Cadillac XTS Won't Reach a Second Generation

Stephen Elmer
by Stephen Elmer
2014 Cadillac XTS Vsport Twin Turbo V6; New York City Media Drive; August 22, 2013 (Richard Prince/Cadillac Photo).

Cadillac has decided to let go of the XTS.

The brand will not replace the XTS when it reaches the end of its lifecycle in 2019 according to brand boss Johan de Nysschen. For the time being, the CT6 will serve as the brand’s flagship model, although a new larger sedan likely named the CT7 or CT8 will eventually join the ranks.

“Ultimately, a car like XTS when it reaches the end of its lifecycle, will not be replaced,” Johan de Nysschen told GM Inside News.

SEE ALSO: 2016 Cadillac CT6 is Legit Luxury

Cadillac’s boss also revealed that there will be no direct successor to the CTS or ATS, alluding that their replacements will be entirely new models. “As we move into the future refining our sedan portfolio, there will be no direct successor to the CTS. There will be no direct successor to the ATS. There is no point to renaming those cars because in the future those cars will disappear,” said Johan de Nysschen.

With the demise of the XTS, Cadillac will no longer have a car suitable for coachbuilders to turn into hearses or limousines. “We will not have a car that will lend itself to these kind of modifications and we will probably withdraw from those markets,” de Nysschen said.

[Source: GM Inside News]

Discuss this story at our Cadillac Forum

Stephen Elmer
Stephen Elmer

Stephen covers all of the day-to-day events of the industry as the News Editor at AutoGuide, along with being the AG truck expert. His truck knowledge comes from working long days on the woodlot with pickups and driving straight trucks professionally. When not at his desk, Steve can be found playing his bass or riding his snowmobile or Sea-Doo. Find Stephen on <A title="@Selmer07 on Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com/selmer07">Twitter</A> and <A title="Stephen on Google+" href="http://plus.google.com/117833131531784822251?rel=author">Google+</A>

More by Stephen Elmer

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
Next