2016 Mazda CX-9 Review

Mazda has spent years carving out a niche as a purveyor of fun-to-drive cars, and they’ve been very successful—we can’t recall a Mazda we haven’t enjoyed driving. But nothing in the auto biz ever stays the same, so now Mazda wants to be known for cars that are fun-to-drive and luxurious. How’s that going to work out for them?

If our first drive of the new Mazda CX-9 is any indication, it’s going to work out just fine.

We’ll cut to the chase and tell you that the new CX-9 is a Mazda through-and-through. This is the first iteration of Mazda’s big three-row SUV to be designed entirely in-house (while the previous generation CX-9 was co-created with Mazda’s former owner, Ford), something you can tell from the minute you hit the road. With a Skyactiv turbocharged engine under the hood and a Mazda-designed chassis under the driver’s butt, the CX-9 does what Mazdas do best: It comes alive on a curvy road. The engine delivers strong mid-range punch, the steering is precise and reasonably communicative, while the wheels seem determined to maintain their grip on the pavement no matter what the driver does.

During our press presentation, Mazda went to great detail—perhaps too much detail—about the studies they have done to see how humans react to movement. When you walk, your head bounces around like a basketball but your brain subconsciously filters all of that extraneous motion so all you sense is smooth travel. Mazda told us they engineer their suspensions to trigger those same subconscious senses. (At least, we think that’s what they told us; in retrospect it’s all a bit of a blur.) All we know is that if you happen to find yourself on a curvy road, you can drive this family-friendly SUV in a very un-family-friendly way without the adverse results (nauseous tummies, screaming passengers, close encounters with roadside shrubbery) one might expect.


Three Rows With Style

But before you can drive the Mazda CX-9, you must look at it and that in itself is a unique pleasure. Design-wise, this is an unmitigated success: The 2016 CX-9 is an all-new vehicle, yet its resemblance to other Mazdas is so close that it looks instantly familiar. The upright grille juts out a little further and the creases at the back are a bit sharper, an evolution of the design language that graces other Mazda models. The proportions are perfect, the adornment restrained. It just looks right.

Much the same can be said of the interior. The cabin is a huge leap forward compared to other Mazdas. The example we drove had a dash upholstered in brown leather to match the seats, with a swath of real aluminum surrounding the vents that splits the upper and lower sections of the dash. The center console, raised high above the floor to give the CX-9 a more car-like feel, was surrounded in open-grain wood trim. Settling in behind the wheel, it was hard not to think of Audi’s latest interiors. (Had Mazda glued a map onto the instrument panel, we might have been fooled.) The controls are so sensibly laid out that we felt that same sense of instant familiarity triggered by the exterior.


Bear in mind that we were sampling the new top-of-the-line Signature trim; Mazda also supplied a few Grand Touring versions (called GT in Canada), which feature piano-black trim in place of wood. We’ve yet to see the Sport (GS) and Touring (GS-L) interiors, but our experience with other Mazdas of late gives us hope that they will be just as attractive, if not quite as opulent.

Adequate Interior Space


In terms of interior space, the CX-9 is just okay. The second row seats feel comfortable, although not especially generous when compared to some of the CX-9’s competitors. The third row is what you’d expect: A temporary perch best suited to small children. Access to the third row is decent, but second row occupants must slide their seat forward and give up some legroom in order to make the third row humane. If you regularly use that third row—and surveys show that most three-row-SUV owners don’t—you’ll be better served by a larger vehicle like the Honda Pilot or Ford Explorer.

See Also: 2016 Honda Pilot vs Ford Explorer

The best use of the third row may be to fold it down, easily done thanks to big levers located in the seat backs. With the third row stowed, the CX-9 offers 38.2 cubic feet of space, although the floor, slopes upward slightly towards the front of the car. With the third row seats in place, you have 14.4 cubic feet of space, enough for a thorough grocery run.

New Turbo Engine


This being a Mazda, there’s good geeky tech to be found under the hood. The exclusive engine is a 2.5 liter turbocharged four-cylinder driving a six-speed automatic transmission, with the buyer’s choice of front- or all-wheel-drive. Mazda has used some nifty technological trickery to reduce turbo lag, including restricting exhaust flow out of the engine at low RPMs in order to increase the speed of exhaust hitting the turbocharger. Floor the accelerator from a stop—something the engineers warned us would not necessarily portray the engine in its best light—and the CX-9 moves off smartly, then really picks up its skirts as the turbo starts to do its thing. More importantly, the CX-9 can pick up speed on the highway without the need to downshift below 5th gear. However, power does trail off at higher RPMs, and that can make passing on a two-laner a bit disconcerting. The CX-9 leaps ahead, then seems to run out of steam for a brief tick before the transmission upshifts and drops the engine back down into its powerband.


There’s good tech to be found elsewhere in the Mazda CX-9, including a full-color head-up display (projected onto the windshield rather than the flimsy plastic screen used in lesser Mazdas), blind spot warning, collision mitigation and avoidance, and a lane-departure system that vibrates the steering wheel as a warning (no beeping beepers or flashing lights to let your passengers know you weren’t paying attention) and then tries to gently nudge the car back into its lane. But it’s clear Mazda isn’t quite on the cutting edge as the adaptive cruise control system won’t bring the car to a full stop, and while the front seats are heated, they aren’t cooled.


The Verdict: 2016 Mazda CX-9 Review

Overall, you can color us impressed by the new Mazda CX-9. Mazda has managed to imbue the CX-9 with a real sense of luxury while strengthening the design language, and yet they haven’t lost the trademark fun-to-drive factor that we’ve come to expect (and love). If this is the new direction for Mazda, we can’t wait to see what’s next.

  • Rocket

    I love the styling inside and out, but I have a lot of reservations about that powertrain. For a FWD vehicle, it’s also packaged quite poorly. The Edge, which is nearly a foot shorter, has more cargo space behind the second row. Giving a FWD vehicle RWD proportions might improve the styling, but you pay for it interior volume. Speaking of the Edge, my how I would love to see the Edge Sport’s 2.7T in the Signature trim.

  • Mr. Alderson

    it sucks that there is no android auto and apple car play. big loss of points there

  • Christopher Schaffer

    Kinda sucks you pay that much for the “Signature Line” and don’t get ventilated seats.


    Mazda is really good yet stupid American suckers keep buying Toyo and Hondud. vPathetic losers.

  • Isend2C

    Kinda lame that they still haven’t updated their adaptive cruise – but I think it does have collision mitigation so it’ll slam the brakes right? And no cooled seats? I’ll stick with Hyundai who does both (though they are not as engaging, I also don’t have to fret about running out of warranty)




  • AND YOU ARE A BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!



    fk off and get back in the rice paddy. HA HA HA

  • Danny

    says the one who lives his life as a pathetic excuse for mankind’s mistakes

  • Christopher Schaffer

    look at his profile…he replies with that broken english comment to EVERYTHING.

  • Christopher Schaffer

    Sooooo…went to the Mazda dealership to check out the 9. Here’s what I found:

    The third row isn’t too bad, though as described in the review, the occupants knees are high, but the position isn’t uncomfortable if the seats forward are set forward enough.

    Occupants in the second row are able to place their feet under the front seats, so that helps a lot. As a whole, all of the seats are very comfortable.

    The car rides just as you’d expect from Mazda- all fun. The drive was on very twisty back roads- just as one would see on television ads. The salesman also owned a Mazda3 and wanted to see the car hammered. Haven’t driven a FWD car in a long time (all been 4WD or AWD), and I got the front end loose a few times…all soooo much fun! Great pickup, no lag, quiet, responsive.

    I felt the instrument cluster was, well, clustered, but useable I guess; would take some time to get used to. The steering wheel didn’t reach as far as I would’ve liked. the center console was nice, but very small. There is a storage nook just forward of the shift lever, but that’s about it. The 12V outlet is located in a really retarded spot- it’s on the passenger side of the center console, down by their leg! Dumb. The armrest in the second row has a storage nook, two cup holders and a couple of USB ports…Smart! The front center console has an SD card slot (for the nav system, I suppose), and two USB ports, though it seems really cramped in there.

    The front-end styling is really aggressive and you have to see it to appreciate it. Just a beautiful car.

    The subwoofer is actually located in the spare tire in the back; Not sure if I’ve ever seen that before. Despite my best efforts, I don’t think the sound system was all that and a bag of chips. I streamed music from my Note 4 to the car and used Groove to play music. The songs’ title would show, but artist and album would list as ‘unknown’.

    Why, Mazda, do you only auto up/down one window? Sheesh!

    When I put the driver’s window down, I really had to lift my arm to place it on the sill. Either the sill is high or my seat was low. Maybe both.

    The side mirrors, while offering a good view to the rear, do not flip down when reverse is engaged. The rearview camera works perfectly, though it’s a single view system.

    Getting into the third row isn’t that difficult. HOWEVER, every car manufacturer should put in a HANDLE near the forward rear wheel well (make it retractable), to ease ingress and egress. Hell, you can get one of those kinds of handles from an “As seen on TV” store for about $19.

    The car wouldn’t fit my Catrike Expedition- the rear opening was just to small (there’s a sex joke in there…lol). I also don’t think this would be a useable car for traveling with luggage and many people. My 2013 Pilot, my wife and I sit up front, my mom and one son sit in the second row, and my other son sits on the 40% seat, with the 60% seat folded down and 5 suitcases and some smaller bags are laid out in the cargo area. Because of the extreme angle on the back hatch, and the overall smaller size of the 9 compared to the Pilot, my personal traveling scheme won’t work and I would have to resort to a cargo carrier on the top (no effin’ way), or use a hitch-mounted cargo carrier, to carry our stuff, and I do not want that headache. A rear hitch-mounted bike carrier will also be the only way to carry my bike, which bites.

    Finally, there is no power seat memory (at least not on the Grand Touring), or entertainment option available. And the AC seems to be a bit weak. And no ventilated seats.

    So, while the MPGs seem good and the car is an absolute hoot to drive, I’m just going to have to pass on this one.

  • Donna32156

    I make close to $6,000-$8,000 on monthly basis with an online job i found on internet. For anyone willing to complete simple freelance jobs for several h a day at your home and make decent profit in the same time… Then this opportunity is for you… UR1.CA/p7vxa


  • RoyShastid

    You need a dyspepsia mobile. The car should fit the driver.

  • HoKoJoJo

    The major problem for these mid price suv’s is they don’t offer a passenger seat that goes up and down. That’s a deal killer for my wife.

  • Dave

    I have an XC60 R Design which is a wonderful car but we are packed very tight in it when I take my two kids and some grear. I think it’s a shame they didn’t put something like a twin-scroll turbo on this car to give it more top end. The 2.3 in the Explorer makes just as much torque and quite a bit more power so I don’t want to hear about responsiveness. They can do better. The interior is quite nice (agree with the person who disliked the piano black). Seats are quite nice but there is no option to get a larger or second sunroof. The lack of any park sensors up front is inexcusable – this stuff isn’t that expensive. I thought the infotainment was attractive but no carplay/android auto is a full-stop deal breaker for me. Not trading for anything that hasn’t got it. So I suppose overall, another 50 hp and android auto and I’d have bought one. The rest of the car is extremely nice.