2013-2014 Midsize Sedan Comparison

2013-2014 Midsize Sedan Comparison

Thinking of buying a Honda Accord? Click here.

Thinking of buying a Hyundai Sonata? Click here.

Thinking of buying a Kia Optima? Click here.

Thinking of buying a Mazda6? Click here.

Thinking of buying a Nissan Altima? Click here.

Thinking of buying a Subaru Legacy? Click here.

Thinking of buying a Toyota Camry? Click here.

Thinking of buying a Volkswagen Passat? Click here.

  • MistyGreen

    You know what would be COOL? Making a tool out of that chart that would allow users to input a different weight for each row, or mark “less important” or “more important” or something. I’m rooting for you, Autoguide. I’ve been wanting to see a review of all the competitors here for a while.

    Overall, great points in the reviews given the space allowed to talk about each vehicle. Also, I can share this because the Mazda won. :)

  • Pete

    To bad Ford and Chevy didn’t show… My guess is that Ford would easily net second or third, pushing Passat out.

    Anyway, good review/comparison, Mazda 6 deserves the win in most listed categories (from looks, to handling / fuel economy); Ford must have kept Mazda’s engineers and designers locked up somewhere all these years, lol.

    No seriously, I was considering buying a new CLA, but I will have to test drive the new 6 before I fork out $30k+ for a “baby” CLS.

  • Alfie

    Don’t get me wrong, I think the CLA is awesome, but it’s full of cutbacks. The car has a hood prop… not hydraulics. I wonder where else they cut corners.

  • Alfie

    Um, Passat in 2nd, what are you guys smoking?

  • Waynerm002

    The Optima in the video has the 18″ wheels from the SX and is listed as an EX Luxury with a price of $32,729. I am not aware of an EX-L model in the lineup. A fully loaded US SX is $32,470, while a loaded EX is $29,520. Where are these prices coming from? Something is fishy here.

  • Mike Schlee

    You are correct. We had a Optima EX with some dealer installed accessories, like the 18″ wheels. I have corrected the information and adjusted the final scores.

  • NickB


    I think using a non stock EX takes a bit of the fairness away from the Optima. The EX only comes with the 17″ wheels, and the 18″ SX wheels are not an “optional accessory” (neither are the SX tail lights). My issue is that the EX was designed to have 17″ wheels, and thus the ride/handling and fuel economy got lower marks than a “true” EX would have. This would have put the Optima at or above the Sonata’s rating.

    Also, what would the Kia’s price rating be without these added parts from an SX model?

  • Mike Schlee

    Most likely tied the Camry and Subaru for 6th place.

  • bd005

    You guys are the OUTLIER – in the other comparisons of midsizers, the Optima regularly beats the Camry, Sonata and Altima.

  • aolbites

    I’d like to know the same thing. It’s hardly fair to compare the price of a loaded model vs unloaded models and gasp at the price difference.

  • alanbala

    I drive a 2013 Kia Optima EX, and frankly, I can’t understand what your complaint is about the transmission, or the ride and handling. FYI the trunk is the same size as the Hyundai, and it is huge. In just shy of 10,000 miles of driving, the only complaint is that the fuel economy numbers don’t live up to the EPA estimates, and the car came with a tire inflation kit in place of a spare tire (we bought the spare tire & jack kit–maybe it’s the extra weight that lowers mpg, although I doubt it). We tested some of the other cars, and the choice was the Kia, hands down!

  • aolbites

    Same here, 2012 Kia Optima SX, love that car. Have noticed the slightest bit of engine noise, but it’s not over the top. Plus, mine was way under the price that they paid for the EX (dunno how they did that). And I was amazed that the Sonata came in a different place when they’re essentially the same car with the Sonata being uglier IMHO.

  • MS3 Owner

    Maybe this will finally get people to start thinking differently about Mazda!

  • smartacus

    WOW. I’m surprised the AWD Subaru is that affordable and gets that good gas mileage

  • Robby G

    Yea, but did you see the interior? It looked like garbage…. no wonder it’s so cheap.

  • Richard Joash Tan


  • aolbites

    It is complete crap. I drove in one before buying and it sucked. It felt like I should get so much more for how much I would be paying.

  • Paul Palumbo Jr.

    How convienient… all Jap/Foreign Cars… BS on the decline too – I think this site is biased
    I have a 2011 Chrysler 2011 and <3 it! Loaded too!

  • Gavin

    Typical white trash comment… Sure, a website based in North America is biased against American cars.

  • Paul Palumbo Jr.

    White Trash?!?! Wow!!!!!!!! Is that a racist comment?!
    What I’m saying/doing is called SUPPORTING AMERICA, buying Japanese cars, does NOT support America! Fool! Just because cars are made here, doesn’t mean the majority of profits go into our country! Idiot!

  • Gavin

    Typical STUPID white trash comment.

  • Rick Vieira

    Id rather buy a Japanese Car made in America than an American car made in Mexico. Its a world market now. Get with the times.

  • Paul Palumbo Jr.

    And what car are you referring to that is made in Mexico?
    Get with the times??? No, get with it PERIOD… stop supporting these overseas companies with our $$ and buying the UGLY POS cars!

  • aolbites

    You’re dumb, you don’t know what you’re talking about. American cars are put together in other countries, manufacturer’s from other countries assemble their cars here. Either way it’s supporting American workers. In the end, the highest quality car should win, not purely because the car was built in ‘murka

  • Jay Last

    A racist is someone who still uses the phrase “Jap” in 2013.

  • wow

    LOL buying a Japanese car built in the state doesn’t support america? lol wow first of all, government earn tax on multiple level, and pays AMERICAN worker, who also pay tax for their earnings.

  • Luis A. Martinez

    Chrysler 200 is base on a Mitsubishi chassis,engine and such (fiat re-design just the interior and some stuff but the main car was create by a foreign company,don’t know why you are so upset,many Escalades,Yukon,Suburban,Sunfire,Cavalier are made in Mexico and America is made of immigrants too)

  • Phil

    …to each their own … but the accord will without a doubt be more reliable than the VW or the mazda,.. and also gets the best fuel efficiency … that’s my no.1
    (FYI i worked at both a vw and mazda dealer in the service department)

  • Gavin

    Mazda just won both Consumer Reports and KBB’s lowest cost to own awards (for non-Luxury brands), so I’m not sure how your “without a doubt be more reliable” prediction will play out. According the publications that do this for a living you should have some debt.

    The Accord and the Mazda6 were rated at 29.8 and 29.4 respectively. In an “observed MPG” test list this one that is a statistical tie.

  • Phil

    its simple, publications make predictions … when you work in the shop, you see what really happens. I have no doubt.

  • z2cents

    There is a reason these rankings do not reflect actual sales

  • Gavin

    People are stupid?

  • Richard Joash Tan



    Actually, the Tesla Model S is a bullshit, much like the Mazda6 and Subaru.

    Long live the Camry, ruler of the sedan world!!!

  • Richard Joash Tan


  • Gavin

    You mean YOU YELL!!!!!!!

  • humongous

    The Ayatolla of Road Roller!!

  • Tomas E.

    TESLA MODEL S is 120 thousand man :-) Please I prefer 4-5 Mazda6s instead of one surely nice and fast MODEL S… Drivers car is 6 so I want 6.

  • Tomas E.

    In EUROPE I mean 120.000 USD – in US it is cheaper 70-100? I guess so 3 Mazdas only :-)

  • aolbites

    actually after rebate the low end S starts at 55.

  • MetalMania

    For those of you saying Mazda isn’t reliable, I don’t know where you get that. I’ve been driving a 1st generation 6 daily for 9 years and haven’t had any problems. Other than oil and filter changes the hood may as well be bolted shut. I have no fear about reliability with Mazda, they have earned my trust.

    Why are you even mentioning Tesla after a comparison like this? It’s a completely different class of car, other than having 4 wheels and seats. The Model S rocks, but when Tesla makes a more mainstream car with a 200 hp equivalent output and a 300 – 400 mile battery range costing under $35,000 loaded, then it’s closer to being a real comparison in this category.

    Every time I read a comparo like this, people start saying “oh, this site is biased” and “there’s no way that car is really better than my (brand x)”, as if the reviewer has just personally insulted you. As they said at the end of the review, there really isn’t a “bad” one in the bunch. Depending on your priorities, there’s something here for you. It shouldn’t really surprise anyone that Mazda made a great car – they had to. They are a small company fighting for survival. I’ll be the first to admit that they don’t make the universal appliance (Camry) that sells the most. That’s the point I think, they build cars for a niche that’s almost mainstream but a little bit on the enthusiast side. That’s me. Because I drive a Mazda, I suppose one of you will call me a “fanboy”. Well, I am a fan. They make cars that resonate with me and what I want and need in a car. I don’t blindly love and accept everything that they do, they are by no means perfect or the ultimate auto maker. If Accord/Camry/Altima/etc. are better for YOU then that’s great, they’re all good cars and nobody should think lesser of you for it, but don’t start crying foul when the underdog shows up and someone thinks it’s better either.

  • Jay Last

    So let me get this straight: because you like your Mazda, every Mazda made is reliable? Uh huh.

  • Gavin

    No. But winning the Consumer Reports and KBB reliability award (for non-luxury brands, Lexus won the Luxury award) means that they probably will be.

    Just because your Accord has HORRENDOUS ride quality means all Accords do?

  • Jay Last

    Actually it does, because they are all made with the same suspension and parts.

    Go ahead and enjoy your Mazda; nobody is stopping you.

  • MetalMania

    No, it doesn’t mean that every one is reliable. But it doesn’t mean that the rest are junk either. I’m sure there are plenty of people that will tell horror stories about unreliable Mazdas, as well as every other make of car out there. Don’t put words in my mouth, should I take your response and say that you mean that nobody has ever had a problem with a Honda or Toyota? I don’t think so. To say that Mazdas in general are unreliable is inaccurate. So what, you want me to think I got the only good one?

  • Jay Last

    Well that is quite the incomprehensible word-salad. Your exact words were “I don’t know where you’re getting that, I haven’t had any problems”. Therefore you have just stated that because you haven’t had any problems with your ONE car, then you don’t believe people who say Mazdas are unreliable.

    The lack of intelligence on the internet is astounding sometimes.

  • MistyGreen

    It might be a bit more intelligent if you and your high horse kept to yourselves. It was a comment to say Mazda has earned his trust, and you can’t say that Mazdas are all unreliable.

  • MetalMania

    Obviously Jay you want to take what I said and twist it to fit what you want it to be. I’m sorry if my exact words gave you the wrong idea, but I think it’s fairly obvious the point I was trying to make. Please spare me your aloof interpretation about my “lack of intelligence” because of the imperfect comments I made about a car and my perception of its manufacturer. I didn’t think I had to craft my statement to an unconditional level of perfection, excluding any possibility of anyone making a leap to think I meant that NO ONE ever had a problem with their Mazda. If someone says they had a problem with their Mazda, I never said I don’t believe them. I’m pretty sure we can find someone who has had a problem with every make of car in the world, but it doesn’t mean that all of those manufacturers therefore should be labeled as “unreliable”. There, maybe I should have said that instead.

    The level of arrogance on the internet is astounding sometimes.

  • bd005

    Based on the latest reliability surveys, Mazda has been moving on up and is better than say, Nissan.

  • sage

    that is not the point. I am buying a midsize and while I love the mazda 6, if I took out the looks/paint, I cannot see how its more value than the Honda or Altima. I dont find them exciting but they are the sensible decisions. I never buy sensible cars though!

  • MetalMania

    I think we’ve reached a point in this market segment where they’re all sensible, and it comes down to which “flavor” is right for an individual buyer. “More value” can mean different things for different people, and what features are more important to them.

  • Jay Last

    I own the Accord and to me the ride quality is HORRENDOUS. And I’ve been driving nothing but Hondas for the past 30+ years. They really blew it on this one.

  • Phil

    so the ride is so bad that you didn’t notice it in your test drive and you bought the car anyway…. oh and let me guess, any car hyundai makes has a phenomenal ride! lmao

  • Big J

    What’s with all the techno-crap on these cars you don’t need? I’m looking to buy a new car in the next month or two and no one does a base model compro. I don’t want all that price raising crap, it’s a car, depreciation does not care if u have blind spot monitoring.

  • ScoobaSteve

    As far as base models go, Mazda6 all the way.

  • Sage

    This is weird. I think the Edmunds review has more rigor. You can get a Honda EXL for 26K – Includes sunroof, top end music, displays. The M6 is great to look at but priced 4K higher

  • Katt2102

    In 1990 we had a new baby and bought a Mazda 626 because of its safety features, reliability, etc. Our daughter is 23 now, and driving that old Mazda. I’m a believer in this brand!

  • holly

    This quote is right on the mark:

    “One annoying quirk we noticed with both the Optima and Sonata had to do with an overly aggressive traction control system. Although it took a lot to coax the system to activate during our nice sunny evaluation period, once engaged it’s far too aggressive in cutting power to the front wheels and feels more like the car has actually stalled. In snowy weather this could prove to be infuriating if the system was constantly engaging.”

    I had a 2011 Elantra that acted the exact same way. Sometimes, when cornering a bit too fast, it actually felt like the entire car was cutting power, when in reality, it was just the traction control. Actually a bit scary, knowing that if you were trying to peel out real fast in traffic, that the car was slowing you down so much that you may not make it.

    I now drive a 2012 Nissan Leaf, and it’s much better, even in spite of the high torque.

  • Jeremy Oestreicher

    Except that in the Sonata there’s a switch to turn off the traction control system. I don’t get how you can complain about something you can turn off so easily.

  • bd005

    In all the other mid-size sedan comparisons, the Optima rates higher than both the Sonata and Camry (as well as the Altima).

  • bp923

    mazda should of kept the old rotary engine that was practically indestructible, i own the honda accord and it has a really good feel to but like any car it does have its flaws but overall ill give it 8.5/10

  • jmac146

    Where on earth did this person go shopping at? I bought a nearly loaded 2013 Optima SX TURBO for under $27k. Plus how is it that they say the Sonata is a value when its pretty much the exact same car as the optima with some slightly different style features? Kia and Hyundai are owned by the same company.

  • turnipweed

    I guess they are listing sticker price.

  • GaryEwing

    What kind of “accessories” are you talking about on the Optima? 29K + “thousands in accessories”. Maybe the dealer you shopped at robbed you with 18″ Wheels, which don’t belong on the Optima EX, and LED taillights taken from the SX model and not available, at all from Kia, on the EX model. How can a respectable magazine compare apples and oranges and consider it fair. Maybe insist on having stock vehicles when you are comparing price, road feel, mileage. Putting 18 inch wheels on the EX can affect mileage. Paying thousands for “accessories”, well that’s not the Optima’s fault but the person who bought/reviewed the vehicle. You can get a FULLY loaded EX right now, with the current rebate and every available accessory from Kia (not junk put on by some dealer) for 28500.

    I have no faith in this comparison at all and stopped reading when I found all the issues with how they priced and judged the first vehicle. If you paid for 1000s in unneeded accessories, and compared that price against over vehicles right off the truck, that’s not the vehicle’s fault, go back to car shopping 101..

  • aolbites

    Quotes I had problems with:

    Kia: “Anyone over 6′ tall will find it hard to fit inside this vehicle” I am not small, I’m 6’4″ and a number of pounds and this vehicle is very comfortable. I’ve never felt like I would hit my head or that it was tight.

    Subaru: “Lacking any sort of style inside or out.”

    Altima: “It and the transmission rival the Subaru for the least refined and noisiest.” So, it’s noisiest but a good highway cruiser? I know I definitely enjoy hearing my loud engine while taking a long trip…

    “If you want to be coddled in high luxury (which I didn’t see) and don’t care too much about how a car drives (Why would I?!?! I’m only on a car site checking out the best cars!), the Altima is the car for you.”

    I’d have liked to have seen the reliability for all these cars factored in to the price. The gushing at the end makes this seem like a Mazda ad.

  • OptimasPrimal13

    Ok, like many others said! Your judging is horrid and or biased. I currently own the new 2014 Mazda 6 and a 2013 Kia SX. The Kia on road trips gets better gas mileage than the Mazda. Actual calculated, not what the car computer says. am 6’2 and I feel more comfortable in the Kia. The Kias feel more luxurious on the inside and drives better. I drive 80k+ miles a year for my job, I get a new car once a year. Sales and 9 state territory. If my option doesn’t matter then you need to re-evaluate your own opinions. I typically never buy the same car twice. But I am buying another Kia SX in two months when my current one reaches 85k miles. Kia has been to the shop twice. Once for an alignment and the other the waste gate failed. Service from Kia was impeccable! The Mazda, well the wife can just drive it into the dirt. Beside the fact it has 19k miles on it and its been in the shop 7 times. Electrical, transmission and abs issues. I will take the Kia Optima SX any day!!
    I have owned 30+ cars over the last 19 years. BMW, Mercedes, Lexus, Chrysler, GM, Ford, Subaru, Saab, Saturn, Cadillac, Nissan, Toyota, International, and about anyone you could think of. Kia had came a “LONG” way from the past “disposable car” history. I am a proud Kia Owner! And that’s something I would of never thought I would say!!

