2015 Kia Sedona vs. 2015 Toyota Sienna

Stylish Kings of Practicality


In the world of family friendly motoring, nothing beats a minivan.

Like a fanny pack, they may not by stylish or cool, but they are incredibly useful. Although it’s a bit hard to convince people your product is the shiz, many manufacturers are trying hard to make the minivan more stylish. Toyota started this trend with the Sienna SE referring to it as the ‘Swagger Wagon’. This year, it’s Kia’s turn to create a stylish family hauler with the 2015 Sedona.

It’s obvious that Kia’s engineers studied the Sienna hard before introducing the all-new Sedona. So much of the new minivan mimics that of the Toyota. The two vans are within an inch of each other in total length, have a similar profile and weigh nearly the same.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Strikingly Similar

Not only is the new Sedona’s shape similar to the Sienna, but other aspects are nearly identical as well. The way the third row seats folds, the design of the second row of seats, the small front three quarter windows, the third row window shades, the dual opening moon roofs and the list goes on and on.

SEE ALSO: 2015 Toyota Sienna Review

There are some differences though, mostly when it comes to equipment. The Sedona can be had with options not offered in the Sienna like cooled seats, recordable satellite radio and an around view camera. SedonaExterior6The Sienna counters with options of its own like the easy speak system that allows the driver to speak to third row passengers through the van’s speakers and an actual factory installed DVD system. With the Sedona, a rear entertainment system is a dealer installed option and is a less useful center console flip-up design.

Both vans have comfortable, well-laid-out interiors. I prefer the look of the Sedona’s interior, but the Sienna wins for ease of use. Some of the controls on the Sedona’s infotainment unit require a very far reach and the software isn’t as user friendly. I also prefer the Sienna’s chunkier, all leather steering wheel to the Sedona’s thinner wheel that features a smooth, polished upper portion.


Hauling People, Hauling Stuff

Like the Sienna, the Sedona’s second row of seats can slide forward and back and feature a flip-up footrest. Unlike the Sienna, the Kia’s seats can also move side to side, which may be a cool feature or just a SiennaInterior6compensating factor since that the seats can’t slide all the way back when set to their most outboard position. The armrests in the Sedona can also be angled down, which is a nice feature when reclining the seat to position the arm rests at the appropriate angle.

With 40.6-inches, Kia offers three more inches of standard legroom for second row passengers than Toyota, but the Sedona’s sunroof does impede a bit on headroom. In the third row, things switch as the Sienna’s SedonaInterior536.3-inches of legroom trumps the Sedona’s 34.8-inches. Headroom is also 1.5-inches less in the Sedona, which compounded with the Kia’s lower seat cushion, makes it much tighter in the back of the Sedona.

Somehow, despite the vans being the same size, not only does Toyota offer more passenger space, but there is more cargo room as well. With 39.1 cubic feet of room behind the third row, I was able to fit more toddler-friendly gear in the Sienna’s hatch compared to the Sedona’s that can only haul 33.9 cubic feet. As mentioned, the third rows folds in nearly the exact same way, but I did find the Sedona’s seats took more effort to stow into the hatch’s cargo well.


Simple to Drive, Despite the Size

Both vans come equipped with V6 engines and six-speed automatic transmissions that send power to the front wheels. The Sienna is also available with all-wheel drive for those in messier climates, whereas the Sedona is not.

SiennaExterior7Even with a smaller 3.3-liter V6 engine, the Sedona’s 276 HP and 248 lb-ft. of torque trumps the Sienna’s 3.5-liter V6 that produces 266 HP and 245 lb-ft. of torque. Despite the power advantage, the Sedona’s engine feels adequate at best as the transmission is slow to react and not the smoothest unit on the market. The Sienna, on the other hand, has a great drivetrain. Quick to respond and smooth in operation, it’s everything I’d ask for in a family friendly vehicle.

SEE ALSO: 2015 Kia Sedona Review

A hallmark of any good minivan, both vehicles are incredibly easy to drive. The Sedona does feel slightly larger from behind the wheel and a little harder to maneuver in tight spaces. But the seating position behind the wheel of the Kia is excellent, much like in the Toyota. Comfort for the driver is top notch and sightlines are good due to the two vehicle’s boxy shapes.

Compare Specs

2015 Kia Sedona
2015 Toyota Sienna
Vehicle 2015 Kia Sedona Advantage 2015 Toyota Sienna
Engine 3.3 L V6 - 3.5 L V6
Horsepower 276 HP Sedona 266 HP
Torque 248 lb-ft. - 245 lb-ft.
Weight 4,656 lbs. Sienna 4,560 lbs.
2nd Row Legroom 40.6-inches Sedona 37.6-inches
3rd Row Legroom 34.8-inches Sienna 36.3-inches
Rear Cargo 33.9 cubic feet Sienna 39.1 cubic feet
Fuel Economy (US) 17 MPG city, 22 MPG hwy Sienna 18 MPG city, 25 MPG hwy
Fuel Economy (CDN) 14.2 L/100 km city, 10.5 L/100 km hwy Sienna 13.0 L/100 km city, 9.5 L/100 km hwy
Starting Price(US) $26,995 Sedona $29,485
Starting Price(CDN) $29,210 Sedona $32,730
As Tested Price(US) $43,295 Sedona $46,300
As Tested Price(CDN) $47,710 Sedona $48,710

It’s All About Value After All

Space and ease of use are important when looking at a minivan, but so is value. Starting at $26,995 after destination charges, the Kia Sedona undercuts a base Sienna by roughly $2,500. As tested, the loaded up Sedona Limited with the technology package tops out at a hefty $43,295. But, that still is less cheddar than the Sienna Limited’s as tested price of $46,300.

SedonaInterior3And that price doesn’t include the additional technology package offered in the Sienna that can drive up the bottom line even further or a warranty as good as Kia’s 10 year powertrain coverage.

But the Sienna does offer the Toyota Care program that gives owners two-year free maintenance and a fully loaded Sienna is more fuel efficient with official ratings of 18 MPG city and 25 MPG highway compared to the Sedona’s ratings of 17 MPG city and 22 MPG highway. Plus, the Sienna achieves a Top Safety Pick+ crash test rating from the IIHS while the Sedona is only a Top Safety Pick.


The Verdict: 2015 Kia Sedona vs. 2015 Toyota Sienna

The new 2015 Kia Sedona is a stylish, liveable minivan that’s a big improvement over the previous Sedona. But it can’t quite match the Sienna’s space, comfort and ease of operation. As hard as Kia’s engineers tried, they couldn’t quite make a better Toyota Sienna, than the Toyota Sienna.

2015 Kia Sedona

2015 Toyota Sienna

  • bd

    Wouldn’t exactly refer to the Sienna as “stylish.”

  • bcl187

    Watch out for the new Chrysler Caravan! 9 spd auto…awd…3.6 engine…new stow n go system….Toyota ur days are numbered….Chrysler owns the van Game!

  • Globalgunner

    The previous generation Sienna was a pretty `good looking vehicle. This one just looks like a whale. Why do Toyota always have to make each new model uglier than the previous. The European makes like Citroen, Peugeot and Ford somehow manage to make boxy vans that still appeal to the eyes.

  • Chris

    Hahahahhahahahahahahhahaahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaha. Ok I’m done.

  • Niko Lotta

    I just drove all the 2015/2016 Sedona, the 2015 Sienna, and the 2015 Odyssey. We have already owned three minivans (two Hondas and a Toyota) and you can pretty much forget all the stats and mathematical calculations.

    The Sedona, while a major improvement over the previous generation, is still not up to par with the Odyssey and Sienna. The options packages are a mess (try to get a sunroof in a mid-line or right-seats in a high-line), the entertainment package is a dealer-installed afterthought and poorly located, you cannot remove the second-row seats, the third-row doesn’t fold flush with the floor, and the engine sounds like it is shredding aluminum cans.

    If money is your biggest stressor, then but the Kia, but if “value” and “functionality” are the driving factors, move along to the Honda or Toyota. If you need AWD, then buy the Toyota. If you don’t, but the eight-seat Honda. If like us, you want eight-seats and AWD, then continue to be frustrated until at least the 2017 model.

    Ultimately, we traded our ’08 Odyssey for a new Odyssey, but we will have an AWD SIenna, too, and won’t eventually let go of that one without a similar replacement.

  • Niko Lotta

    Actually, it will be the Town & Country; the Caravan is officially dead. As far as the rest of your predictions, I’ll reserve judgement until later, but they make an inferior product.

    Sales numbers aside, the rental market has artificially propped up the Chrysler product for a while now. I live in an area of the country loaded with minivans. Don’t know a single family that owns a T&C or Caravan.

    But never mind the real-world checkup, check out the latest Consumer Reports tests, where they rounded up the nine newest models. The Honda was number one…again. Rounding out the bottom three were the Chrysler, Dodge, and Kia, in that order.

  • Pickles

    I’m not sure why everyone thinks the Kia is stylish. The concept was beyond cool. This thing is mearly ok. Tacky slider tracks, clunky side window treatment. Meh. Then there’s the bizarre choice Kia made to make the 2nd row seats 100% UNremovable. Stupid. The Sienna looks expensive, timeless, clean and purposeful. Plus it’s a terrific ride. Toyota wins over and over.

  • Paul621

    I have owned-driven these since the introduction of the original Sienna. I drive a lot, and the vans have averaged close to 300K miles before replacing with the next one.
    I have tried/driven other models, and one HUGE advantage the Toyota has that is not mentioned here is the center console opening.

    It shows well in the photos here, but isn’t mentioned in the text.

    Driving long roads lets you relax your body, and in the Sienna your legs can relax with width galore. On the other models I feel I’m in a “constricted” space when driving. It’s VERY noticeable.

  • Georgiaboy1

    I don’t know about Kia’s warranty now, but years ago when they were copying the Ford Windstar they had a 100,000 mile warranty. The problem with it was it was only applicable to the original buyer and if you sold it, didn’t transfer to the second buyer.