2015 Mustang: Top 10 Facts You Need to Know

2015 Mustang: Top 10 Facts You Need to Know

5. More potent V8

Of course, this is a Mustang and the car wouldn’t be complete without a roaring V8 under the hood. The same 5.0-liter “Coyote” V8 will power this generation, although Ford says it will make more power than before. The brand hasn’t divulged the details, but says it will also be more efficient thanks to a new intake manifold for improved efficiency at low speeds.

For now, all the world knows is that it will make “at least” 420 hp and 390 lb-ft of torque, although the official number will probably climb before any models gallop into dealerships.

  • chavitz

    Mustang is still an old time fashioned, heavy, clumsy, low-tech, and poor reliability junk.

  • Tee

    Well, I know you’re a troll looking for a response so here goes. Yeah, the Mustang is not perfect but it doesn’t cost way near as much as those other cars to which you are inevitably comparing to it. I have owned a few Mustangs over the years and reliability has always been there. Compared to some Dodge and Chevy vehicles I’ve owned during that time, my Mustang was rarely a draw off my bank account. Low tech is not something I’d use as an adjective for the 5.0 engine. Ask any reputable magazine or person who is in the business and they’d laugh at your suggestion. Maybe weight is not its friend but it doesn’t seem to curtail it around the track.

  • Doug

    I can’t imagine any muscle car lasting over 200K stock,—unless you drive like Helen Keller and upkeep the car at half the recommended intervals.

  • g-rant

    I redline mine almost everyday, its called maintenance and not being a lazy, cheap ass. Putting good quality replacement parts and doing fluid changes when recommended, if your cars breaking down 95% of the time the owner is to blame.

  • Johnson Kevin

    or it’s a 1986 Hyundai Excel.

  • chavitz

    Those trolls usually get low scores in IQ test , but high scores in lie test

  • Johnson Kevin

    A friend put over 300K on his 1989 Mustang before changing the motor, and not because it failed. It was just tired. I have over 200K on my stock 1987 Mustang and it has the same motor and transmission as the day it left the factory. Fires up every time and has never left me stranded. In addition both cars when purchased help to support out economy and your parents…..and you.

  • ProfessorKnowItAll

    I applaud your enthusiasm. I also hope you realize that buying a product from Ford, GM and Chrysler has about as much effect on the economy as any other vehicle does in actual economic stimulation. Fact is, Japanese and German companies build cars and trucks here, too. In fact, the most “american” vehicle – if you decide by content – has often been one with a Japanese badge. #MindBlown

  • Johnson Kevin

    That’s part of the problem in my opinion. The fact of the matter is what truly matters is where the profits go. Profits that go to the home office are what allow a company to continue research, development, production and employing humans. When a ‘foreign’ car is purchased, those funds leave these shores and go to the home country from where the automobile was born. We can print more money, but that leads to inflation.
    By the way, the Japanese, Germans and Koreans could not care less about American workers. They build cars here because it makes financial sense and they don’t want a repeat of what happened in the early 90’s. Remember Americans were taking baseball bats to foreign cars in parking lots. That was a PR nightmare for the Japanese. Well guess what, they found a solution. Build the cars here plus save on import taxes then tell the Americans how they build them in Tennessee. That should keep us nice and quiet during the next economic downturn. ProfessorKnowItAll, you are a sheep. Wake up. By the way, we’re friends by default because we’re fellow Americans; we have more in common that we don’t.

  • Doug

    If you would rather support communism, buy a government owned car like a 2009 or later Camaro/Challenger. If your American, Ford is your only choice. Just saying.

  • Jeffrey Lee Virgin

    Nobody cares about your car except you. Mustang had 30 plus years of ugly , the 70’s right up to 2004. We agree on one thing, the 2015 is back to ugly. I own a Mustang, love the new Camaro too. It is possible to like both cars.

  • Jeffrey Lee Virgin

    Camaro and Challenger are built in Canada . Canada has health care, and pays the people who build them higher wages than the U.S. Sounds like communism to me.

  • Jeffrey Lee Virgin

    So is your Momma.

  • yo

    hahahah. that was awesome

  • Scritti Politti

    What about weight? Weight reduction was supposed to be one of the major goals for the new car. The Mustang has become a fat-ass, which NEEDS 400 HP just to haul its bulk down the street.

    And lowering the car was a bad idea, as our infrastructure crumbles and roads get worse. That front air dam won’t last a day on Santa Monica’s disgraceful streets.

  • Doug

    A modern car on 1940’s streets would be a blast. No pot holes. Yes, the USA used to be better. They call it progress.

  • Doug

    I am not a fan of the body look and wrap around head lights, so I am glad I put a blower on my S197 2006 V6 (roots style from explorer express with intercooler), some chassis upgrades and a Cervini’s hood and spoiler with painted stripes (Joe’s custom restoration, Freesoil MI.). Now, for the power, it is on par with a good muscle car of the early 70’s (300hp at the wheels), and does not get beat by a prius, which was unacceptable. With the chassis upgrades, it corners like a cockroach being chassed by a broom. I already want more power though, but it’s a bad little V6, with a more retro body style. I give a big “thumbs down” out my window to any Government owned Camaro I see, but the dupes don’t know why. It is because government is not suppose to take over our capitalism, because it is called communism when that happens. Happy health care.

  • Jeffrey Lee Virgin

    Health Care is a basic human right, I am sorry for your ignorance.

  • tommorofski

    Jeffrey, a little bad news for you. the world and/or the U.S. taxpayers (you know, the workers) DO NOT owe you anything, including health care. YOU owe YOU a little personal pride to work and provide for you and yours.

  • Norm Peterson

    Whether it is or isn’t is moot. What matters is if it’s going to be done it at all, it has to be done thoughtfully and workably. Not on the arbitrary and way too compressed of a schedule that results from trying to meet campaign promises.
    40-odd years ago the promise to place a man on the moon only had to involve those willing to take the risk. Universally mandated stuff of any sort does not fall into the same category.
    FWIW, there is more than enough “Mustang-ness” about this new one to avoid confusion.

  • Scott

    No it’s not.

  • Mitch

    Not sure what you’re talking about, Ford has most definitely accepted money from our government… look it up. No need to work your skewed politics into a car enthusiast forum.

  • 83ragtop50

    Butt ugly and so is the frontend. I’ll not be buying one of these.

  • Timmay

    I just looked at the Ford site and they’re taking $1,000 off the “old” mustang now. A grand is a grand, but I bet you could browbeat them down by quite a bit once the new one comes out. #GLHF!

  • yo

    Dear Ford,
    Please get to work on a hot rod Lincoln version of this immediately. Do not wait till 2017. It needs to happen by 2015!!
    Thanks, car guys of the world

  • Joe Louis

    Agreed!! Except it won’t ever happen. If you’ll see anything “hot” out of Lincoln, it’ll be an engine fire related recall… Or so it seems. Wonder if the 2.3L can hack it at “hard” driving…

  • gcaseley

    If I wanted a car that looked like a fusion ,I’d buy a fusion. Epic fail on the new mustang!

  • 2013v6owner

    take the horse off the grill, put in flat rear taillights, and remove the “Mustang and Ford tags”

    Slap some SCION logos on it and hit the road running!

  • CaptK.

    I like the new styling , it just doesn’t look “Mustang”. Finally , no more solid rear axle! ( they are for trucks) How did Ford slip in the 2.3 turbo 4 ? Mazdaspeed lovers will be checking that out.
    Its a great engine after Mazda tweaked it, but remember its about 145 CI. , rated 300 hp and available with automatic . ( First time for a turbo version)
    Drive reports please……..

  • Norm Peterson

    ” Finally , no more solid rear axle! ( they are for trucks)”
    Care to provide some real tech for disparaging the S197’s arrangement like that?
    You might be interested to know that a stockish S197 will run an autocross course nearly as quickly as a similarly stockish non-Z06 C5 Corvette. In fairly lightly modified form (but still A/C’ed and fully daily-drivable) it can outrun that C5. Autocross arguably being the most demanding test of stock and stockish vehicle handling.
    I’m not anti-IRS (unless the IRS is poorly to no better than indifferently engineered). Just anti-“solid axles are crap because they’re not IRS”.

  • Mitch

    Autocross courses are very tight and twisty so saying that one vehicle is “nearly” as fast as another on one isn’t saying much at all when those races are won by mere seconds or even tenths of a second. Comparing modded vehicles with one another is even more irrelevant. Yes, solid rear axles really are for trucks and also straight line performers. By going IRS Ford is breaching into true sports car territory with the Mustang. Be happy about it!

  • Norm Peterson

    I’m afraid you’re missing my point. IRS is not necessarily superior just by the mere fact that the rear wheels are no longer rigidly connected to each other in five degrees of freedom out of six. It still has to be done up well, and not all of them have been.
    That a solid axle Mustang can run as close to the lighter and lower Corvette as it does is as good an indication as any that it is not as inferior as the “a car has gotta have IRS to be any good” crowd keeps insisting that it is. That’s my other beef, it’s like as soon as IRS is mentioned, suddenly any stick axle arrangement is an abysmal failure and only worthy of scorn. An opinion not truly supported by actuality.
    I really do hope the S550’s integral link IRS is better. I expect it to be, and assuming that it is, that will be because of its detail design and engineering, not because of the general rear suspension category it belongs to.

  • Michael Fournier

    personally I could do without the 2.3 turbo or put it in a FocusRS I like my stang with a Growling V8 (they could keep the V6 also) for me the Mustang GT is the base model I do not even consider anything else except a Boss or the Bigger V8 of the Shelby GT. I liked he 05-09 retro style (I own a 09) But I admit it was time for some modern updates. (I have no problem with my 09 having a Live Axle it handles fine the benefit the IRS will give is less unsprung weight and a better ride comfort. (less unsprung weight means you do not need as stiff spring rates and dampers) I will need to see some performance numbers and I personally do not like MacPherson struts I would have preferred adjustable Coilovers on front and back (but I also understand MacPherson struts are cheaper. But I am sure the after market will have a easy fix for that soon.

  • Mark Andrews

    Far Out,! I love all cars but there are always e few in which take on slight subtle changes,such as this Mustang for added safety, comfort and convenience it makes the whole driving experience so much nicer,need to get back to driving being an enjoyable experience ! Love um All

  • Jim Mc Cool

    Great car, but not changed enough to draw the attention it deserves. I would like them to throw away that useless rear seat and shorten the car at least a foot or so. This would save a lot of weight and give the car a new more powerful look.

  • Ed

    Hoping it comes in under 3000 lbs for good weight to hp #’s, otherwise I’ll stick this motor/trans in my 1900 pound 93 fastback and Flyyyy.

  • TG

    I am so glad that Ford finally decided to do away with the Mustangs 4×4 ride height and lower the car over the tires. Now you won’t have to run right out and buy new springs as soon as you get it home from the dealership.

« Back

AutoGuide.com’s Monthly Overlay Newsletter Signup – By subscribing to our email newsletter, Entrants are eligible to win one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card (value of $100.00 USD). One (1) winner will be chosen every month at random and contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. *Amazon.com is not a sponsor of this promotion. Except as required by law, Amazon.com Gift Cards ("GCs") cannot be transferred for value or redeemed for cash. GCs may be used only for purchases of eligible goods at Amazon.com or certain of its affiliated websites. For complete terms and conditions, see www.amazon.com/gc-legal. GCs are issued by ACI Gift Cards, Inc., a Washington corporation. All Amazon ®, ™ & © are IP of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. No expiration date or service fees.


2. PRIZE: One (1) Winner will be randomly selected every month to each receive: one (1) $100.00 Amazon.com Gift Card (the “Prize Supplier”). Total approximate retail value of all prizes is approximately $100.00 USD. Prizes are not transferable and no cash or prize substitution is allowed. Prize package is awarded "as is" with no warranty or guarantee, either express or implied.

3. ELIGIBILITY: From the time of entry through the final date of prize fulfillment, each contest entrant and selected entrant must be a permanent lawful citizen and resident residing in the 50 United States or the District of Columbia or in Canada, and be twenty one (21) years of age or older. VOID IN PUERTO RICO, THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, IN ALL FOREIGN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ALL OTHER U.S. TERRITORIES OR CANADA AND POSSESSIONS AND WHERE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. Employees, officers, directors, agents and representatives, of the Sponsor and the Prize Supplier and each of their respective parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, promotion partners and any entity involved in the development, production, implementation, administration or fulfillment of this Sweepstakes, and the immediate family members (e.g., spouse, mother, father, sister, brother, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, grandparent, in-law, daughter and son, regardless of where they live) and persons living in the same household (whether or not related) of such individuals are not eligible to participate or win. Only one selected entrant per household. All decisions of the Sponsor with respect to this sweepstakes are final. The Sponsor shall have the right at any time to require proof of identity and failure to provide such proof may result in disqualification from the Sweepstakes.

