Fiat Could Kill off Dodge by 2016: Report

52
Fiat Could Kill off Dodge by 2016: Report

Dodge’s ranks have been thinning ever since RAM took over the pickup truck business, and next year, Chrysler’s volume brand will cease production of the Avenger, leaving behind a gaping hole in its lineup. This raises the question: Is Dodge headed for the crusher?

With these products gone or going, the alarming question has been raised by Ward’s Auto in a recent report outlining the product shortages at Dodge. And the death of new models is going to get worse, Ward’s reports, citing inside sources that at least two more products are already being prepared for migration to Chrysler or discontinuation. Those vehicles are likely the Dodge Grand Caravan, which will probably be sent to Chrysler and sold exclusively as the Town and Country, and the Avenger, which we already know is set to be discontinued.

That leaves Dodge with the Durango, Challenger, Charger, Dart and Journey. The latter two now ride on Fiat derived platforms. The Dart is currently built at the brand’s Belvidere, IL, plant and will be joined by the Chrysler 100 in 2016, while the Dodge Journey/Fiat Freemont replacement is set to be built in Sterling Heights, MI. Thanks to platform sharing, both the Dart and Journey will have a Chrysler or Fiat equivalent vehicle that can step in as their replacement. As for the Challenger, rumors have been circulating about the the Barracuda nameplate being revived and stepping in as a Challenger replacement, possibly as a second stand-alone product under the new SRT brand – the first product being the new Viper.

The Charger doesn’t have a direct copy that could spin off into another Chrysler brand, but the 300 could theoretically pick up the slack, while the Durango is already built alongside the more popular Jeep Grand Cherokee on the same underpinnings.

So it does seam feasible that Dodge could be discontinued and its products spread out between other Chrysler nameplates, but whether or not Fiat wants to keep Dodge around for the long term is another question unto itself. The year 2016 will mark the climax of several product upgrades and manufacturing changes for Chrysler, all of which started in 2009 when Fiat took an equity stake in the company. If Fiat is looking to dump the Dodge brand, it will be decided by 2016 once all of these manufacturing changes take place.

[Source: Ward’s Auto]

  • MistyGreen

    No way. There’s no way they’d throw out such a high-profile brand. If they were smart, they’d move Chrysler upmarket, so in a couple years Fiat/Chrysler could actually compete in the premium markets, and leave Fiat as a niche, Euro-flaired brand.

  • repealobamacare

    What is Fiat’s niche? Unreliable, quirky cars? I certainly hope they’ve improved since they were exorcised from the US market decades ago…….

    .

  • MistyGreen

    It’s worked for BMW with Mini. I think it’s the only shot Fiat has in America. They’ll never be mainstream in my lifetime, that’s for sure.

  • repealobamacare

    BMW never had a reputation for building crappy cars like Fiat does. And I don’t think the mini brand will be viable for much longer. VW couldn’t sell just air cooled beetles forever, they eventually had to innovate and offer new products.

    Fiat cannot just sell 500’s – they’ll need to start selling other models to become a viable brand here in America.

    Their “multi-air” variable lift system is cool, but what happens to the valve train when oil changes get neglected. A ticking valve lifter is one thing, but now the valve lift control is your throttle! Only time will tell…….

    .

  • DodgeRob

    One thing to remember is Fiat owns not just Chrysler but also Alfa Romeo, Lancia, Maserati, and Ferrari. Dodge is nowhere near as important to Fiat as Jeep is which sells to the same people that buy Range Rovers and BMW X-series.A Huge money maker.

  • Benjamin B.

    Bring over the FIAT Panda 4×4 and the 500X (lifted 500L).

  • David

    You guys like making stuff up or what?

  • smartacus

    I’m totally cool with it. The Dodge Brothers aren’t around to notice.

  • repealobamacare

    Part of why Fiat wanted Chrysler was for its vast dealer network, so they can peddle their Fiat cars here again. First a little badge engineering with the Dart and Journey – next they’ll be selling Fiat’s and Alfa’s……..

    .

  • Benjamin B.

    I’m more inclined to purchase an Alfa or FIAT than a Dodge.

  • NJL

    No worries – the Chrysler/Fiat marriage will only last a few years anyways

  • DodgeRob

    I disagree. Where Daimler kept Mercedes and Chrysler products completely separate with just shared engineering and parts, Fiat is going all out with full platform sharing. The Dart may be a Fiat/Alfa platform but the new Maserati Suv is a Jeep Grand Cherokee with a Ferrari sourced Engine. Fun times to be a Mopar Maniac.

  • Aaron

    “Daimler kept Mercedes and Chrysler products completely separate..”?
    Ever hear of the Chrysler Crossfire? More than just a little shared engineering and parts.

  • DodgeRob

    You are correct Aaron on the crossfire, name some more please.

  • Aaron

    With a name like “DodgeRob,” I’m sure you know more about this than I do, so I suspect you are funnin’ me. But I’ll bite:

    How about the 300? Six years ago, depending on what engine you got, the transmission could be mercedes, the complete front and rear suspensions were mercedes, the differentials, and alot of the electronics were mercedes. Half of the parts on the car actually have mercedes part numbers along side the mopar part number.

    PS- I’m a fan of dogpile. I never use google when I’m looking for something on the net to make me look smart.

  • Benjamin B.

    The eight speed is sourced by ZF of Germany. The Ram trucks use the same transmission as Rolls Royce, with a dial in place of the shifter.

  • Benjamin B.

    The 300 is an E Class underneath.

  • James Clements

    Incorrect. Most of the LX platform engineering was done before Daimler took over. The only Mercedes parts are the 5 speed tranny, rear axle, some seat parts, and I believe some steering column components, all added by Daimler to benefit economies of scale.

  • Benjamin B.

    The Crossfire was based on the then previous generation M-B SLK-Class roadster.

  • greg sampson

    After spending that much money to purchase Chrysler why would they (fiat) want to slit there own throat ???? Idiots! French need we say any more.

  • ColumWood

    To play the devil’s advocate. First, they’re just be killing Dodge, not Chrysler, or Jeep. Second… they’d do it as part of a larger plan to get Fiat into the lucrative North American marketplace.

  • PJM361

    Actually, pot calling the kettle black, they’re Italian.

  • ramblergarage

    French?? Sorry but Fiat is Italian. Renault, Peugeot are French.

  • PRGAIN

    Yes, it’s Italian as in “Fix It Again Tony”

  • PJM361

    I think the biggest mistake is changing the names to Ram & SRT. It all started when the R/T wasn’t the highest performance model of each model. The truck name change is also silly because they are still sold in the same place. It’s hard to have brand loyalty when they keep changing. Also the exterior styling of the older Avenger/Stratus was better than the newer Avenger which they tried to make look like a smaller version of the Charger and it didn’t come out right.

  • Benjamin B.

    Again, how was the Stratus styling better?

  • Evan hutson

    This article is useless… Just here to ruffle feathers. Dodge will lose a car in a category, yes but a gapng hole??? How many vehicles did they come out with in the past few years? Challenger and the Dart. Making up for any avenger losses I’m sure. They still have their big sellers of the Caravan and the Charger. This was eventually going to happen to the Avenger it was just a plain Jane 4-door where people who wanted a charger will be drawn toward the 4-door stead Charger or the fuel economic dart. Dodge has a characteristic of having sporty cars, and the avenger didnt fit. Dodge will stay.

    If you are worried about how Chrysler and dodge share some of the same ‘underpinning’ look at GMC and Chevrolet. Every vehicle they make do the same thing. It allows for mass production of faster without loss of time re-caliberating their factories. This is just some place and writer who wanted to try and make a name for himself with a front page article and it worked but it is still useless.

  • ramblergarage

    you hit the nail on the head!!

  • Benjamin B.

    Challenger will soon be replaced. The minivans will be replaced by a series of full sized crossovers, as GM did with its minivans. The next generation Charger could go away, as Sergio does not like brand overlapping (such as what GM famously does). Heck, the Caravan could go away also. If the Durango is remade into a Jeep model, Dodge could become America’s premier compact brand. I should not keep saying this. Like Beetlejuice, it probably will become fact.

  • Joe Smith

    Hmm It’s 2014, I have a 2014 Challenger R/T. 2015 Challengers to include a 707hp Challenger SRT Hellcat and at least 5 different variations of Challengers are available. I guess by soon you meant 5 years.

  • Al

    This article is total horsesh*t – drawing ridiculous conclusions to try and patch together a scenario for the Dodge brand going away.

    Mr Elmer, I hope AutoGuide didn’t pay you very much to write this.

  • posuprstar

    Wait, are you suggesting that Fiat might get the f*ck out of Dodge?

  • Joe Smith

    Okay that was funny

  • Hudson

    The original article isn’t as far fetched as this version makes it seem. The Journey actually becomes a Chrysler product. The Durango is replaced by the Jeep Grand Wagoneer. What’s left other than the Charger and Dart?

  • Joe W

    The Challeger ?

  • Benjamin B.

    SRT Barracuda.

  • Tallen94

    They need another affordable two door sports car with a turbo engine. The Dart is sharp, but I hate that it is a 4 door. I like the 90’s Daytona’s, the Eagle Talons, the 2004 Stratus R/T. I hate 4 door sports cars. Retro style and use some old name plates. The Challegers are nice, but who wants a base model V6, the Hemi’s are so expensive.

  • stringslapper

    Just look at the sales figures, Chrysler brand sales are going downhill, they can’t recall Jeeps fast enough, on the other hand, the old Dodge brand just keeps on churning out higher sales each month with old technology platforms. Why? because it’s a Dodge and that’s what people want. Wake up Marchione! Don’t be another Iacocca and sell us down the river…Bob Lutz was the man by the way!!!

  • Benjamin B.

    The Dodge brand is junk. Buy a Dodge, need a new car in a few years. The Jeep Grand Cherokee (the higher trimmed models) is a good truck, although it is based on the old M-B ML-Class but worked over by Jeep. The Durango is just an extended wheelbase variant, and therefor could easily be replaced with a new Commander or Wagoneer model. The Challenger, based on the E-Class Mercedes, is much heavier than and not as fun as the pony car competition. The Charger is alright if you are a gangster, athlete, rapper or lesbian, but the Chrysler 300 is better just because it is. The Dart is a half-assed creation. Parts of it like the Alfa platform are good, but others like the mediocre performing engines are so-so. The 2.4L is the one engine to have, skip the turbocharged unit. The upcoming Journey promises to be good, like a cheaper base model Cherokee. Dodge is set to become the premier inexpensive starter compact car brand.

  • James Clements

    Dodge junk? The Challenger is in the top 10 in resale value. Junk doesn’t make it in the top 10 of this list. You just can’t fix stupid. I can see by your comments that you are just a Dodge hater and have no useful information here.

  • Joe Smith

    Again you troll. Nobody can be that ignorant

  • Railroad Lover61

    The Company should keep the Dodge Brand going as a medium priced auto that most people can afford. Chrysler on the other hand should be marketed as a Luxury brand like it used to be.(remember the Chrysler Imperial?) The ugley Fiat 500 on the other hand should be buried 120 feet underground. Even the Dart gets better Gas Mileage! And a better value too!
    The Chrysler 200 needs an styling overhaul as well as the Dodge Avenger. Keep both minivans and do a crossover for those who don’t want a minivan and badge it Dodge.

  • Benjamin B.

    Sergio doesn’t like product overlap. The Durango is an extended wheelbase Jeep Grand Cherokee and is a direct replacement of the Jeep Commander. The Durango, dare I say, can be remade into a new Jeep Wagoneer. The heavy E-Class-based Challenger and set to expire. The former will be replaced by a new SRT Barracuda and the latter will be replaced probably (speculating) by the next generation Chrysler 300, leaving an exclusively compact (dare I say that) Dodge lineup. The Avenger, which has a name middle school-aged boys know and love very well, will be discontinued when the new 200 is introduced. The Chrysler company mini/medium-sized vans are rumoured to be replaced by a full-sized crossover vehicle, as GM did. Ram trucks will import one smaller van (to replace the Ram C/V) and one larger van (rear-wheel drive to compete with the M-B Sprinter and Ford Transit) from Europe within the next coming years. The future looks like as if Dodge will become a compact automaker. Bye, bye muscle cars.

  • Joe Smith

    Troll. It’s been 2 years since your post and the Challenger has had record sales. It may get a redesign in 2018, or they might name it a Barracuda, in any case it will still be a muscle car. And Ford will have the Mustang, and hopefully a Ford RS, and Chevy will have the Camaro. Still muscle cars.

  • Apache

    I DONT THINK DODGE WILL DIE…IT WILL MULTIPLY.THEY NEED TO BRING THAT GOOD OL MUSCLE CARS BACK….EACH ONE OF THEM, CLOSE TO ORIGINAL BODY STYLES. I THINK DODGE GOT THE SEXIEST CARS OUT THERE PERIOD.

  • Benjamin B.

    These “muscle cars” you speak of are crazy expensive to drive and maintain. Anyway, the heavy Dodge Charger and Dodge Challenger both will be replaced soon. The Challenger, which has a hard time competing with the likes of the lighter Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camero, is already set to be discontinued and replaced with a lighter SRT model. The Charger sedan has been “face lifted” once, while the technical specs have stayed the same. The Challenger and Charger share a platform with the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Magnum (rebadged as a Chrysler 300 variant in Europe), which rely on the old M-B E-Class underpinnings. A replacement is very unlikely since the Italian-Canadian FIAT-Chrysler boss doesn’t like product overlapping in markets. A new large Chrysler model is more likely. As for the Durango, since it is basically an extended wheelbase, seven-passenger version of the Jeep Grand Cherokee five-passenger SUV, it would be easy to remake into a Jeep model: reintroduce either the Commander or Wagoneer nameplates. Anyway, the M-B ML-Class platform the Grand Cherokee and current Durango (old one was based on Ram and Dakota underpinnings) share will need to be updated in several years, as M-B and Chrysler are divorced much like Ford and Mazda. The crossover SUV Journey will soon share platforms with the Alfa-based Dart as well. If the Durango is replaced with a Jeep model and the Charger is discontinued, Dodge will become an exclusively compact brand. Did I just say that?

  • Justin Johnson

    It’s always funny when people like you are proven wrong. The whole thing you wrote showed you was talking out your ass.

    And since was these cars crazy expensive to drive and maintain? lol

  • Joe Smith

    Exactly. I have a Challenger R/T, great car, not anymore expensive to maintain than any other new car in the market, in some cases less. I had a Challenger SXT, that was a great car with good mpg for its size and weight. It’s been 2 years since Ben’s original post, so far he’s been wrong

  • Chris Winter

    Just sell the Charger and Challenger in Australia FFS!!!!!!! Chrysler 300 SRT8 (I own a 5.7 06 300C) is the only affordable option over hear. I WANT A CHALLENGER!!!!

  • Vasya Bricklyn

    Good riddance. Want a 70’s throwback, men? Be one and build it yourself.

  • Jacob

    You shouldn’t get rid of dodge if dodge dies i wouldn’t ever buy a Chrysler and I would still want a ram but if it’s like junk because it seprate from dodge i would buy another chryser product

  • MGM46

    This is the middle of 2016 – someone missed the boat on this one.

« Back
SWEEPSTAKES – OFFICIAL RULES, TERMS AND CONDITIONS

AutoGuide.com’s Monthly Overlay Newsletter Signup – By subscribing to our email newsletter, Entrants are eligible to win one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card (value of $100.00 USD). One (1) winner will be chosen every month at random and contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. *Amazon.com is not a sponsor of this promotion. Except as required by law, Amazon.com Gift Cards ("GCs") cannot be transferred for value or redeemed for cash. GCs may be used only for purchases of eligible goods at Amazon.com or certain of its affiliated websites. For complete terms and conditions, see www.amazon.com/gc-legal. GCs are issued by ACI Gift Cards, Inc., a Washington corporation. All Amazon ®, ™ & © are IP of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. No expiration date or service fees.

1. NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT OF ANY KIND IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN THIS SWEEPSTAKES. AGE/RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS, VOID WHERE PROHIBITED.

2. PRIZE: One (1) Winner will be randomly selected every month to each receive: one (1) $100.00 Amazon.com Gift Card (the “Prize Supplier”). Total approximate retail value of all prizes is approximately $100.00 USD. Prizes are not transferable and no cash or prize substitution is allowed. Prize package is awarded "as is" with no warranty or guarantee, either express or implied.

3. ELIGIBILITY: From the time of entry through the final date of prize fulfillment, each contest entrant and selected entrant must be a permanent lawful citizen and resident residing in the 50 United States or the District of Columbia or in Canada, and be twenty one (21) years of age or older. VOID IN PUERTO RICO, THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, IN ALL FOREIGN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ALL OTHER U.S. TERRITORIES OR CANADA AND POSSESSIONS AND WHERE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. Employees, officers, directors, agents and representatives, of the Sponsor and the Prize Supplier and each of their respective parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, promotion partners and any entity involved in the development, production, implementation, administration or fulfillment of this Sweepstakes, and the immediate family members (e.g., spouse, mother, father, sister, brother, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, grandparent, in-law, daughter and son, regardless of where they live) and persons living in the same household (whether or not related) of such individuals are not eligible to participate or win. Only one selected entrant per household. All decisions of the Sponsor with respect to this sweepstakes are final. The Sponsor shall have the right at any time to require proof of identity and failure to provide such proof may result in disqualification from the Sweepstakes.

4. ENTER BY INTERNET: You may enter this sweepstakes via the Internet by logging onto AutoGuide.com and subscribing to our email newsletter via the pop-up overlay.

5. SELECTION OF WINNER: One (1) Entrant will be selected by random selection who have subscribed to our email newsletter. The winner may be announced publicly on AutoGuide.com and will be contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. The winner will be required to provide a mailing address (that is not a P.O. box) to receive the prize which will be shipped free of charge.

6. ODDS OF WINNING: Odds of winning a prize are determined by the total number of eligible entries received.

7. RESTRICTIONS: The prize package consists of one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card with an approximate value of $100.00 USD. If prize cannot be awarded due to circumstances beyond the control of the Sponsor or Prize Supplier, no substitute prize will be awarded due to the unique nature of the prize. Sponsor and Prize Supplier shall not be liable to the winner or any person claiming through winner for failure to supply the prize or any part thereof, by reason of any acts of God, any action(s), regulation(s), order(s) or request(s) by any governmental or quasi-governmental entity (whether or not the action(s), regulations(s), order(s) or request(s) prove(s) to be invalid), equipment failure, utility failure, internet failure, terrorist acts, threatened terrorist acts, air raid, blackout, act of public enemy, earthquake, war (declared or undeclared), fire, flood, epidemic, explosion, unusually severe weather, hurricane, embargo, labor dispute or strike (whether legal or illegal) labor or material shortage, transportation interruption of any kind, work slow-down, civil disturbance, insurrection, riot, or any other cause beyond Sponsor's or Prize Supplier's control (collectively, "Force Majeure Event"). Sponsor shall not be responsible for any cancellations, delays, diversions or substitutions or any act or omissions whatsoever by the performers/events, other transportation companies or any other persons providing any of these services and accommodations to passengers including any results thereof such as changes in services or accommodations necessitated by same.

8. CONDITIONS: By entering the Sweepstakes, entrants agree to be bound by the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions and that Sponsor has the irrevocable right to use in perpetuity entrants' names, user names, likenesses, photographs, voices, home mailing address, biographical and prize information, and entry materials, without notice to entrants and without compensation or obligation, in any and all media now or hereafter known throughout the world, in any manner whatsoever, to advertise and promote Sponsor, its products and services, the Sweepstakes, and for any other purpose except where prohibited by law. Entrant waives the right to assert as a cost of winning a prize any and all costs of verification and redemption or travel to redeem said prize and any liability which might arise from redeeming or seeking to redeem said prize. Sponsor is not responsible for fraudulent calls or emails made to entrants not by the Sponsor. If the Sweepstakes is not capable of running as planned by reason of damage by computer viruses, worms or bugs, tampering, unauthorized intervention, fraud, technical limitations or failures, any Force Majeure Event or any other cause which, in the sole opinion of Sponsor, could corrupt, compromise, undermine or otherwise affect the administration, security, fairness, integrity, viability or proper conduct of the Sweepstakes, Sponsor reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend all or any part of the Sweepstakes, and to select a winner from among all eligible entries received by Sponsor up until the time of such cancellation, termination, modification or suspension, as applicable. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual that (i) tampers or attempts to tamper with the entry process or the operations of this Sweepstakes in any manner, (ii) violates the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions or (iii) acts in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner, or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other person. CAUTION: ANY ATTEMPT BY AN ENTRANT OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THIS SWEEPSTAKES IS A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS. SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND/OR DAMAGES FROM ANY SUCH PERSON TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. Any expenses and receipt and use of the prize and federal, state and local taxes and fees applicable in connection with the prize awarded are the sole responsibility of the winner. An IRS Form 1099 will be issued in the name of the winner for the actual value of the prize received. This Sweepstakes is subject to all federal, state and local laws of the United States. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. Sponsor, Prize Supplier, and their respective officers, directors, parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries and advertising and promotion agencies, employees, representatives and agents are not responsible for and shall not be liable for (i) any injuries, losses or damages of any kind caused by a prize resulting from acceptance, possession or usage of the prize, or (ii) printing, distribution or production errors. Sponsor or its affiliates may rescind any promotion found to contain such errors without liability at its or their sole discretion.

9. SPONSOR: The Sponsor of this contest is VerticalScope Inc. (the owner and operator of AutoGuide.com), 111 Peter Street, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1.

Subscribe to our email newsletter and automatically be entered to win.
*Restrictions apply. See offer for details

Get Breaking Automotive News, Reviews and Video in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked