2014 Three-Row Crossover Comparison Test

2014 Three-Row Crossover Comparison Test

6th Place - Honda Pilot Touring 4WD

The fact that this crossover didn’t come dead last speaks volumes about how well it was designed from the start because it’s been pretty much been the same old crossover since people still believed balloon boy was real. As a senior citizen in the automotive world, it should come as no surprise that everything inside the Honda Pilot felt dated from the gauge cluster to the center stack to the wiper blades. Items like satellite radio, navigation and heated seats were included on our test vehicle, but the layout and switch gear all seem down market compared to the more modern offerings in this comparison. Even the Traverse’s interior looked more modern than the Pilot’s.


At an as tested price of $42,250, The Pilot costs more than the Santa Fe, Sorento and Highlander. Hurting the Pilot further is the fact the two Korean offerings come equipped with cooled front seats, a heated steering wheel and panoramic sunroofs at that price.

Fundamentals Flawless

As should be expected from a Honda product, most of the fundamentals have been nailed in the Pilot. The cabin layout is hands-down the most practical and the boxy shape that allows for both great sight-lines and a lot of interior space. Aside from offering the second most total cargo room at 87 cubic feet, the Pilot was able to allow seven seats to still be operable during our luggage testing – a number only beat by the Traverse that allowed eight.

The boxy shape does have some drawbacks however as it created excessive amounts of wind noise on the highway. The suspension feels squishy in normal driving, yet is harsh over rough roads. The steering also drew some ire as it was overly soft and featured plenty of on-center play that lead to constant corrections during highway driving.

SEE ALSO: 2013 Honda Pilot Review – Video

Under hood is Honda’s 3.5-liter V6 with 250 hp and 253 lb-ft paired to a five-speed automatic. Despite having the ancient automatic, the Pilot is officially rated at 17 MPG in the city and 24 MPG on the highway. During our testing, it finished mid-pack with an observed fuel economy average of 20 MPG.

The current Pilot is in desperate need of a redesign and rumor has it one is not far off. However, if you must own a mid-size Honda crossover, the Pilot still is somewhat competitive.

Fast Facts: 2014-Honda-Pilot-05.jpg

  1. PRICE AS TESTED: $42,250
  2. ENGINE: 3.5-liter V6, 250 hp, 253 lb-ft
  3. TRANSMISSION: 5-speed automatic
  5. CARGO CAPACITY (behind second row): 47.7 cu. Ft.



  • Boxy shape
  • Spacious interior
  • Good second row seating
  • Good third row seating



  • Harsh ride
  • Poor NHV
  • Out of date
  • Sloppy drive


5th Place – Kia Sorento SX AWD

Kia Sorento

The Kia Sorento is another vehicle that had our staff divided. Some found it to be the most responsive vehicle in this test in terms of engine and handling response, while others found it to be a big bowl of “meh”. With only 290 hp and 252 lb-ft of torque from a 3.3-liter V6, the Sorento rivaling the 360 hp Hemi powered Durango for quickest in the test may sound far fetched. However, the 3,894 lbs. Sorento has a whopping 1,500 pound weight advantage over the monstrous Dodge.

This lightness also adds up to impressive fuel economy. Rated officially at 18 MPG in the city and 24 MPG on the highway, we managed an average of 22 MPG during our testing period which put the Kia second only to the Pathfinder Hybrid. The Sorento also placed second when came to price, listing just higher than the lowest-in-test Highlander at $38,895. And unlike the Toyota, the Sorento came loaded up with features like heated and cooled front seats, heated rear seats, a heated steering wheel and a panoramic sunroof.

The Unrefined Small Guy 2014-Kia-Sorento-04.jpg

Efficient, affordable and responsive, the rest of the Sorento came off less impressive, relegating it to a mid-pack finish. The sporty pretensions of this crossover hurt it as the ride quality was deemed to be worst in test. Bumps in the road sent vibrations throughout the chassis and the vehicle never felt all that planted.

The Sorento was the smallest vehicle in the test and offers virtually no cargo space, although we were surprised to find the third row seats were not the worst in the test and actually somewhat accommodating.

SEE ALSO: 2014 Kia Sorento Review

We like the Sorento’s center stack better than the one found in the Hyundai and we also appreciated the easy, clean layout of the dashboard. However, the rest of the interior feels a bit cheap and the navigation system is out of date.

The smaller Sorento represents a good value with a killer warranty and the allusion that is a sporty alternative to regular three-row crossovers. If space and refinement are not high on your shopping list, then there’s an argument to be made for taking the Sorento for a test drive.

Fast Facts: 2014-Kia-Sorento-03.jpg

  1. PRICE AS TESTED: $38,895
  2. ENGINE: 3.3-liter V6, 290 hp, 252 lb-ft
  3. TRANSMISSION: 6-speed automatic
  5. CARGO CAPACITY (behind second row): 36.9 cu. Ft.



  • Affordable
  • Fuel efficient
  • Responsive
  • Technology laden



  • Small inside
  • Rough ride
  • Fit and finish


  • Rickers

    This is total bullshit. No Hyundai deserves to win anything.

  • Chris

    Then you haven’t been paying attention to Hyundai in the last few years. They’ve worked extremely hard to improve their offerings and it’s showing.

  • mike

    Hyundais and Kias should never be left out of the trailer parks in which their owners live…

  • Sargegxp

    Best reply award.

  • bd

    Apart from the not being true thing.

  • Santiago Vo

    Two of my neighbors replaced their new Hyundais within first two years of ownership and swore not to buy them again, ever.

  • bd

    Except, Toyotas tend to have a lower ATP across the board.
    The Camry, for instance, has a lower ATP than the Chrysler 200 whereas the Kia Optima has one of the highest ATPs in the segment.
    So sorry, it’s Toyotas that are filling the trailer parks (as well as rental fleet lots).

  • Sargegxp

    Maybe you need to see a doc Korean vehicles may look good from the specs but fail in every category

  • MeetTerry

    How do they fail in every category?
    But alright. You can believe whatever you want. but CarMD has already rated Hyundai to be the most reliable manufacturer.

  • Sargegxp

    Right on!!

  • bd

    Hardly the 1st time a Hyundai (much less the Santa Fe) has won a comparison test.

  • Honest Abe

    I’m seriously shocked. Not by the winner.. but by the Dodge Durango. I didn’t even know they still made it… and now I find out it’s actually good. Shocking.

  • Juan

    Where’s the Mazda CX-9? I demand a re-do.

  • ImNotTheWalrus

    I agree might be the best drivers SUV out there

  • Todd

    I love weighted tests like this. Had Dodge chosen a cheaper durango with a V6 and less fancy features, it wouldn’t have been nearly as high on the list. Lets take a comparison of these same vehicles after 3 or 4 years of ownership (half the “lifetime” of todays cars). The Koreans will rattle like they are falling apart, the Japanese will still be trucking, and the Americans will have all of their fancy features failing.

  • http://batman-news.com kevin monette

    Todd, today’s american vehicles are much better than they were just 10 years ago. I replaced my loaded 2005 Chevy Silverado 2500 HD CC Diesel last year with a new version of the same pickup, the 2005 having over 120,000 miles on it. I had no issues with any of the “fancy features”, everything in and on it still worked as new. That was easily the best vehicle I have ever owned, even less maintenance than our BMW 328 Xi.

  • Todd

    I have a “newer” GM, an 05 Avalanche Z71. It had a cushy life with little to no towing, hauling or 4WD usage. I put a transmission in it @105K…same 3-4 clutch problems that the 4L60E has had since it was the 700-R4 in my 85 Camaro. The sunroof doesn’t work and the leather seats were replaced because of cracking. The drivers side window switch has a life of its own and frequently turns on the seat heaters at will (adj pedals and seat heaters are run through the window switch). The quality is better, but still doesn’t match the japanese. Of course, not nearly as bad as my 2013 Jetta TDI where the sunroof has been fixed at the dealer twice already…

  • http://batman-news.com kevin monette

    That’s rather interesting as my ’05 Silverado would have utilized many of the same parts as your Avalanche as far as the seats and window switches go and I had just the opposite experience with mine. No tranny issues whatsoever with regular towing of both a large four season travel trailer and also a 20′ enclosed snowmobile trailer however comparing the Allison tranny to the 4L60E is not at all apples to apples.

  • Sargegxp

    Avalanche still the best

  • Rickers

    Too bad the Chevy Traverse is 10 years old then.. lol.

  • bd

    Must not have much experience with the newer Japanese models.

  • Richard

    Actually, I owned a Hyundai Santa Fe Sport for almost a year. But the
    larger “regular” Santa Fe comes with the V6. The problem with the Santa
    Fe Sport is the underpowered engine as no V6 is offered in the five seat
    version. Unless I am badly mistaken, the same Kia version is offered with a
    V6 which makes an enormous difference. I’ve seen the 2014 Kia, and
    personally, I prefer it over the Hyundai. It is noteworthy that Kia
    assembled my Santa Fe. I don’t believe there are that many differences
    really. Check their dimensions, etc., on an Edmund’s comparison page
    and it is fairly obvious they are essentially the same vehicle.

  • MeetTerry

    Did you own the 2.4L? I drive the 2.0 Turbo model, and the 274 rated horsepower is extremely peppy.

  • mike

    mom jeans ftw

  • mike

    We just bought our second Flex. Too bad you chose the Explorer…or is that all Ford would provide?

    Didn’t read the article since it didn’t include the D471. Not sure why I even received an email telling me about this since I never signed up for your site.

    EcoBoost V-6!

  • J Mac

    But the Flex is so… well… UGLY!

  • Shiratori1

    Calling BS on this comparison. During motortrend’s 2014 SUVOTY testing, they indicated that the Santa Fe was a complete rattlebox and had a back end that “sounded like it was made out of styrofoam”. Hyundai/Kia in my book are two companies that try to hook (sucker) customers into buying their vehicles by loading them with a bunch of standard features with questionable quality and constantly mentioning their 100,000 mile warranty, all of which, is intended to distract those customers away from the fact that the cars are unrefined, aren’t fun to drive, and have questionable build quality.


  • bd

    Give me a break – like the new Highlander hasn’t gotten some middling reviews?

    And the Santa Fe also won Automobile Magazine’s Family Crossover Comparison


    and the Santa Fe Sport came in 2nd (to the Grand Cherokee) in Cars.com/Motorweek’s $38k Midsize SUV Challenge.
    And what’s of questionable quality (not to mention cheap, nasty interiors) and unrefined rides are Toyotas (in a lame attempt to be “sportier” – the Camry, Avalona and ES have all been dinged for their unrefined ride) and of all brands, Toyota (“King of Beige”) is the one known for being the least fun to drive.

  • alexmcyd

    I would like to see a test where minivans are mentioned without the reference to the inane “soccer mom’s hate it” meme. The Honda Odyssey blows these overweight, overly expensive dinosaurs into the weeds in every element you tested. Better driving, handling, better use of space, better sightlines, hugely better mileage, quieter, faster – no contest. Put away your pre-conceived bias and minivans totally own crossovers.

  • ColumWood

    @alexmcyd:disqus You’re going to love our upcoming 2014 Odyssey review!

  • DqsPoster


    We live in CA and have a Sienna and a HiHy and they serve different needs.

    Can the Odyssey or the Sienna or the Quest handle say the 30-mile Titus Canyon drive to Death Valley National park? Can they make it to the Racetrack? Green Water Valley Road? West Side Drive? How about mountain dirt roads with nasty pot holes and ruts in the Sierras? We have seen vans slowing to a snail’s crawl trying to negotiate deep holes and ruts. Both on BLM, NPS and NFS land? These are roads we often must navigate to reach trail heads.

    In the mountains, how about plowing through 6- to 8-inches of snow blocking our driveway on snowy wintery days?

    The van is wonderful on dry paved surface or rain or a little ice and snow. A van simply cannot handle any High-Clearance roads for active families who venture off the beaten paths. None of these crossover are 4x4s, so they are not rock crawlers or mud-plowers but they can go places where only High-Clearance car is needed.

    Hope that helps.

  • alexmcyd

    That goes to show how much an SUV is needed for SUV type duties. I’m guessing that a true SUV with do even better than these at that purpose.
    For this test none of those functions were tested or evaluated.

  • ColumWood
  • Shiratori1

    How many people who own suvs/crossovers have to deal with these conditions on a consistent basis? Hint: very few

  • Materialman

    The Explorer was highly touted but is a bust.

  • Adam Chandley

    It’s been at the bottom of every comparison since it came out.

  • catinpa

    I don’t understand why on most of the leave it lists are the second and third row. That is the main reason my mother is looking for a vehicle like this. Is that recommendation based on the fact there is no leg room and it is a waste of space? The one she is looking at didn’t even make your list.

  • ColumWood

    All of the vehicles listed have sufficient 2nd row legroom for adults, however, some aren’t OVERLY spacious – like the Traverse or Pilot are. We only listed the Pathfinder and Explorer as having less than ideal space for adults in the 2nd row. However, if we listed 3rd row space as a LEAVE IT then in that case, the area is really too small for adults. (I’m glad you brought this up, a clarification of our methodology would be a help for future comparisons like this).

  • Shannon Hummell

    If the Hyundai sante fe XL is on the list then the 2014 Outlander should be on there as well….

  • ColumWood

    @shannonhummell:disqus We actually included the Outlander in our compact crossover comparison. While it is a 3-row crossover, the 3rd row is mostly useless. Check our the comparo here: http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2013/10/2013-2014-compact-crossover-shootout-toyota-rav4-vs-honda-crv-vs-chevy-equinox-vs-subaru-forester-vs-hyundai-santa-fe-sport-vs-mazda-cx5-vs-jeep-compass-vs-mitsubishi-outlander.html

  • Belinda Richards

    Why was a V8 Citadel tested instead of a V6 Limited? You know, to give more credibility and accuracy to your comparison by having all vehicles be as similar as possible? Gotta love grossly weighted reviews like this.

  • ColumWood

    @belindarichards:disqus You make an excellent point and the real answer is simple: that’s the only one Dodge would give us. In many ways the factors even themselves out. The V8 Citadel gets extra marks for features, looks and performance, but loses marks for efficiency and price. We actually thought about dropping it entirely from the comparison, however, the as-tested price is barely more than the Ford Explorer’s.

  • TractorDriver

    So the winner of the 3-Row Crossover Test scored near the bottom in: Rear Seat; Third Seat and Cargo Usability!?
    You as the tester need to work harder to acquire more comparable vehicles, and if you can’t then you need to adjust your scoring accordingly.

  • autoguide

    You make a great point! This is why we include our rankings for each vehicle in each category. It allows the reader to examine the data and come to their own conclusions. Someone who values 3rd row space over fuel economy could definitely come to a different conclusion than we did.

  • TJ

    I’d say if you see someone at a gas station with one you have been looking at ask them, or go test drive them for yourself. A test drive does not commit you to anything. Though this test wasn’t very good, it is what they decided they liked, neither of those gentlemen looked like soccer moms and probably would never use the 3rd row.

  • Adam Chandley

    orr….. the ratings are for sale. You seriously couldn’t get your hands on a Highlander Limited AWD w/ adv tech like every other reviewer on the planet got for their comparison test? Pfft. All of the things you dinged Toyota on – you could have gleaned from their website alone. That’s ok – if Dodge and Hyundai bought your review, just say it. We understand.

  • ImNotTheWalrus

    The Hyundai rides like a garbage truck

  • Elancore

    No it doesn’t, I have the Grand limited Santa Fe and it’s perfect. If you don’t believe it go check reviews everywhere.

  • Curious_G

    The reviews “everywhere” say it is undersprung and bottoms out easily. Most also cite ponderous /wallowy handling. A real shame as everything else seems pretty good.

  • Mike

    I’d take the Toyota hands down. First, Toyota has the world’s best resale on their vehicles(for a reason-QUALITY) , and second they are the most dependable, long lasting vehicles. Consumer Reports just did a 12 yr quality comparison of ALL makes, and of course Toyota led the pack. They always do. The Subarus and Hondas did not even come close. Educated buyers always go with a Toyota or a Lexus. And almost all Toyota models are made in America with largely American made parts. Forget Government Motors and Ford, who both have been backsliding in quality the past year and a half. Kia and Hyundai will give anyone a vehicle, regardless of their credit. What does that tell you about their vehicles? Their quality is also mixed.

  • TJ

    I wont debate Toyota, as they have proven them selves as a manufacture, but I love it how people always put Kia and Hyundai’s quality into question. Have you ever owned one? I have two and one of them is ten years old with 120,000 miles, my local mechanic does a “wish list” when he looks at cars, basically a list of things that are going bad or need to be replaced. My car has a cracked headlight assembly on that list and nothing else. Sure when Kia and Hyundia first came to the US their cars werent that good and had issues, they have since fixed that. Thus the 10 year 100k warranty, that you can even extend past that. They learned from Deawoo, maybe own before you judge. I will never own a Toyota because of the people that drive them in my town.

  • Mike

    Actually TJ my other half owns a new Kia Sportage and loves it. I see all the cost cutting inside. Built nothing like my Toyota. And while I agree they have increased their quality by a wide margin, they are VERY behind Toyota in regards to quality. Pick up this month’s copy of Consumer Reports and see how they are fairing. Not much better than GM or Ford. Their quality has been slipping. Not a hater, but I buy the things that are going to last me the longest. You and my partner both live their Kia/Hyundai automobiles, and that’s all that matters. I’m not making the payments. We should all drive what we want to. Stay well!

  • bd

    Toyota has done more cost-cutting inside (compare the interior of the Optima to the Camry).
    And reliability differs (good that for Toyota that these reliability studies don’t take into account recalls) – for AutoBild, which not only looks at service records, but even disassembles vehicles, Hyundai has been no. 1 for the past 2 years).
    Furthermore, when was the last time Toyota has launched a new powertrain? Same goes for Lexus where the IS, GS and LS are soldiering on with outdated powertrains (easy to be reliable mechanically when you don’t make any major changes).
    Toyotas today are being sold on price (deep discounting).

  • Mike

    Whatever makes you feel better. Consumer Reports goes back 12 yrs and a Hyundai or a Kia is nowhere near a Toyota in long term reliability. Keep your Hyundai/Kia in your trailer park. They’ll give a surprime loan to anybody dumb enough to buy their vehicles. ANYBODY. And good luck on that resale value which is beyond HORRID.

  • Adam Chandley

    Resale value has so much to do with how cheap you can actually buy one with the right connections. That silly mouse car? Easily get 6K off MSRP. Thus why it’s got a horribly low trade in value after 1 year.

  • Shiratori1

    Yeah, it’s official: you are nothing but an astroturfer and a shill for Kia/Hyundai. What a loser……..

  • bd

    Yeah, like all the auto-publications haven’t noted the cost-cutting that Toyota has done.
    Compare Toyota to Honda (or Mazda these days) – it’s not even close.
    And ooh – the ad hominem attacks (talk about being a loser…)

  • Shiratori1

    Keep on trolling buddy. You are still a shill and an astroturfer nonetheless.

  • Phil

    Point is, kia and hyundai are still nowhere near as reliable as the leading japonese brands. Fact!

  • bd

    Good thing for Toyota that recalls aren’t included in reliability studies and when was the last time Toyota updated their power/drive-trains?
    At one time, Buicks were at the top of reliability surveys since GM didn’t make any changes to them.
    And AutoBild, which looks at actual service records, as well as disassembling vehicles themselves, has had Hyundai ranked no.1 for reliability the past 2 years.

  • Adam Chandley

    In the same way that Honda just had to fork out an unprecedented fine for not reporting faults. Just because Hyundai is on top doesn’t mean they got there honestly. The 2.4L I4 that comes in nearly everything they sell eats bearings for breakfast. Have a rod knock in your 11-14 2.4L Hyundai? Not a problem – they keep short blocks in stock just for this reason and can have a whole new bottom end installed by the end of the day. They do it that often…

  • Adam Chandley

    If you compare a Camry LE to an Optima SXL, you’re going to have a bad time. Comparing a Camry XLE to an Optima SXL is a different story. The Camry V6 is a 2GR-FS rocket, still gets great MPG, and the interior will be top notch for the price. The Optima 2.0T has loads of torque, but a failure to deliver. Check out what happened for 2015 – they’ve detuned (or simply de-rated) ALL of the Korean brand engines. The 2.0T is now a 240hp limp noodle, the 3.3L V6 is 260. Whereas Toyota’s been using the 2GR since 2006 and hasn’t changed a thing – probably wont for the foreseeable future.

    Likewise, Compare a Camry LE to a base Optima. They both enjoy frequent rotation at the Enterprise rental counter – and both are pretty dreadfully plain.

  • Jeff

    You are full of crap! You are not a car guy Mike!

  • Mike


  • Fred2202350

    Although one poster does talk about how these vehicles handle rougher roads in parks and back in the hills (NOT off-road) in a way minivans can’t, for the huge majority of buyers, I’d hark back to one major car mag’s comparison test, which ended one paragraph in which it described some characteristic lacks that only a few SUV’s avoided, with something like “I think its time we admit this (3-row SUV’s) is a bogus category for 95% of buyers. They need a minivan but their vanity won’t let them buy one”. I’ve got a 10 year-old Mazda MPV and I really don’t know what will replace it some day. There’s nothing that size that will do everything it does as reasonably anymore.

  • Adam Chandley

    Perhaps, I dunno, you might consider a 3-row SUV? The MPV was on the micro side of the van segment, so changing over to the mid-size SUV isn’t much of a leap. Every one of these entrants are available with FWD to minimize cost, maximize MPG, and keep you a safe distance from any rough terrain habits. We bought the 14 highlander the day it landed. I believe this comparison is quite unfair as they’ve compared a the mid-option highlander to fully optioned everything else – yet it still came in 3rd. If it had the 4 missing points it was deducted for features, it’d have won this test hands down.

    Real world hwy MPG – 26, legendary toyota 2GR-FE is competent even when towing a 2-axle trailer, the seats (1st and 2nd) are the most comfortable and offer the most leg room, and the ride quality is simply unmatched. If i were you, I’d look into a 14 Highlander XLE 2WD in the future. Also note – it gets TSP from the IIHS where you stand a good chance of being safe in a small overlap collision. VERY FEW SUVs pass muster.

  • bd

    Not the 1st time the Santa Fe has come 1st in a comparison test – the Santa Fe/ SF Sport have usually finished near if not at the top in a no. of comparison tests – so not out of the ordinary.

  • Shiratori1

    Keep on trolling, astroturfer…….

  • House Martell

    Dodge Durango: He’s the top of the west, always cool, he’s the best. He keeps alive with its Hemi V8.

  • muddie1

    Why wasn’t the Mazda CX-9 in this review? It also has a 3rd row seat and is a midsize CUV.

« Back

AutoGuide.com’s Monthly Overlay Newsletter Signup – By subscribing to our email newsletter, Entrants are eligible to win one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card (value of $100.00 USD). One (1) winner will be chosen every month at random and contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. *Amazon.com is not a sponsor of this promotion. Except as required by law, Amazon.com Gift Cards ("GCs") cannot be transferred for value or redeemed for cash. GCs may be used only for purchases of eligible goods at Amazon.com or certain of its affiliated websites. For complete terms and conditions, see www.amazon.com/gc-legal. GCs are issued by ACI Gift Cards, Inc., a Washington corporation. All Amazon ®, ™ & © are IP of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. No expiration date or service fees.


2. PRIZE: One (1) Winner will be randomly selected every month to each receive: one (1) $100.00 Amazon.com Gift Card (the “Prize Supplier”). Total approximate retail value of all prizes is approximately $100.00 USD. Prizes are not transferable and no cash or prize substitution is allowed. Prize package is awarded "as is" with no warranty or guarantee, either express or implied.

3. ELIGIBILITY: From the time of entry through the final date of prize fulfillment, each contest entrant and selected entrant must be a permanent lawful citizen and resident residing in the 50 United States or the District of Columbia or in Canada, and be twenty one (21) years of age or older. VOID IN PUERTO RICO, THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, IN ALL FOREIGN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ALL OTHER U.S. TERRITORIES OR CANADA AND POSSESSIONS AND WHERE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. Employees, officers, directors, agents and representatives, of the Sponsor and the Prize Supplier and each of their respective parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, promotion partners and any entity involved in the development, production, implementation, administration or fulfillment of this Sweepstakes, and the immediate family members (e.g., spouse, mother, father, sister, brother, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, grandparent, in-law, daughter and son, regardless of where they live) and persons living in the same household (whether or not related) of such individuals are not eligible to participate or win. Only one selected entrant per household. All decisions of the Sponsor with respect to this sweepstakes are final. The Sponsor shall have the right at any time to require proof of identity and failure to provide such proof may result in disqualification from the Sweepstakes.

4. ENTER BY INTERNET: You may enter this sweepstakes via the Internet by logging onto AutoGuide.com and subscribing to our email newsletter via the pop-up overlay.

5. SELECTION OF WINNER: One (1) Entrant will be selected by random selection who have subscribed to our email newsletter. The winner may be announced publicly on AutoGuide.com and will be contacted by VerticalScope Inc.’s staff. The winner will be required to provide a mailing address (that is not a P.O. box) to receive the prize which will be shipped free of charge.

6. ODDS OF WINNING: Odds of winning a prize are determined by the total number of eligible entries received.

7. RESTRICTIONS: The prize package consists of one (1) Amazon.com Gift Card with an approximate value of $100.00 USD. If prize cannot be awarded due to circumstances beyond the control of the Sponsor or Prize Supplier, no substitute prize will be awarded due to the unique nature of the prize. Sponsor and Prize Supplier shall not be liable to the winner or any person claiming through winner for failure to supply the prize or any part thereof, by reason of any acts of God, any action(s), regulation(s), order(s) or request(s) by any governmental or quasi-governmental entity (whether or not the action(s), regulations(s), order(s) or request(s) prove(s) to be invalid), equipment failure, utility failure, internet failure, terrorist acts, threatened terrorist acts, air raid, blackout, act of public enemy, earthquake, war (declared or undeclared), fire, flood, epidemic, explosion, unusually severe weather, hurricane, embargo, labor dispute or strike (whether legal or illegal) labor or material shortage, transportation interruption of any kind, work slow-down, civil disturbance, insurrection, riot, or any other cause beyond Sponsor's or Prize Supplier's control (collectively, "Force Majeure Event"). Sponsor shall not be responsible for any cancellations, delays, diversions or substitutions or any act or omissions whatsoever by the performers/events, other transportation companies or any other persons providing any of these services and accommodations to passengers including any results thereof such as changes in services or accommodations necessitated by same.

8. CONDITIONS: By entering the Sweepstakes, entrants agree to be bound by the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions and that Sponsor has the irrevocable right to use in perpetuity entrants' names, user names, likenesses, photographs, voices, home mailing address, biographical and prize information, and entry materials, without notice to entrants and without compensation or obligation, in any and all media now or hereafter known throughout the world, in any manner whatsoever, to advertise and promote Sponsor, its products and services, the Sweepstakes, and for any other purpose except where prohibited by law. Entrant waives the right to assert as a cost of winning a prize any and all costs of verification and redemption or travel to redeem said prize and any liability which might arise from redeeming or seeking to redeem said prize. Sponsor is not responsible for fraudulent calls or emails made to entrants not by the Sponsor. If the Sweepstakes is not capable of running as planned by reason of damage by computer viruses, worms or bugs, tampering, unauthorized intervention, fraud, technical limitations or failures, any Force Majeure Event or any other cause which, in the sole opinion of Sponsor, could corrupt, compromise, undermine or otherwise affect the administration, security, fairness, integrity, viability or proper conduct of the Sweepstakes, Sponsor reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend all or any part of the Sweepstakes, and to select a winner from among all eligible entries received by Sponsor up until the time of such cancellation, termination, modification or suspension, as applicable. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual that (i) tampers or attempts to tamper with the entry process or the operations of this Sweepstakes in any manner, (ii) violates the Official Rules, Terms and Conditions or (iii) acts in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner, or with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other person. CAUTION: ANY ATTEMPT BY AN ENTRANT OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THIS SWEEPSTAKES IS A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS. SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND/OR DAMAGES FROM ANY SUCH PERSON TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. Any expenses and receipt and use of the prize and federal, state and local taxes and fees applicable in connection with the prize awarded are the sole responsibility of the winner. An IRS Form 1099 will be issued in the name of the winner for the actual value of the prize received. This Sweepstakes is subject to all federal, state and local laws of the United States. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. Sponsor, Prize Supplier, and their respective officers, directors, parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries and advertising and promotion agencies, employees, representatives and agents are not responsible for and shall not be liable for (i) any injuries, losses or damages of any kind caused by a prize resulting from acceptance, possession or usage of the prize, or (ii) printing, distribution or production errors. Sponsor or its affiliates may rescind any promotion found to contain such errors without liability at its or their sole discretion.

9. SPONSOR: The Sponsor of this contest is VerticalScope Inc. (the owner and operator of AutoGuide.com), 111 Peter Street, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1.

Subscribe to our email newsletter and automatically be entered to win.
*Restrictions apply. See offer for details

Get Breaking Automotive News, Reviews and Video in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked