Home / Auto News / News article: Top 10 Affordable Rear-Wheel-Drive Cars: Catch ‘em While You Can
 |  Feb 27, 3:32 PM

Top 10 Affordable Rear-Wheel-Drive Cars

Lawmakers in Washington D.C. and California are armed with a legislative battleaxe and they’re bringing it to bear against the automotive industry. Fuel-economy regulations are hitting like a war hammer, disrupting the market and crushing carmakers. In a mad dash to meet upcoming CAFE standards manufacturers are dramatically shifting their product offerings. Downsized vehicles, hybrid drivetrains and diesel engines are some of the tools in their defensive arsenals.

SEE ALSO: Why Front-Wheel-Drive Cars Are More Efficient

One unfortunate victim of this efficiency stampede is rear-wheel drive. Slowly but surely over the last 30 years automakers have made the switch to front-drive, a layout that’s more economical in a number of ways. But not everyone is content driving a Nissan Sentra, or getting by in a minivan. For enthusiasts that care about performance rear-wheel drive is king, but it’s a monarch that’s under siege. Keeping the dream alive, here’s a list of the Top 10 (reasonably) affordable RWD cars on the market today. Act fast before they’re gone in a puff of tire smoke.

  • smartacus

    Thank You for completing your irrelevance to automotive journalism, Cole.  

    -Every last automotive ignoramus knows it’s an automated manual and not an automatic with a torque converter (if you don’t believe me, i defy you to ask ANY high-school cheerleader and undocumented worker)

    -Its “substandard fuel economy” is only the best non-hybrid non-diesel fuel economy for the last 5 years strong.

  • Hubert

    That’s a bit harsh and you’re a douche. Great article, but I don’t get it, why don’t the pictures in the tiles don’t line up with the cars. doesnt makesense.

  • smartacus

    Don’t misunderstand; I’m second to none in being happy for your considering me a “douche” :)
    But the author indeed lost his journalistic objectivity, thereby reflecting negatively on AUTOGUIDE. 

    Single unfortunate sentences or paragraphs have always been the proverbial “kiss of death” to many young aspiring people before and he won’t be the last to be let go for a hotheaded mistake.

    It’s part of the game.

  • Andy Milonakis

    Which sentence are you referring to?

  • http://dbcooper.livejournal.com P.F. Bruns

    Traditionally, “SS” at Chevrolet tends to stand for “Super Sport.” In this case, it might be understood to mean either that, “Sport Sedan,” or even both.

    Or was Mr. Cole making a funny? :)

  • smartacus

    Hi Andy Milonakis,
       on page 11; he calls it an automatic transmission when he knows full well it is not.  It is clearly a manual transmission in a vehicle without enough room for clutch pedal linkage. 
    He also tells us it has “substandard fuel economy”  when he is in complete knowledge that what he just wrote is exactly opposite of any reality or hallucination.  It has only the best non-hybrid and non-diesel economy in the USA for the last 5 years.

          Because his other articles are conveniently available for everyone to see,  it unfortunately becomes an inescapable and irrefutable fact that indeed he did not make an honest mistake.  He did know better, yet chose to MISINFORM. 

  • http://dbcooper.livejournal.com P.F. Bruns

     I think AutoGuide must have edited the slideshow since you posted. They’re lining up for me.

  • http://dbcooper.livejournal.com P.F. Bruns

     Okay, I’ll spot you the “worst car on the road today” opinion, as that’s certainly debatable.

    However, on fuel economy, I think a great deal depends on whose figures one accepts. The EU rates the smart fortwo at a combined city/highway fuel economy of 50 miles per (US) gallon, but the US EPA only rates it at a combined 36 miles per (US) gallon.

    The Chevy Spark gets 34 and spots you two extra seats and less NVH in the bargain. Sure, it’s front-wheel drive, but other than that, is one MPG per extra seat too much of a sacrifice?

  • smartacus

    Yep.  By your own reply; you are absolutely correct P.F.: It was categorically wrong for him to write “substandard fuel economy”  even when compared to a FWD Chevy Spark which has two extra seats.

     Imagine if he wrote an article describing the Spark as having “substandard fuel economy” because the Mazda5 has an extra row of seats, holds a ton more cargo, and tows a larger trailer.

    *He can write about worst car on the road today or  horrifying driving experience all he wants.  That’s still OK, that’s just personal opinion.  But once he crosses the line and starts writing non-truths about it- and then another non-truth; he loses that all important journalistic credibility that takes years to build up and minutes to lose, and razes the entire AUTOGUIDE down to nothing more than a blog that any valley girl can write.

  • Beauregard Jackson

    Can you people lay off? This whole line of discussion is absurd. While AutoGuide clearly would have escorted any other writer to the curb after such an egregious assault against the noble smart fortwo, Mr. Cole is a high-functioning mentally disabled person.

    I for one (by the way “forone” would be a fantastic name for a smart brand motorcycle) think the fine folks at AG should be offered a hearty handclasp for taking one of society’s whimpering castoffs into their employ. Before Cole rose up the ranks here at everyone’s favorite automotive informational website log, you would not have been surprised to find him swabbing the terracotta tiles or accidentally knocking over your Mr. Pibb at the local Long John Silvers.

    Making offputting Nazi references and calling an automated manual an “automatic”? These are not mere missteps or deliberate slights. This is the stuff of a disease-ravaged mind.

    So folks, I implore you to stop all your hand wringing and instead tip your hats to AutoGuide for taking one for the team. Be happy that this fellow is in his basement playing at being a journalist instead of outside of his van offering passersby bites of his fish sticks.

    P.S. – For all the hatred spewed haplessly by Cole and others about the smart transmission, I cannot bring myself to understand it. Having driven this four-wheeled wonder on multiple occasions, I find I quite like the sensation of a good sphincter clench, which is what happens each time you try to make a left turn through an intersection as the transmission pauses for a moment to shift into the next gear. Plus, my doctor tells me it’s good exercise for my heart. He’s a Ph. D. but still.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Richard-Valdez/1363915467 Richard Valdez

    LOL!!! the smart  in first place!!! 370Z should be at least top three !!

  • http://dbcooper.livejournal.com P.F. Bruns

    This would make sense if the Mazda5 were in the same class of car, as the Chevy Spark and the smart fortwo are.

    Both the Spark and the smart fortwo are classified as city cars. The Mazda5 is an MPV.

  • smartacus

    I believe you meant to say “ This would make sense if the Spark were RWD”

      *feel free to re-read the title of the article where it mentions something about um… what’s it called again- 
    Oh yeah, Rear-Wheel-Drive Cars

  • http://dbcooper.livejournal.com P.F. Bruns

     You don’t get to tell me what I meant to say. I said what I meant. I was comparing cars in the same class, regardless of drivetrain, and you weren’t. That the Spark is front-drive is immaterial for my comparison; it just means that the Spark didn’t qualify to be included in this article.

    FYI, neither would the front-drive Mazda5 (also available in four-wheel drive, but not rear-drive).

    So, snarkatus, please feel free to keep moving the goal posts, but you’re still going to fall short of the mark.

    You remain wrong.

  • smartacus

     Okaaaay so you meant what you said.

    Not only is Spark being front-drive NOT immaterial for your consumption comparison; in fact, it’s the most important aspect.

     At this time; I should introduce you to a brilliant discovery they call “physics”.
    Say it with me: fizix.  Very good!!  

    In this wonderful discipline “physics”  we find the axiom:
    IT TAKES LESS EFFORT TO PULL THAN PUSH

    Tomorrow, we learn about ” the birds and the bees”
                                                                           -snarkatus ;)

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/3Y7XQFATNLYKNHD6WGJUWHCXYQ JT

    Scion IQ. 36 in town 37 on the highway. smart is 34/38. The IQ has 36.5 combined to smarts 36. Before you point out the smart has better highway MPG, lost of cars are rated at 38-40 on the highway. so no its not the best.

  • smartacus

    What do you mean lots of cars? 
    As in lots of cars that just came out in the last 16 months maybe?

    -And most of those wouldn’t even be around if it weren’t for three things:
    gas prices lifting off into orbit
    CAFE increases signed into law scheduled to start kicking in for 2016
    and seeing smart doing it.

    *For a Rear Wheel Drive car that was introduced way back in 2007 and is still the thriftiest non-hybrid non-diesel non-Geo… Not only is it incorrect to  say “it’s not the best”; but it’s incorrect to say “it’s one of the best”

  • John

    the  2013 Hyundai Elantra should be included with the most popular compact cars,much more reliable than the Caolla.

  • Alfred Bundy

    How can you not just LAUGH at anyone who drives a smart golf cart!  What a joke that is.  And I have a bridge to sell you if you believe the safety data on it!

  • Daz

    What a joke list. Waste of time reading it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/randy.robertson.940 Randy Robertson

    Well even though it only gets 16 MPG , I won’t give up my 2011 Wrangler Unlimited,I don’t care what the Government says!!! The U.S. Government can kiss my Red White & Blue , Jeep Driving American Ass..

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100005098265793 Michael Todd

    Honda S2000 oh yea u forgot about this powerhouse!

  • Daniel Hannestad

    The cars are rated after price. :-)

  • Sky

    “Curiously named”? Instant loss of credibilty as a car person. Chevy has been badging their cars with the Super Sport logo, since they first sold the package on the 1961 Impala. The package was for ever linked with classic high performance Chevy V8 muscle cars like the Camaro, Chevelle, El Camino, Monte Carlo, and Nova and of course the Impala. Nazis? Ships? Are you serious? You might as well suggest that Ford’s Famous GT (Grand Turismo) badging might mean, Guatemalan Terrorist. That’s how stupid you sound. If you said that around a group car buffs, they shrug you off and ignore all your comments for the rest of the conversation. You sound like some chick, watching a football game and asking why the guys are all wearing helmets. “Where are they going? Space?” She’s the only one laughing, because she sounds dumb.

  • Sky

    Excuse my several typos. I meant, *forever*, *Gran Turismo* and *they would shrug you off*. Ford boldly borrowed GT from the Italians who badged cars like Ferrari with the grand touring designation. I’m sorry, but anyone who cracks dumb Nazi jokes, like they’ve never heard of GM’s long standing Super Sport line, does not sound very car savvy to me. I mean come on! The SS badging has been on GM products for well over 50 years now. It’s only “curiously named” if you know absolutely nothing about GM cars.