2015 Ford Mustang Mule Confirms Independent Rear Suspension

25
2015 Ford Mustang Mule Confirms Independent Rear Suspension

The 2015 Ford Mustang will say goodbye to its Pony Car heritage and embrace its future as a legitimate sports car, in the process tossing aside its solid-rear axle for an independent rear suspension.

A rumor for years, new spy photos recently captured show a test mule for the 2015 Mustang, even revealing its underside. And in the place of the archaic solid rear axle are what appear to be aluminum control arms. We won’t know for sure for quite some time now if the production model will get this setup, especially as Ford has admitted the current generation ‘Stang tested out a similar independent rear suspension but eventually went with the solid axle.

Making it all but certain, however, is the fact that Ford has been obvious that it plans on transforming the Mustang for its 50th anniversary. Included in the overhaul is styling inspired by the Evos concept (and similar to that found on modern Ford products like the 2013 Fusion). To give a better idea of exactly how that might look, we’ve commissioned the rendering above.

Also set to help revolutionize the 2015 Mustang is an EcoBoost engine, most likely a twin-turbo V6.

Many in the Mustang faithful will protest the dramatic change for the 2015 model year car, but Ford has good reason for the change. Apart from corporate ambitions to take on European sports cars, Ford has to think about the future of the iconic nameplate – something that’s currently in jeopardy as Generation Y turns away from Pony Cars towards new-era vehicles like the Hyundai Genesis Coupe.

[Source: Car & Driver]

  • T Beech

    Time marches on but I’ll stay with my ’69 Fastback.

  • Leo_mob_leo

    this is nothing but bull shit i hate all these changes am a teen and always loved mustangs but not the 2015 cuz its going to be a evos not a pony car like it should be i might as well start liking camaros more 

  • Tyedyed69

    Is it just me or did they copy a late 90’s, early 00’s Ferrari design ?  This car looks more like it should be named “The Shark Car” instead of being called a Pony Car.   Ford did a good thing with the retro design and now screwed it up with this.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FOTS6SNA7IOJOFQTSN4S52K7AM Chad W

    Ford, did you learn nothing from the Mustang II?  Go ahead, throw away everything that says “Mustang”.  Guess I better one of the Mustangs while really are a mustang, and not this travesty of management.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/7DO2GVUWMBS536XXSTOAXCU4VQ Michael

    Let’s get something out of the way right now, not just for you but everyone.  The idea that SRA should stay is assinine.  A well engineered IRS is superior and nothing about it pulls away from “mustang” as a brand.  So it’s really REALLy nuts to argue against it.  Yes, Roush is impressive with it’s tuning.  But let’s not be the best in the world at polishing a turd so well that it competes with a Vette/Ferrarri suspension.  Let’s untie our hands shall we?

    Now, to Chad…What you have to understand is that…

    A) This is a rendering only.  There are actually good and bad queues here.  The lean in the direciton of a Genesis coupe would be a travesty.  “Let’s look like Genesis” is nothing close to an idea any other world supercar leaders are doing.  But again, it’s a rendering.  And there are still historical design cues in the front that say mustang better than the early 2000’s generation.  Can’t see the back.  Let’s just see what they do.

    B)  The Mustang II?  I have a BIG problem with that analogy because the real problem with Mustangs in that era was the era.  Meaning, they were pieces of crap cars, like many American makes at the time.  There was no way to get behind crap no matter what it looked like.  Ford’s today are making so much better cars.  There is no comparison.  And they would presume to up the anti in engineering, performance and quality moving into this segment.  If, for example, this thing runs close to a 3 second 0-60, 11 sec or under quarter mile at 130 plus, over 200 mph top speed, runs the Nurburgring in 7:30 or under in it’s highest performance offering, does this with decent daily-driver fuel mileage on pump gas with good emissions, AND it keeps design cues and proportions that look genuine Mustang even if more sports car, THEN it’s going to dominate and win everyone over.  “Mustang II” issues are laughable.  This would catch fire.  And a winner like that always looks good and feels good.

    Clue:  those specs are the motivation for shifting any at all, and only as much as needed.  They would create a new high performance model/name offering in the Vette/Viper category seperate from Mustang if it looked nothing like a Mustang.  But what they are doing is saying we’re taking Mustang to the next level, and the Vette and Viper are going to have to really bring it to keep up.  Not a new GT40 again.  But a Mustang that exceeds the performance of any Ford car in history, and makes it tough for the competition to match.  Some of that competition being the likes of a GTR nowadays.  Well, like GTR, lets go tap a Porsche 911 Turbo S on the shoulder as well and say “BOO!” competitively Ford style (sans AWD), and probably more competitively than the GTR.

    Be patient on this.  Let’s see where they take it.

  • Felix

    First off, everyone, this is a rendering from autoguide, not the design from Ford. Don’t expect it to look anything like this. Second of all, Ford has decided on the IRS yet, they looked at IRS for the previous gen Mustang but decided against the idea. I think that they should offer both IRS and SRA. Make everyone happy

  • T. Roll

     That just isn’t a feasible business plan.

  • Felix

     I know, but i can dream!

  • http://twitter.com/alhmnci AUTO WORLD
  • KeysBarnes

    Ford continues to make horse’s ass decisions, like stopping the E series and bringing in a wimpy boxey Euro full size van, stopping the Ranger, making crap FWD transaxles instead of going back to rear wheel drive in their Fusion and Taurus. However, Independent rear suspension is much better than the solid rear axle.

  • Johntberg

     “Stopping the E-series” — not yet in fact, Ford will continue to make this antique platform for a bit longer, while also offering (at last) at Euro/world style high roof van.  “Wimpy”?  I think not!  The Ford (and Chevy) vans are pieces from a bygone era, with much poorer ergonomics in both the driver’s and the load sections — long and skinny rear, not nearly as useful as the Transit Euro style approach that has been found around the globe for several decades now.  But like I say, if you insist on having your old friend, you can still get the platform — as long as you want it for an RV or similar purpose.  (And you can go ahead and buy three or four 2012 E series vans and just keep ’em around for nostalgia purposes, alongside your horse-and-buggy rig.)

  • Homeytwist

    Finally, a Mustang I would consider buying! Koodos to Ford for looking at the world market rather than just the drag-strips of the U.S. I’m sure the aftermarket will offer a SRA kit for those who just want to go in a straight line, heck if Ford were smart they’d offer that through their Ford Motorsports / Racing channel.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Danny-Baker/100000540161367 Danny Baker

    Ford Tried it on 2001-2003 Cobras. It must cost more to build and that will run away some buyers.

  • Jme927

    I’ll believe that Mustang when I se it…………

  • Dsmith3109

    Love this car never had a mustang but if they build this i will buy.

  • Mcgilm

    You know, Ford did a fantastic job of making the solid axle perform better than anyone could have expected.  However, if they had left the car alone and fixed just a few things, they could have had a car that would have shocked even the euro crowd.

    1. Dump the solid rear axle and move to IRS.  This has been a drawback to the awesome power from the SC V8 that you’ve been putting in the GT500.

    2. Allow more control over the steering column position so that the driver felt more a part of the car than on top of it.

    3. Get some cooling duct work into the body design to help cool the brakes.  They are only good for less than one track lap before they fade beyond reliability.

    Seriously, this is not that significant of a change, and would put the Mustang head and shoulders against anything in its price range. FORD!!!!  What are you waiting for!!!!!

  • Christopher G

    I test drove a GT and the lack of adjustable steering really ruins it for a tall person. This is one of the reasons I could never buy it.

  • Cperr2000

    Remember when the Probe was going to be the new sports car that would displace the Mustang? Not totally opposed to the independent rear, but hope they don’t go too modern on the look, and keep a V8 option (preferably 5.0 based engine option). I’m currently averaging just shy of 24 mpg in my 2013 auto GT. my 4 cylinder Sonata is only averaging 28.

    I know cost is an issue, but it would be nice if Ford would have a “muscle car” and “sports car” offering a-la Camaro and Corvette.

    Us drag racers appreciate a solid rear axle!

  • http://www.facebook.com/higginsmc Michael C Higgins

    This new design is awesome!  The Mustang GT keeps getting better and better – great job Ford!!

  • Nicholaskeene

    this is dumb, ford you change the mustang I am not a ford person anymore

  • Roger Moss

    King Cobra coming ? 

  • McCheeseFist

    Looks its a CAMARO!

    Will it have wheel hop also?

  • HankHH

    Ford engineers, listen up! I sold my 2011GT500 and bought a Genesis Coupe. The Genesis Coupe has three things my GT500 lacked – a torsen differential that actually puts power to both rear wheels. My GT500 would spin the right rear only on a tight right hand curve exit. My Genesis Coupe spins the tires without trying to self destruct with insane wheel hop. My Genesis Coupe has a stereo system that is a pleasure to hear. My GT500 had a garbage system that I never used. Fortunately, the exhaust and supercharger sounded so good that I listened to that instead. So Ford – NO WHEEL HOP, and use a torsen differential! Oh yeah my Genesis Coupe has performance calipers on all four corners – not just the front..

  • bob

    Ford had IRS in the Thunderbird from 89-97. The cobras were almost a copy of that system.

  • Christopher G

    I would definitely consider this car if it offers a turbo V6 with a strong manual transmission and clutch. I’ve never owned a Ford, but sophisticated suspension and a jump in tech and quality can win me over. :-)

« Back
SWEEPSTAKES – OFFICIAL RULES, TERMS AND CONDITIONS

AutoGuide.com’s Monthly Overlay Newsletter Signup – By subscribing to our email newsletter, Entrants are eligible to win one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card (value of $100.00 USD). One (1) winner will be chosen every month at random and contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. *Amazon.com is not a sponsor of this promotion. Except as required by law, Amazon.com Gift Cards ("GCs") cannot be transferred for value or redeemed for cash. GCs may be used only for purchases of eligible goods at Amazon.com or certain of its affiliated websites. For complete terms and conditions, see www.amazon.com/gc-legal. GCs are issued by ACI Gift Cards, Inc., a Washington corporation. All Amazon ®, ™ & © are IP of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. No expiration date or service fees.

1. NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT OF ANY KIND IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN THIS SWEEPSTAKES. AGE/RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS, VOID WHERE PROHIBITED.

2. PRIZE: One (1) Winner will be randomly selected every month to each receive: one (1) $100.00 Amazon.com Gift Card (the “Prize Supplier”). Total approximate retail value of all prizes is approximately $100.00 USD. Prizes are not transferable and no cash or prize substitution is allowed. Prize package is awarded "as is" with no warranty or guarantee, either express or implied.

3. ELIGIBILITY: From the time of entry through the final date of prize fulfillment, each contest entrant and selected entrant must be a permanent lawful citizen and resident residing in the 50 United States or the District of Columbia or in Canada, and be twenty one (21) years of age or older. VOID IN PUERTO RICO, THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, IN ALL FOREIGN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ALL OTHER U.S. TERRITORIES OR CANADA AND POSSESSIONS AND WHERE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. Employees, officers, directors, agents and representatives, of the Sponsor and the Prize Supplier and each of their respective parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, promotion partners and any entity involved in the development, production, implementation, administration or fulfillment of this Sweepstakes, and the immediate family members (e.g., spouse, mother, father, sister, brother, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, grandparent, in-law, daughter and son, regardless of where they live) and persons living in the same household (whether or not related) of such individuals are not eligible to participate or win. Only one selected entrant per household. All decisions of the Sponsor with respect to this sweepstakes are final. The Sponsor shall have the right at any time to require proof of identity and failure to provide such proof may result in disqualification from the Sweepstakes.

4. ENTER BY INTERNET: You may enter this sweepstakes via the Internet by logging onto AutoGuide.com and subscribing to our email newsletter via the pop-up overlay.

5. SELECTION OF WINNER: One (1) Entrant will be selected by random selection who have subscribed to our email newsletter. The winner may be announced publicly on AutoGuide.com and will be contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. The winner will be required to provide a mailing address (that is not a P.O. box) to receive the prize which will be shipped free of charge.

6. ODDS OF WINNING: Odds of winning a prize are determined by the total number of eligible entries received.

7. RESTRICTIONS: The prize package consists of one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card with an approximate value of $100.00 USD. If prize cannot be awarded due to circumstances beyond the control of the Sponsor or Prize Supplier, no substitute prize will be awarded due to the unique nature of the prize. Sponsor and Prize Supplier shall not be liable to the winner or any person claiming through winner for failure to supply the prize or any part thereof, by reason of any acts of God, any action(s), regulation(s), order(s) or request(s) by any governmental or quasi-governmental entity (whether or not the action(s), regulations(s), order(s) or request(s) prove(s) to be invalid), equipment failure, utility failure, internet failure, terrorist acts, threatened terrorist acts, air raid, blackout, act of public enemy, earthquake, war (declared or undeclared), fire, flood, epidemic, explosion, unusually severe weather, hurricane, embargo, labor dispute or strike (whether legal or illegal) labor or material shortage, transportation interruption of any kind, work slow-down, civil disturbance, insurrection, riot, or any other cause beyond Sponsor's or Prize Supplier's control (collectively, "Force Majeure Event"). Sponsor shall not be responsible for any cancellations, delays, diversions or substitutions or any act or omissions whatsoever by the performers/events, other transportation companies or any other persons providing any of these services and accommodations to passengers including any results thereof such as changes in services or accommodations necessitated by same.

8. CONDITIONS: By entering the Sweepstakes, entrants agree to be bound by the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions and that Sponsor has the irrevocable right to use in perpetuity entrants' names, user names, likenesses, photographs, voices, home mailing address, biographical and prize information, and entry materials, without notice to entrants and without compensation or obligation, in any and all media now or hereafter known throughout the world, in any manner whatsoever, to advertise and promote Sponsor, its products and services, the Sweepstakes, and for any other purpose except where prohibited by law. Entrant waives the right to assert as a cost of winning a prize any and all costs of verification and redemption or travel to redeem said prize and any liability which might arise from redeeming or seeking to redeem said prize. Sponsor is not responsible for fraudulent calls or emails made to entrants not by the Sponsor. If the Sweepstakes is not capable of running as planned by reason of damage by computer viruses, worms or bugs, tampering, unauthorized intervention, fraud, technical limitations or failures, any Force Majeure Event or any other cause which, in the sole opinion of Sponsor, could corrupt, compromise, undermine or otherwise affect the administration, security, fairness, integrity, viability or proper conduct of the Sweepstakes, Sponsor reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend all or any part of the Sweepstakes, and to select a winner from among all eligible entries received by Sponsor up until the time of such cancellation, termination, modification or suspension, as applicable. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual that (i) tampers or attempts to tamper with the entry process or the operations of this Sweepstakes in any manner, (ii) violates the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions or (iii) acts in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner, or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other person. CAUTION: ANY ATTEMPT BY AN ENTRANT OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THIS SWEEPSTAKES IS A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS. SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND/OR DAMAGES FROM ANY SUCH PERSON TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. Any expenses and receipt and use of the prize and federal, state and local taxes and fees applicable in connection with the prize awarded are the sole responsibility of the winner. An IRS Form 1099 will be issued in the name of the winner for the actual value of the prize received. This Sweepstakes is subject to all federal, state and local laws of the United States. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. Sponsor, Prize Supplier, and their respective officers, directors, parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries and advertising and promotion agencies, employees, representatives and agents are not responsible for and shall not be liable for (i) any injuries, losses or damages of any kind caused by a prize resulting from acceptance, possession or usage of the prize, or (ii) printing, distribution or production errors. Sponsor or its affiliates may rescind any promotion found to contain such errors without liability at its or their sole discretion.

9. SPONSOR: The Sponsor of this contest is VerticalScope Inc. (the owner and operator of AutoGuide.com), 111 Peter Street, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1.

Subscribe to our email newsletter and automatically be entered to win.
*Restrictions apply. See offer for details

Get Breaking Automotive News, Reviews and Video in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked