Jeep Grand Cherokee Fails "Moose Test" by Swedish Publication

Luke Vandezande
by Luke Vandezande

This isn’t supposed to be a problem anymore, but a Swedish publication found during its “moose test” that even at moderate speeds the Jeep Grand Cherokee is at serious risk for a potentially fatal rollover.

Vehicles are set to a certain speed during the test, in the Jeep’s case 39.5 mph, before the driver swerves through some cones in a simulation meant to mimic a panic situation. The previous generation Grand Cherokee passed the same test in 2005 without any problems, but as you can see in the image above, the truck rises quickly onto two wheels.

It’s a situation that would likely prove fatal for an unprepared driver, and one that other vehicles proved competent in avoiding — even at higher speeds. Those cars included a BMW X5, Volkswagen Toureg and Volvo XC90, all of which passed the test at 43.5 mph.

It’s not clear why the SUV performed so poorly, especially as, like most modern SUVs, it uses a sophisticated stability control system mean to intervene and prevent such dangerous situations.

In April of 2010, Consumer Reports gave the Lexus GX460 a Do Not Buy rating after it showed a similar reaction in that publication’s tests.

[Source: Teknikens Värld]

Luke Vandezande
Luke Vandezande

Luke is an energetic automotive journalist who spends his time covering industry news and crawling the internet for the latest breaking story. When he isn't in the office, Luke can be found obsessively browsing used car listings, drinking scotch at his favorite bar and dreaming of what to drive next, though the list grows a lot faster than his bank account. He's always on <A title="@lukevandezande on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/lukevandezande">Twitter</A> looking for a good car conversation. Find Luke on <A title="@lukevandezande on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/lukevandezande">Twitter</A> and <A title="Luke on Google+" href="http://plus.google.com/112531385961538774338?rel=author">Google+</A>.

More by Luke Vandezande

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
Next