4. ENTER BY INTERNET: You may enter this sweepstakes via the Internet by logging onto AutoGuide.com and subscribing to our email newsletter via the pop-up overlay.

5. SELECTION OF WINNER: One (1) Entrant will be selected by random selection who have subscribed to our email newsletter. The winner may be announced publicly on AutoGuide.com and will be contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. The winner will be required to provide a mailing address (that is not a P.O. box) to receive the prize which will be shipped free of charge.

6. ODDS OF WINNING: Odds of winning a prize are determined by the total number of eligible entries received.

7. RESTRICTIONS: The prize package consists of one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card with an approximate value of $100.00 USD. If prize cannot be awarded due to circumstances beyond the control of the Sponsor or Prize Supplier, no substitute prize will be awarded due to the unique nature of the prize. Sponsor and Prize Supplier shall not be liable to the winner or any person claiming through winner for failure to supply the prize or any part thereof, by reason of any acts of God, any action(s), regulation(s), order(s) or request(s) by any governmental or quasi-governmental entity (whether or not the action(s), regulations(s), order(s) or request(s) prove(s) to be invalid), equipment failure, utility failure, internet failure, terrorist acts, threatened terrorist acts, air raid, blackout, act of public enemy, earthquake, war (declared or undeclared), fire, flood, epidemic, explosion, unusually severe weather, hurricane, embargo, labor dispute or strike (whether legal or illegal) labor or material shortage, transportation interruption of any kind, work slow-down, civil disturbance, insurrection, riot, or any other cause beyond Sponsor's or Prize Supplier's control (collectively, "Force Majeure Event"). Sponsor shall not be responsible for any cancellations, delays, diversions or substitutions or any act or omissions whatsoever by the performers/events, other transportation companies or any other persons providing any of these services and accommodations to passengers including any results thereof such as changes in services or accommodations necessitated by same.

8. CONDITIONS: By entering the Sweepstakes, entrants agree to be bound by the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions and that Sponsor has the irrevocable right to use in perpetuity entrants' names, user names, likenesses, photographs, voices, home mailing address, biographical and prize information, and entry materials, without notice to entrants and without compensation or obligation, in any and all media now or hereafter known throughout the world, in any manner whatsoever, to advertise and promote Sponsor, its products and services, the Sweepstakes, and for any other purpose except where prohibited by law. Entrant waives the right to assert as a cost of winning a prize any and all costs of verification and redemption or travel to redeem said prize and any liability which might arise from redeeming or seeking to redeem said prize. Sponsor is not responsible for fraudulent calls or emails made to entrants not by the Sponsor. If the Sweepstakes is not capable of running as planned by reason of damage by computer viruses, worms or bugs, tampering, unauthorized intervention, fraud, technical limitations or failures, any Force Majeure Event or any other cause which, in the sole opinion of Sponsor, could corrupt, compromise, undermine or otherwise affect the administration, security, fairness, integrity, viability or proper conduct of the Sweepstakes, Sponsor reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend all or any part of the Sweepstakes, and to select a winner from among all eligible entries received by Sponsor up until the time of such cancellation, termination, modification or suspension, as applicable. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual that (i) tampers or attempts to tamper with the entry process or the operations of this Sweepstakes in any manner, (ii) violates the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions or (iii) acts in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner, or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other person. CAUTION: ANY ATTEMPT BY AN ENTRANT OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THIS SWEEPSTAKES IS A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS. SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND/OR DAMAGES FROM ANY SUCH PERSON TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. Any expenses and receipt and use of the prize and federal, state and local taxes and fees applicable in connection with the prize awarded are the sole responsibility of the winner. An IRS Form 1099 will be issued in the name of the winner for the actual value of the prize received. This Sweepstakes is subject to all federal, state and local laws of the United States. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. Sponsor, Prize Supplier, and their respective officers, directors, parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries and advertising and promotion agencies, employees, representatives and agents are not responsible for and shall not be liable for (i) any injuries, losses or damages of any kind caused by a prize resulting from acceptance, possession or usage of the prize, or (ii) printing, distribution or production errors. Sponsor or its affiliates may rescind any promotion found to contain such errors without liability at its or their sole discretion.

9. SPONSOR: The Sponsor of this contest is VerticalScope Inc. (the owner and operator of AutoGuide.com), 111 Peter Street, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1.

Subscribe to our email newsletter and automatically be entered to win.
*Restrictions apply. See offer for details

Get Breaking Automotive News, Reviews and Video in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked