2015 Lexus NX200t Vs. Mercedes-Benz GLA 250

Mike Schlee
by Mike Schlee

Small crossovers continue to pop up like bunnies on an unregulated breeding farm.

Hotter than Soul Train in the 1970s, manufacturers continue to churn out high riding little five-doors, filling every possible niche. Priced high and low, if there’s a specific customer want, there’ll be a crossover waiting to fill that need.

Following the market demand for smaller, more attainable premium crossovers, both Lexus and Mercedes have added new offerings for 2015. Called the Lexus NX and Mercedes-Benz GLA, these two crossovers are smaller and lower priced than any other crossover or SUV offered by these luxury automakers. But are they any good?

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Compact vs Sub-Compact

Let’s get to the elephant in the room right away: size. At first glance it might not look like these two vehicles are direct competitors. With nearly nine inches of extra length, the NX fits the mold of a compact crossover, while the GLA is more of a sub-compact crossover. Even if the NX is closer in size to the Mercedes-Benz GLK, the pricing, option packaging and target customer of the Lexus closer reflects that of the smaller GLA.

SEE ALSO: 2015 Lexus NX Review

With that in mind, we gathered a 2015 Lexus NX200T F Sport and 2015 Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 4Matic to see which is the better low-priced, premium crossover. As tested, these two vehicles come with similar levels of equipment and a price tag separated by less than $100; coming in at just over $45,000. If that seems like a lot of money, both crossovers can be had for substantially less.

Two-Liter Turbos Rule the Day

Two-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engines have quickly become the standard for small luxury crossovers. Audi, BMW and even Lincoln are using them. Well, add two more manufactures to that list – Lexus and Mercedes.

Producing 258 lb-ft of torque in both vehicles, the Lexus holds a distinct power advantage, making 235 hp compared to the Mercedes’ 208 hp. Despite the power difference, both vehicles are expected to run from 0 to 60 MPH in just over seven seconds. How? Weight and gearing, that’s how.

Real World Power vs. Real World Efficiency

The smaller 3,428-lb GLA has a 600-lb weight advantage over the NX and comes equipped with a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission unlike the Lexus’ more conventional six-speed automatic. But even if the numbers say both vehicles are equally quick, the NX200T feels faster. Power delivery is smooth and robust, like there’s more power than numbers suggest. A quick stab of the accelerator pedal has the NX building speed effortlessly. The GLA on the other hand is always a bit delayed in its actions. Slow off the line thanks to a jerky dual-clutch transmission we’ve never been in love with, the Mercedes feels initially lethargic. But once you get underway, the transmission performs well and power isn’t an issue.

With less power and lighter weight, there’s no shock that the GLA 250 4Matic is more fuel efficient. Officially rated at 24 MPG city and 32 MPG highway, the GLA holds a three MPG advantage in the city and four MPG on the highway compared to the Lexus NX200T F Sport. During our real world testing, the Mercedes absolutely destroyed the Lexus by extending the gap further, with an observed average 29.4 MPG vs the GLA’s 24.3 MPG.

Handling vs. Comfort

When it comes to ride and handling, the two have dramatically different designs. As hard as it tries to be a crossover, the GLA is really a slightly taller hatchback. It’s more nimble than the NX and its smaller footprint and lighter curb weight are obvious in city driving.

In contrast, the NX drives like a crossover. It’s not some big unwieldy monster to drive, but the difference compared to the GLA is noticeable and it and feels more planted. It has a softer, more comfortable ride that adds a bit of refinement missing in the GLA. Both vehicles are acceptably quiet to suit the prestigious badges adorning their rear hatches.

A Matter of Space

We won’t dwell much on space because it’s a no-brainer that the larger NX200T offers more. Rear seat space in the NX is more than acceptable as adult passengers have ample head and legroom. The armrests are set at appropriate heights and are nicely padded. Best of all, the seat backs can recline for proper lounging. The GLA can fit rear passengers, but legroom is adequate at best and headroom is a bit of an issue. The seat cushions are set low and the seatback angle is a bit too upright.

SEE ALSO: Five-Point Inspection: 2015 Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 4MATIC

We were surprised at how close cargo capacity is for these two crossovers. The larger NX only carries an extra half cubic foot of gear and has a higher load floor. The GLA may have a narrower opening, but the overall shape can be more usable.

Compare Specs

2015 Lexus NX 200t
2015 Mercedes GLA 250 4Matic
Vehicle 2015 Lexus NX 200t Advantage 2015 Mercedes GLA 250 4Matic
Engine 2.0 L turbocharged four cylinder - 2.0 L turbocharged four cylinder
Horsepower 235 hp NX 208 hp
Max. Torque 258 lb-ft - 258 lb-ft
Fuel Economy (US) 21 MPG city / 28 MPG hwy GLA 24 MPG city / 32 MPG hwy
Fuel Economy (CDN) 10.8 L/100 km city, 8.8 L/100 km highway GLA9.8 L/100 km city, 7.4 L/100 km highway
Observed MPG 24.3 MPG GLA 29.4 MPG
Weight 4,050 lbs. GLA 3,428 lbs.
Front Legroom 42.8” NX 41.9”
Rear Legroom 36.1” NX 33.9”
Cargo Capacity Rear Seats Up 17.7 cu. ft. NX 17.2 cu. ft.
Cargo Capacity Rear Seats Down 54.6 cu. ft. NX 42.0 cu. ft.
Starting Price (US) $38,905 GLA $34,225
Starting Price (CDN) $42,945 -$39,295
As Tested Price (US) $45,245 - $45,345
As Tested Price (CDN) $52,345 GLA $47,265

Old School vs. Frustration

The one area where the GLA really shines in comparison to the Lexus is usability. Sure, the interior looks outdated because there’s a mess of buttons on the dashboard and Mercedes’ COMAND infotainment system isn’t the best on the market, but compared to Lexus’ Remote Touch Interface (RTI), it’s great.

The RTI system in the NX uses a touchpad in the center console similar to what you would find on a laptop computer. It’s as precise to use as a rocket launcher is for ice sculpting. In my opinion, RTI is one of the least user-friendly interfaces on the market. At least there are a few redundant controls in the NX like a volume and tuning dial so simple tasks, like changing a radio station, aren’t completely infuriating.

The Verdict

Mercedes did a good job shrinking down the Brand’s design elements in creating the GLA. But we find it’s lacking the refinement and quality expected from Mercedes-Benz. The interior and driving experience leave a bit to be desired and do not reflect Mercedes’ larger crossover offerings. A good first attempt at a more entry-level product for the North American market, the GLA comes up a bit short.

And we don’t mean that figuratively either. Even if these two vehicles were the same size, the Lexus still offers more for the money. The NX feels and acts like a proper Lexus. It has better fit and finish inside and drives a lot like a shrunken Lexus RX. For a long time now Lexus has been producing premium vehicles at an affordable price and the NX is no exception.

2015 Lexus NX200t, 2015 Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 


  • Comfortable ride
  • Rear seat space
  • Engine power
  • Seat comfort
  • Handling
  • Fuel economy
  • Easy to operate


  • Fuel economy
  • Infotainment system
  • Looks not for everyone
  • Transmission
  • Cramped backseat
  • Doesn’t feel like a Mercedes-Benz
Mike Schlee
Mike Schlee

A 20+ year industry veteran, Mike rejoins the AutoGuide team as the Managing Editor. He started his career at a young age working at dealerships, car rentals, and used car advertisers. He then found his true passion, automotive writing. After contributing to multiple websites for several years, he spent the next six years working at the head office of an automotive OEM, before returning back to the field he loves. He is a member of the Automobile Journalists Association of Canada (AJAC), and Midwest Automotive Media Association (MAMA). He's the recipient of a feature writing of the year award and multiple video of the year awards.

More by Mike Schlee

Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Mdoelling Mdoelling on Apr 20, 2016

    My wife owns the GLA as is completely happy with it. It has a lot of the underpinnings of more expensive Mercedes but at about $10,000 less. (We were able to buy it through USAA's car buyer plan and saved a few thousand on the car.) The GLA has a tight cabin, so is in my view a micro-suv/hatchback. It's not designed for tall people like me, but still is fun to drive and damn fuel efficient. The default mode at startup has the transmission in economy mode and even turns off the car's engine when car is stopped or standing. You can disengage this feature by switching to standard or Sport modes. In Sport mode the car takes off like a flash and has it run 0-60 mph in under 6.6 seconds. Style wise, I consider it short and sexy and the leather and chrome-finish interior gives it a luxurious feel. Despite some of the naysayers the GLA gets a lot of second glances and compliments (not that I am seeking attention). Because the GLA scores well in customer surveys it should have a good resale value down the road.

  • Mike Stoddart Mike Stoddart on Jun 18, 2017

    I think you need to rewrite this bit: "During our real world testing, the Mercedes absolutely destroyed the Lexus by extending the gap further, with an observed average 29.4 MPG vs the GLAs 24.3 MPG."