  • jestmaty

    Hey guys… the Optima you have pictured is an SX…. the wheels tell me that it is the 275hp turbo model. Get your facts straight if you want credibility

  • Surly Optima

    Yep! Also, the Hyundai Sonata was redesigned in 2011, just like the Kia Optima; not in 2009 as the article states. Autoguide, you fail at writing reviews.

  • pismopal

    I am impressed with Mazda and Honda but prejudiced in favor of anything made in Japan. I realize that some Japanese cars are assembled elsewhere but the new Mazda6 is not. It is made in Japan and I like that. I keep cars for a long time and I don’t like having to repair them. No guarantee but I like the odds.

  • momo

    Every car is the same on this list except for the Subaru. Symmetrical AWD is like bringing a gun to a knife fight.

  • 4wheelpilot

    Let me throw a wrench in this entire comparo…as with some of the other members, I have driven dozens of cars from high performance coupes to luxury sedans to suvs. I recently test drove the M6 2.4 , Honda Accord 4 and v6, Ford Fusion 2.0T, Nissan Altima 4 and 6 and VW Passat and CC. I chose the 2013 Kia Optima SX Turbo. It was better overall by a significant margin (the VW CC is a great car but much more expensive when comparably equipped) including acceleration, handling and features. And was less expensive than any of the v6 cars AND less than the M6 GT with comparable features but with less power and slower paddle shifters. I have had Optima EX loaner but the SX blows it away….obviously in power but also in steering feel, suspension and handling. Autoguide lists the EX at 33k when the SX msrp maxes out at about 31k. Real world prices are 27k.

  • jctsv

    Fastest car hands down 2014 cts v sedan

  • Moh’m Yahya

    I hope to do this teat again , and bring 2015 new cars .
    ( Sonata , Passat , Camry , Fusion , Legacy , Accord , Mazda 6 , Optima , Altima )

« Back

AutoGuide.com’s Monthly Overlay Newsletter Signup – By subscribing to our email newsletter, Entrants are eligible to win one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card (value of $100.00 USD). One (1) winner will be chosen every month at random and contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. *Amazon.com is not a sponsor of this promotion. Except as required by law, Amazon.com Gift Cards ("GCs") cannot be transferred for value or redeemed for cash. GCs may be used only for purchases of eligible goods at Amazon.com or certain of its affiliated websites. For complete terms and conditions, see www.amazon.com/gc-legal. GCs are issued by ACI Gift Cards, Inc., a Washington corporation. All Amazon ®, ™ & © are IP of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. No expiration date or service fees.


2. PRIZE: One (1) Winner will be randomly selected every month to each receive: one (1) $100.00 Amazon.com Gift Card (the “Prize Supplier”). Total approximate retail value of all prizes is approximately $100.00 USD. Prizes are not transferable and no cash or prize substitution is allowed. Prize package is awarded "as is" with no warranty or guarantee, either express or implied.

3. ELIGIBILITY: From the time of entry through the final date of prize fulfillment, each contest entrant and selected entrant must be a permanent lawful citizen and resident residing in the 50 United States or the District of Columbia or in Canada, and be twenty one (21) years of age or older. VOID IN PUERTO RICO, THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, IN ALL FOREIGN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ALL OTHER U.S. TERRITORIES OR CANADA AND POSSESSIONS AND WHERE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. Employees, officers, directors, agents and representatives, of the Sponsor and the Prize Supplier and each of their respective parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, promotion partners and any entity involved in the development, production, implementation, administration or fulfillment of this Sweepstakes, and the immediate family members (e.g., spouse, mother, father, sister, brother, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, grandparent, in-law, daughter and son, regardless of where they live) and persons living in the same household (whether or not related) of such individuals are not eligible to participate or win. Only one selected entrant per household. All decisions of the Sponsor with respect to this sweepstakes are final. The Sponsor shall have the right at any time to require proof of identity and failure to provide such proof may result in disqualification from the Sweepstakes.

4. ENTER BY INTERNET: You may enter this sweepstakes via the Internet by logging onto AutoGuide.com and subscribing to our email newsletter via the pop-up overlay.

5. SELECTION OF WINNER: One (1) Entrant will be selected by random selection who have subscribed to our email newsletter. The winner may be announced publicly on AutoGuide.com and will be contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. The winner will be required to provide a mailing address (that is not a P.O. box) to receive the prize which will be shipped free of charge.

6. ODDS OF WINNING: Odds of winning a prize are determined by the total number of eligible entries received.

7. RESTRICTIONS: The prize package consists of one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card with an approximate value of $100.00 USD. If prize cannot be awarded due to circumstances beyond the control of the Sponsor or Prize Supplier, no substitute prize will be awarded due to the unique nature of the prize. Sponsor and Prize Supplier shall not be liable to the winner or any person claiming through winner for failure to supply the prize or any part thereof, by reason of any acts of God, any action(s), regulation(s), order(s) or request(s) by any governmental or quasi-governmental entity (whether or not the action(s), regulations(s), order(s) or request(s) prove(s) to be invalid), equipment failure, utility failure, internet failure, terrorist acts, threatened terrorist acts, air raid, blackout, act of public enemy, earthquake, war (declared or undeclared), fire, flood, epidemic, explosion, unusually severe weather, hurricane, embargo, labor dispute or strike (whether legal or illegal) labor or material shortage, transportation interruption of any kind, work slow-down, civil disturbance, insurrection, riot, or any other cause beyond Sponsor's or Prize Supplier's control (collectively, "Force Majeure Event"). Sponsor shall not be responsible for any cancellations, delays, diversions or substitutions or any act or omissions whatsoever by the performers/events, other transportation companies or any other persons providing any of these services and accommodations to passengers including any results thereof such as changes in services or accommodations necessitated by same.

8. CONDITIONS: By entering the Sweepstakes, entrants agree to be bound by the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions and that Sponsor has the irrevocable right to use in perpetuity entrants' names, user names, likenesses, photographs, voices, home mailing address, biographical and prize information, and entry materials, without notice to entrants and without compensation or obligation, in any and all media now or hereafter known throughout the world, in any manner whatsoever, to advertise and promote Sponsor, its products and services, the Sweepstakes, and for any other purpose except where prohibited by law. Entrant waives the right to assert as a cost of winning a prize any and all costs of verification and redemption or travel to redeem said prize and any liability which might arise from redeeming or seeking to redeem said prize. Sponsor is not responsible for fraudulent calls or emails made to entrants not by the Sponsor. If the Sweepstakes is not capable of running as planned by reason of damage by computer viruses, worms or bugs, tampering, unauthorized intervention, fraud, technical limitations or failures, any Force Majeure Event or any other cause which, in the sole opinion of Sponsor, could corrupt, compromise, undermine or otherwise affect the administration, security, fairness, integrity, viability or proper conduct of the Sweepstakes, Sponsor reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend all or any part of the Sweepstakes, and to select a winner from among all eligible entries received by Sponsor up until the time of such cancellation, termination, modification or suspension, as applicable. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual that (i) tampers or attempts to tamper with the entry process or the operations of this Sweepstakes in any manner, (ii) violates the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions or (iii) acts in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner, or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other person. CAUTION: ANY ATTEMPT BY AN ENTRANT OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THIS SWEEPSTAKES IS A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS. SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND/OR DAMAGES FROM ANY SUCH PERSON TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. Any expenses and receipt and use of the prize and federal, state and local taxes and fees applicable in connection with the prize awarded are the sole responsibility of the winner. An IRS Form 1099 will be issued in the name of the winner for the actual value of the prize received. This Sweepstakes is subject to all federal, state and local laws of the United States. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. Sponsor, Prize Supplier, and their respective officers, directors, parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries and advertising and promotion agencies, employees, representatives and agents are not responsible for and shall not be liable for (i) any injuries, losses or damages of any kind caused by a prize resulting from acceptance, possession or usage of the prize, or (ii) printing, distribution or production errors. Sponsor or its affiliates may rescind any promotion found to contain such errors without liability at its or their sole discretion.

9. SPONSOR: The Sponsor of this contest is VerticalScope Inc. (the owner and operator of AutoGuide.com), 111 Peter Street, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1.

Subscribe to our email newsletter and automatically be entered to win.
*Restrictions apply. See offer for details

Get Breaking Automotive News, Reviews and Video in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked