Top 10 Least Reliable New Cars: The 2013 Edition

Top 10 Least Reliable New Cars: The 2013 Edition

10. Ford Taurus (3.5L EcoBoost)

If you’re shopping for a new car and reliability is at the top of your list of priorities, you might want to avoid the following vehicles found on this top 10 list.

Based on Consumer Reports‘ reliability studies and surveys, these are the top 10 least reliable new cars on the market right now with the rankings based on survey results covering 17 potential trouble spots. 

Kicking off the list is the Ford Taurus 3.5-liter EcoBoost model. The American automaker’s sedan is good for 365 hp and 350 lb-ft of torque from the 3.5-liter turbocharged EcoBoost V6. That specific model (SHO) starts at $40,695 while getting 17 mpg in the city and 25 mpg on the highway. The SHO model comes with a six-speed automatic transmission with paddle activation with 19-inch wheels as standard.

You can read AutoGuide‘s review on the Ford Taurus here.

  • davinpeterson

    Surprised to see so many Ford’s on the list. Ford always brags about how their cars are better than Toyota. However, they are not as reliable as Toyota. I thought Chrysler was the leased reliable of the Big 3

  • Jason

    yeah, toyota and mitsubishi are far most reliable than ford. it’s just that toyota and mitsubishi are underrated

  • powerwagonmike

    davin, what do you mean when you say “leased reliable” are you attempting to say something about lease companies? Or has your education let you down, this doesn’t say much for your opinion. Did you mean to say least reliable? Or just exactly what were you attempting to ramble on about.

  • davinpeterson

    Yes, I meant least, not lease. Just a typo.

  • survivor2011

    Perhaps you should take your Valium and calm down

  • Soyntgo4it

    Why would anyone even believe anything Consumer Reports say, you do realize they gave the Camry poor ratings then in another article praised it. I think that company needs to stop doing car reports and leave it to the real reviewers.

  • Jay80

    Preach it! You want reliable auto reviews, go to Edmunds. ‘Nuff said

  • Douggseven

    Consumer Reports relies on magazine revenue to make money – not as space. They aren’t biased to any manufacture. This is what they claim. But they tend to review Japanese cars higher than they deserve. While I’ve never purchased Japanese myself – I have heard plenty a horror story about their nameplates.

  • Don Falloon

    I’m curious why these cars are deemed least reliable. Really. The captions read like an advertisement with no info as to why these cars are so unreliable. Clicking on reviews gets you just that; reviews. Again, no reliability data. All I can assume is that the names were tossed into a hat and drawn out as a Halloween prank.

  • Kinetis

    I smell an article to promote page visits with the content having very little in relation to the title. Shame on Autoguide.

  • Honest Abe

    I think I smell a grumpy Ford fanboy….

  • Don Falloon

    Well, after 40 years of owning and driving Fords, except for a certain 2003 Windstar that I wouldn’t wish on my ex-wife — okay, maybe her — I think I’m qualified to speak from experience as to reliability of the species. Regardless of my favorites, that doesn’t change the fact that Autoguide’s *article* doesn’t quite qualify as investigative journalism. I came here looking for answers, not necessarily to launch a defense of the Blue Oval.

    And I am not grumpy. Nor do I think I smell, but I’ll take a shower as a precaution.

  • T_R

    Rubbish story and journalism. Next time you decide to add a car on a ‘least reliable’ list how about actually telling people the reasons why. This story is just a cheap shot fairy-tail without any real content.

  • The Lone Wulf

    Well said! I was thinking the EXACT SAME THING!

  • chavitz

    Those crappy cars companies are the ones who make most of advertisment buzz here, including their cheerleaders

  • Jason

    china cars are the most reliable

  • Honest Abe

    All I can say is… LOL.

  • Douggseven

    Wow, just…wow.

    I think he’s trying to say Japan – but eve that’s not the case anymore. The Pathfinder is from a Japanese manufacturer and it’s on the list. And don’t forget – Nissans are just Datsuns with a new name. Datsun was considered the worst cars on the market – so much so that they had to change their name. Not much has changed. Nissans still rust out early due to cheap and flimsy steel, reliability is poor across the board, and are ugly as hell.

  • Kyle Sapp

    agreed! they are junk

  • Simon J

    I remember Ford filled up this list last year too.

  • Tex

    Anybody see a recurring theme here???

  • Alaskan Buyer

    Consumer Reports has NEVER liked Ford in any way shape or form. It seems like they have a hidden agenda against Ford in particular.

  • Carguy

    Find a review that praises MYTouch or their dual clutch transmission. It’s not Consumer Reports that say the cars are unreliable, it’s the owners of the cars saying it. I subscribe to three car mags and a regular reader of several blogs, they all say the same thing about the aforementioned Ford problems.

  • Pat

    The problem, though, is that only a tiny sampling of owners report a specific problem, and CR assumes a certain percentage of every model sold will therefore have the same issues. This in turn sways John Q Public into thinking a certain make and model of car is a lot worse than it actually is. It goes the other way, too. When someone sees great reliability scores, he or she will think that a certain car is a lot better than it actually is. The truth is that practically all cars built today are much more reliable than they were 20 years ago, and the differences between the highest-rated and the lowest-rated cars for dependability is insignificant.

  • solstar

    looks that they don’t like V.W. either !

  • Pat

    When it comes to VW, Consumer Reports doesn’t know their arse from a hole in the ground. The original air-cooled Beetle was one of the most dependable cars for its day, and the water-cooled Beetles that have been around since 1998 are yet light-years ahead .

  • GhengisT

    Boo! Where are the facts, statistics, etc? Irony is I own a Genesis Coupe, with a 2.0T. That same exact engine powers the Hyundai Sonata which won JD Power & Associates “Most reliable sedan” award. The transmission in my coupe takes a bit of finess and the Sonata is FWD, so the only difference between the two. Ah this is a laughable article, and it just further implies that is not trustworthy source for information. Smells like the desperation of a male teen virgin who’s only hobby is Magic the Gathering.

  • survivor2011

    Its a reincarnated Karman Ghia…but uglier.

  • survivor2011

    Oh and I post as a current Bug owner. This is is the most expensive car I have ever owned….combining ALL my previous cars! Example: 8,000.00 transmission. VW knows about this issue and it is well documented….ZERO concern or remediation…pffft!

  • Pat

    I have 2 New Beetles, a 2000 and a 2010, 96k and 51K respectively.. No problems at all.

  • Paul

    What a dumb article. Least reliable and then when you hit the link to read the review to see what the issues are they sing the praises of the car. Talking about the Hyundai Genesis Coupe. Another sample of misleading article title just to get you to read it

  • David

    How can you put a car as 9th most unreliable and not mention anything about what is unreliable in it?!

  • Douggseven

    Click the review.

  • RickRayFSM

    Aren’t VW ‘s known as Hitler’s revenge?

  • RickRayFSM

    Isn’t FORD an acronym for “F…ing Old Rusty Dodge?”

  • Lars

    Found On Road Dead

  • BarkingSpider

    Fixed Or Repaired Daily

  • Happy

    Four old rusty doors

  • Happy

    F’ed on raw deal

  • Brendan Cullis

    F’ed On Race Day

  • John Adelaide

    Found on rubbish dump or Fool on road danger!?

  • asdf

    Vw’s were good when they were make in Germany. Got 450k outta a jetta. only thing went wrong was the tranny everything else was still good.

  • Douggseven

    Not really. VWs are serial offenders when it comes to poor reliability. Looks like your Jetta got lucky.

  • Vaughn Wilcox

    Seriously, how can you have an article about the 10 least reliable cars without saying what’s wrong with them?

    All you’re doing is regurgitating specs.


  • Douggseven

    Click the reviews.

  • Rip Stickowitz

    In no way did any of this article point out why these cars are unreliable.You raised trolling to new standards of bs.

  • Brendan Cullis

    Total bias rambling. No explanation as to why these cars are bad.

  • Douggseven

    Click the reviews to read what the issues are.

  • Paul Quinn

    I have an XTS with 20k on it, never had a problem and what a nice car !

  • Frank

    You shouldn’t it has 20k miles on it….

  • Brendan Cullis

    What are these so called 17 trouble spots? Define please? BTW I have a 2013 Genesis Coupe 2.0T. I love it.

  • Douggseven

    Click the review.

  • Matt

    What a pointless article. Maybe summarize what makes the vehicle unreliable? Don’t tell me to click the review. An article about unreliable cars should include what makes them unreliable without having to go to another article.

  • Iggi

    I drive a 2010 Genesis Coupe 3.8 GT Manual Transmission with 50K miles. I change the oil 2x a year with semi-synthetic. I’ve replaced the tires at around 36K miles, other than that, there are no issues. What makes my car unreliable?

  • Colby

    Ok. There is a reoccurring theme of Fords. I was surprised not to see any Chevys considering all the bad stuff that is happening to my friends’ new Chevys. I am in no matter a Ford fanboy or a Chevy hater but I just can’t see what makes them unreliable. I have found Fords to be the most reliable.

  • Dollface

    Of the 6 fords either myself my family or in one case a friend of mine owned they all turned out to be crap and 4 of them had the exact same transmission issues. I think that is a factor I dont care either way I am not a car person but ^ bad cars in a decade in the same circle is a little telling I will never buy another ford.

  • Colby

    I guess it is just luck and where they are made (what factory). Everybody has different experiences of different brands. For me, I am never going to buy a Chevy. To you, you are never going to buy a ford.

« Back
SWEEPSTAKES – OFFICIAL RULES, TERMS AND CONDITIONS’s Monthly Overlay Newsletter Signup – By subscribing to our email newsletter, Entrants are eligible to win one (1) Gift Card (value of $100.00 USD). One (1) winner will be chosen every month at random and contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. * is not a sponsor of this promotion. Except as required by law, Gift Cards ("GCs") cannot be transferred for value or redeemed for cash. GCs may be used only for purchases of eligible goods at or certain of its affiliated websites. For complete terms and conditions, see GCs are issued by ACI Gift Cards, Inc., a Washington corporation. All Amazon ®, ™ & © are IP of, Inc. or its affiliates. No expiration date or service fees.


2. PRIZE: One (1) Winner will be randomly selected every month to each receive: one (1) $100.00 Gift Card (the “Prize Supplier”). Total approximate retail value of all prizes is approximately $100.00 USD. Prizes are not transferable and no cash or prize substitution is allowed. Prize package is awarded "as is" with no warranty or guarantee, either express or implied.

3. ELIGIBILITY: From the time of entry through the final date of prize fulfillment, each contest entrant and selected entrant must be a permanent lawful citizen and resident residing in the 50 United States or the District of Columbia or in Canada, and be twenty one (21) years of age or older. VOID IN PUERTO RICO, THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, IN ALL FOREIGN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ALL OTHER U.S. TERRITORIES OR CANADA AND POSSESSIONS AND WHERE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. Employees, officers, directors, agents and representatives, of the Sponsor and the Prize Supplier and each of their respective parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, promotion partners and any entity involved in the development, production, implementation, administration or fulfillment of this Sweepstakes, and the immediate family members (e.g., spouse, mother, father, sister, brother, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, grandparent, in-law, daughter and son, regardless of where they live) and persons living in the same household (whether or not related) of such individuals are not eligible to participate or win. Only one selected entrant per household. All decisions of the Sponsor with respect to this sweepstakes are final. The Sponsor shall have the right at any time to require proof of identity and failure to provide such proof may result in disqualification from the Sweepstakes.

4. ENTER BY INTERNET: You may enter this sweepstakes via the Internet by logging onto and subscribing to our email newsletter via the pop-up overlay.

5. SELECTION OF WINNER: One (1) Entrant will be selected by random selection who have subscribed to our email newsletter. The winner may be announced publicly on and will be contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. The winner will be required to provide a mailing address (that is not a P.O. box) to receive the prize which will be shipped free of charge.

6. ODDS OF WINNING: Odds of winning a prize are determined by the total number of eligible entries received.

7. RESTRICTIONS: The prize package consists of one (1) Gift Card with an approximate value of $100.00 USD. If prize cannot be awarded due to circumstances beyond the control of the Sponsor or Prize Supplier, no substitute prize will be awarded due to the unique nature of the prize. Sponsor and Prize Supplier shall not be liable to the winner or any person claiming through winner for failure to supply the prize or any part thereof, by reason of any acts of God, any action(s), regulation(s), order(s) or request(s) by any governmental or quasi-governmental entity (whether or not the action(s), regulations(s), order(s) or request(s) prove(s) to be invalid), equipment failure, utility failure, internet failure, terrorist acts, threatened terrorist acts, air raid, blackout, act of public enemy, earthquake, war (declared or undeclared), fire, flood, epidemic, explosion, unusually severe weather, hurricane, embargo, labor dispute or strike (whether legal or illegal) labor or material shortage, transportation interruption of any kind, work slow-down, civil disturbance, insurrection, riot, or any other cause beyond Sponsor's or Prize Supplier's control (collectively, "Force Majeure Event"). Sponsor shall not be responsible for any cancellations, delays, diversions or substitutions or any act or omissions whatsoever by the performers/events, other transportation companies or any other persons providing any of these services and accommodations to passengers including any results thereof such as changes in services or accommodations necessitated by same.

8. CONDITIONS: By entering the Sweepstakes, entrants agree to be bound by the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions and that Sponsor has the irrevocable right to use in perpetuity entrants' names, user names, likenesses, photographs, voices, home mailing address, biographical and prize information, and entry materials, without notice to entrants and without compensation or obligation, in any and all media now or hereafter known throughout the world, in any manner whatsoever, to advertise and promote Sponsor, its products and services, the Sweepstakes, and for any other purpose except where prohibited by law. Entrant waives the right to assert as a cost of winning a prize any and all costs of verification and redemption or travel to redeem said prize and any liability which might arise from redeeming or seeking to redeem said prize. Sponsor is not responsible for fraudulent calls or emails made to entrants not by the Sponsor. If the Sweepstakes is not capable of running as planned by reason of damage by computer viruses, worms or bugs, tampering, unauthorized intervention, fraud, technical limitations or failures, any Force Majeure Event or any other cause which, in the sole opinion of Sponsor, could corrupt, compromise, undermine or otherwise affect the administration, security, fairness, integrity, viability or proper conduct of the Sweepstakes, Sponsor reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend all or any part of the Sweepstakes, and to select a winner from among all eligible entries received by Sponsor up until the time of such cancellation, termination, modification or suspension, as applicable. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual that (i) tampers or attempts to tamper with the entry process or the operations of this Sweepstakes in any manner, (ii) violates the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions or (iii) acts in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner, or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other person. CAUTION: ANY ATTEMPT BY AN ENTRANT OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THIS SWEEPSTAKES IS A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS. SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND/OR DAMAGES FROM ANY SUCH PERSON TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. Any expenses and receipt and use of the prize and federal, state and local taxes and fees applicable in connection with the prize awarded are the sole responsibility of the winner. An IRS Form 1099 will be issued in the name of the winner for the actual value of the prize received. This Sweepstakes is subject to all federal, state and local laws of the United States. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. Sponsor, Prize Supplier, and their respective officers, directors, parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries and advertising and promotion agencies, employees, representatives and agents are not responsible for and shall not be liable for (i) any injuries, losses or damages of any kind caused by a prize resulting from acceptance, possession or usage of the prize, or (ii) printing, distribution or production errors. Sponsor or its affiliates may rescind any promotion found to contain such errors without liability at its or their sole discretion.

9. SPONSOR: The Sponsor of this contest is VerticalScope Inc. (the owner and operator of, 111 Peter Street, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1.

Subscribe to our email newsletter and automatically be entered to win.
*Restrictions apply. See offer for details

Get Breaking Automotive News, Reviews and Video in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked