just as soon bomb us with weapons bought with OUR money!

  • ATR72_captain

    you have no idea where the oil comes from that you buy. the fueling stations get their fuel all from the same place. then they add their own additives in to make it the product they advertise.

  • SteveEV

    I installed solar collectors on my garage roof that now generate my transportation fuel. Can’t get more local than that.

  • RedmondChad

    The study hasn’t been released yet, so I can’t see what they did or didn’t include.  But I can say that this study seems notably more pessimistic than most full-cycle studies, and there have been a lot of them.  Here’s an overview of a few dozen earlier studies: http://www.sherryboschert.com/Downloads/Emissions.pdf.  Despite the fact that coal was 52% of generation in 2007 (the center of most of these studies) and it’s now down to 42%, the general consensus of these studies (they don’t all conclude exactly the same thing; some of the more pessimistic are missing some obvious things) was that almost everybody is better off with an EV.  The only exception is where electricity comes from 100% coal; then you might be slightly better off with the best of hybrids, like a Prius.

    Of course, that’s only considering the environmental reasons to buy them.  Even if the EV is no cleaner today (it could be in the future–the gas car won’t be!), it’s still domestic energy, and it’s still a lot cheaper, and you still get a smoother, quieter car with much nicer throttle response and great low-end torque.

  • SteveEV

    When I say my carbon footprint is zero, I mean zero. I installed solar collectors on my garage to power my house and car. Half the other LEAF drivers I know have done the same. If a car buyer is concerned about fuel costs, look at an electric vehicle. If a car buyer is concerned about pollution, look at an electric vehicle. If a car buyer is concerned about long-term maintenance costs, look at an electric vehicle. If a car buyer is concerned about improving the local economy, look at an electric vehicle. If a car buyer is concerned about national security and oil shortages, look at an electric vehicle.

  • Atr72_captain

    sorry but your wrong, the batteries you have in your leaf took energy to produce and they are gonna take energy to dispose of their toxic chemicals when their service life is complete  so you only lie to yourself

  • SteveEV

    Hardly. Those batteries are far too valuable to throw away. I expect to use them far a home backup power system or sell them to a recycler when thy have finished serving my transportation needs. Meanwhile I have already stopped burning gas. The money I save supports our local economy. The air is cleaner in my driveway. Since I generate my own electricity the air is cleaner towards the power plant as well. Every car requires energy to manufacture. Most require even more to operate. That generally translates into a significant toxic contribution to the air we breathe. I prefer a different arrangement.

  • Falco

    You don’t fart? watch out since South Park shows people will blow up if they hold their farts.

  • PaulScott58

    It’s time the media got on the right side of this issue. This whole “which is cleaner, the EV or the gas burner” issue has been viewed from the wrong end of the binoculars. 

    You assume stasis in a given utility’s grid mix, when a cursory study of the electrical grid would indicate otherwise. The direction energy providers are going is clearly toward renewables. Since Obama became President, we’ve reduced coal’s percentage of the national grid mix from 53% to today’s 39%. All it took was for the EPA to be told to enforce laws already on the books. That, and a severe recession that reduced demand.

    Since Steven Chu has been in charge of the Energy Dept., there has been a rapid growth in renewables. In the past 3 years we’ve installed over 27 GW of wind and 3 GW of solar on the U.S. grid. That’s enough renewable energy to power 25 million EVs! The adoption of plug-in cars will be vastly outpaced by the renewable energy being added to the grid.

    The extraction and refining of oil uses more electricity and natural gas than any industry in California with the exception of pumping vast quantities of water hundreds of miles and over mountains. Once enough plug-in cars replace gas burners, we’ll start seeing refineries close. These are the most polluting industrial complexes in the U.S. They are directly responsible for thousands of deaths from the pollution they generate. The faster we transition to EVs, the faster we close refineries.

    Going back to the original story line of whether an EV was more polluting than an internal combustion car, in essence, this is a question of how aware the customer is. If anyone is truly concerned about pollution from coal generated electricity, all you need to do is enroll in your utility’s renewable energy program, or install solar panels. That choice is, and has been, yours to make for a long time. If you don’t think cars should run on dirty energy, then your house shouldn’t either.

  • Patrick Connor

    With an EV, you can choose how you fuel it. Clean or not, it is up to you, either way it is American made fuel. Guess what, oil refineries use electricity, a lot of it. EVs just cut out this middle man. The grid is getting cleaner as more wind turbines are put up. Oil is only getting dirtier as heavier crude is pumped from deeper sources.

  • InigoMontoya6

    I wish they would stop with the pessimistic slant on these types of reviews.  I know its for ratings but as others have pointed out, its not accurate and IMHO only serves to generate negative talk on what passes for “news” these days.  EVs should be evaluated from pump to wheel rather than well to wheel…and everyone should get panels on their roof to distribute/localize energy production.  Separate studies can be done to evaluate well to pump which is a separate (yet related) issue.  And most importantly, as some others have mentioned, even if EVs were only equal to current gas solutions, they shift reliance to domestically created energy rather than imported.

  • The Cat

    If you took the time to actually read the studies from the UCS, you’d see that your headline is completely wrong, and does NOT agree with the UCS reports at all. Bad reporting, boys and girls. As we get better and better at producing clean energy, EVs will also get cleaner and cleaner. Check out
    http://green.autoblog.com/2012/04/16/ucs-no-matter-where-you-live-driving-electric-saves-money-emi/

    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-16/electric-cars-cost-1-200-a-year-less-to-run-study-says

    http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-electric-vehicles-20120416,0,5852349.story

  • Michael Heffron

    My Chevy Volt is 100% solar powered. The Nissan Leaf can be solar powered just as easily. I don’t think it takes a genius to figure out that solution. Are there any real scientists in the Union of Concerned Scientists?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=695240567 Jean-Charles Jacquemin

    An Electric car does not pollute.!!! Electric power plant pollutes more or less. From which pervert conception does a non emiting car emits something ??

« Back
SWEEPSTAKES – OFFICIAL RULES, TERMS AND CONDITIONS

AutoGuide.com’s Monthly Overlay Newsletter Signup – By subscribing to our email newsletter, Entrants are eligible to win one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card (value of $100.00 USD). One (1) winner will be chosen every month at random and contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. *Amazon.com is not a sponsor of this promotion. Except as required by law, Amazon.com Gift Cards ("GCs") cannot be transferred for value or redeemed for cash. GCs may be used only for purchases of eligible goods at Amazon.com or certain of its affiliated websites. For complete terms and conditions, see www.amazon.com/gc-legal. GCs are issued by ACI Gift Cards, Inc., a Washington corporation. All Amazon ®, ™ & © are IP of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. No expiration date or service fees.

1. NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT OF ANY KIND IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN THIS SWEEPSTAKES. AGE/RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS, VOID WHERE PROHIBITED.

2. PRIZE: One (1) Winner will be randomly selected every month to each receive: one (1) $100.00 Amazon.com Gift Card (the “Prize Supplier”). Total approximate retail value of all prizes is approximately $100.00 USD. Prizes are not transferable and no cash or prize substitution is allowed. Prize package is awarded "as is" with no warranty or guarantee, either express or implied.

3. ELIGIBILITY: From the time of entry through the final date of prize fulfillment, each contest entrant and selected entrant must be a permanent lawful citizen and resident residing in the 50 United States or the District of Columbia or in Canada, and be twenty one (21) years of age or older. VOID IN PUERTO RICO, THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, IN ALL FOREIGN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ALL OTHER U.S. TERRITORIES OR CANADA AND POSSESSIONS AND WHERE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. Employees, officers, directors, agents and representatives, of the Sponsor and the Prize Supplier and each of their respective parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, promotion partners and any entity involved in the development, production, implementation, administration or fulfillment of this Sweepstakes, and the immediate family members (e.g., spouse, mother, father, sister, brother, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, grandparent, in-law, daughter and son, regardless of where they live) and persons living in the same household (whether or not related) of such individuals are not eligible to participate or win. Only one selected entrant per household. All decisions of the Sponsor with respect to this sweepstakes are final. The Sponsor shall have the right at any time to require proof of identity and failure to provide such proof may result in disqualification from the Sweepstakes.

4. ENTER BY INTERNET: You may enter this sweepstakes via the Internet by logging onto AutoGuide.com and subscribing to our email newsletter via the pop-up overlay.

5. SELECTION OF WINNER: One (1) Entrant will be selected by random selection who have subscribed to our email newsletter. The winner may be announced publicly on AutoGuide.com and will be contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. The winner will be required to provide a mailing address (that is not a P.O. box) to receive the prize which will be shipped free of charge.

6. ODDS OF WINNING: Odds of winning a prize are determined by the total number of eligible entries received.

7. RESTRICTIONS: The prize package consists of one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card with an approximate value of $100.00 USD. If prize cannot be awarded due to circumstances beyond the control of the Sponsor or Prize Supplier, no substitute prize will be awarded due to the unique nature of the prize. Sponsor and Prize Supplier shall not be liable to the winner or any person claiming through winner for failure to supply the prize or any part thereof, by reason of any acts of God, any action(s), regulation(s), order(s) or request(s) by any governmental or quasi-governmental entity (whether or not the action(s), regulations(s), order(s) or request(s) prove(s) to be invalid), equipment failure, utility failure, internet failure, terrorist acts, threatened terrorist acts, air raid, blackout, act of public enemy, earthquake, war (declared or undeclared), fire, flood, epidemic, explosion, unusually severe weather, hurricane, embargo, labor dispute or strike (whether legal or illegal) labor or material shortage, transportation interruption of any kind, work slow-down, civil disturbance, insurrection, riot, or any other cause beyond Sponsor's or Prize Supplier's control (collectively, "Force Majeure Event"). Sponsor shall not be responsible for any cancellations, delays, diversions or substitutions or any act or omissions whatsoever by the performers/events, other transportation companies or any other persons providing any of these services and accommodations to passengers including any results thereof such as changes in services or accommodations necessitated by same.

8. CONDITIONS: By entering the Sweepstakes, entrants agree to be bound by the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions and that Sponsor has the irrevocable right to use in perpetuity entrants' names, user names, likenesses, photographs, voices, home mailing address, biographical and prize information, and entry materials, without notice to entrants and without compensation or obligation, in any and all media now or hereafter known throughout the world, in any manner whatsoever, to advertise and promote Sponsor, its products and services, the Sweepstakes, and for any other purpose except where prohibited by law. Entrant waives the right to assert as a cost of winning a prize any and all costs of verification and redemption or travel to redeem said prize and any liability which might arise from redeeming or seeking to redeem said prize. Sponsor is not responsible for fraudulent calls or emails made to entrants not by the Sponsor. If the Sweepstakes is not capable of running as planned by reason of damage by computer viruses, worms or bugs, tampering, unauthorized intervention, fraud, technical limitations or failures, any Force Majeure Event or any other cause which, in the sole opinion of Sponsor, could corrupt, compromise, undermine or otherwise affect the administration, security, fairness, integrity, viability or proper conduct of the Sweepstakes, Sponsor reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend all or any part of the Sweepstakes, and to select a winner from among all eligible entries received by Sponsor up until the time of such cancellation, termination, modification or suspension, as applicable. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual that (i) tampers or attempts to tamper with the entry process or the operations of this Sweepstakes in any manner, (ii) violates the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions or (iii) acts in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner, or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other person. CAUTION: ANY ATTEMPT BY AN ENTRANT OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THIS SWEEPSTAKES IS A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS. SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND/OR DAMAGES FROM ANY SUCH PERSON TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. Any expenses and receipt and use of the prize and federal, state and local taxes and fees applicable in connection with the prize awarded are the sole responsibility of the winner. An IRS Form 1099 will be issued in the name of the winner for the actual value of the prize received. This Sweepstakes is subject to all federal, state and local laws of the United States. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. Sponsor, Prize Supplier, and their respective officers, directors, parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries and advertising and promotion agencies, employees, representatives and agents are not responsible for and shall not be liable for (i) any injuries, losses or damages of any kind caused by a prize resulting from acceptance, possession or usage of the prize, or (ii) printing, distribution or production errors. Sponsor or its affiliates may rescind any promotion found to contain such errors without liability at its or their sole discretion.

9. SPONSOR: The Sponsor of this contest is VerticalScope Inc. (the owner and operator of AutoGuide.com), 111 Peter Street, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1.

Subscribe to our email newsletter and automatically be entered to win.
*Restrictions apply. See offer for details

Get Breaking Automotive News, Reviews and Video in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked