2017 Mazda3 vs Honda Civic Hatchback

Two of AutoGuide.com's Favorite Five-Doors go Head-to-Head


There’s little doubt that the small car segment is a shrinking one, though the situation may not be as dire as it seems on the surface.

It’s still responsible for a huge percentage of new car sales in North America each year, proving that not everyone is crazy for crossovers. Sure, it’s given up ground to small CUVs in recent years, a trend that’s likely to continue, but this is a segment still rife with competition. And that’s especially true of the small hatchback subsegment, which has seen a newfound resurgence as of late.

Existing entries like the Mazda3 have been joined by the likes of the five-door Honda Civic as brands look to carve out their respective niches in a segment that caters to many needs. For some it’s all about affordable fun, while for others it’s predicated on practicality. Regardless, there are plenty of reasons to get excited about what this segment has to offer, starting with those aforementioned entries.

Both are new for 2017 — the Civic hatch being all-new, and the Mazda3 receiving a well-deserved refresh — and ready to vie for your hard-earned dollars, bringing with them merits that are each their own. But there can only be one winner in the AutoGuide.com arena, so we put both through their paces in an old-fashioned small-car shootout to see which one reigns supreme.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

A Journey Through Design and Space

The newfound resurgence of the compact hatchback segment has seen automakers like Honda get back in the game after years of neglect. When it comes to the Civic, it’s been about 15 years since it was sold in hatchback form in North America, and even longer since a five-door version like this new one was available. (For the last time such a Civic was sold in this part of the world, you’d have to look back to the late 1980s and the so-called Civic Wagon.)

Honda’s taken some flack about the Civic’s design since this new one was introduced back in 2015, but the brand deserves credit for making its compact car stand out. So many cars look the same nowadays, but the new Civic is refreshing at the very least — something that continues with this hatchback version.

Everything from B-pillar back has been replaced compared to Civic sedan, with the car measuring more than four inches (102 millimeters) shorter overall. Despite that lost length, the Civic hatch is still sizeable, measuring 177.9 inches (4,519 mm) from bumper to bumper. It also boasts a decent amount of room inside, with a similar amount of passenger space to the Civic sedan and a ton more cargo volume.

Compare Specs

2017 Mazda3 5-Door
2017 Honda Civic Hatchback
Vehicle 2017 Mazda3 5-Door Advantage 2017 Honda Civic Hatchback
Engine2.5L 4-cylinder-1.5L turbo 4-cylinder
Horsepower184 hpMazda3174 hp
Torque185 lb-ftMazda3162 lb-ft
Transmission6-speed manual/auto.Mazda36-speed manual; CVT
Cargo Capacity (cu-ft)20.2; 47.1Civic25.7; 46.2
Cargo Capacity (liters)572; 1,334Civic 728; 1,308
US Fuel Economy30 mpg combinedCivic34 mpg combined
CAN Fuel Economy7.9 L/100 km combinedCivic6.9 L/100 km combined
US PriceStarts at $20,145CivicStarts at $19,700
CAN PriceStarts at $19,550Mazda3Starts at $21,490

With 25.7 cu-ft (728 liters) of space behind the back seats, the Civic offers way more cargo room than pretty much everything in the segment, including the Mazda3. Folding the second row opens up 46.2 cu-ft (1,308 liters) of space for stuff, which is plenty. The Honda Civic hatchback also has a handy privacy cover that extends out from either side of the cargo area for easy, one-handed operation. But best of all, the entire assembly is only a little larger than a brick, which means it’s out of the way until needed and won’t be forgotten in the garage.

The 2017 Mazda3, meanwhile, has undergone a far more subtle overhaul. In fact, park this 2017 version next to its pre-facelifted predecessor and only the most acutely aware would be able to spot the differences. Compared to the Civic, the Mazda3 is clearly the safer stylistic bet, though it’s certainly far from unattractive. It retains the same flowing lines as before, with only a few minor tweaks to the front and rear fascias and some new wheel designs rounding out the unassuming exterior changes.

Much like the Civic, the hatchback version of the Mazda3 is shorter than the sedan — in this case, about five inches (127 mm) shorter. At 175 inches (4,445 mm) from tip to tail, the Mazda is among the smallest entries in the segment, and comes in at roughly three inches (76 mm) shorter than the Civic hatch. And while that may seem inconsequential, it puts the Mazda at a clear disadvantage, particularly behind the tailgate.

Room behind the rear seats stands at a paltry 20.2 cu-ft (572 liters), which is near the bottom of the small hatch pack. While still offering more than enough room for everyday errands, weekends away may pose a bit of a problem. The Mazda does, however, strike back with the rear seats folded, with its 47.1 cu-ft (1,334 liters) actually putting it near top of segment, and even slightly better than the Civic. It’s a similar story when it comes to passenger room, with the Mazda3 surrendering some space to the segment’s leaders, though not as much as one might suspect.


Opposing Power Sources

When it comes to their powertrains, the Mazda3 and Civic hatch take divergent paths that reflect their age. As a new kid on the block, the Civic is only available with a turbocharged engine, in this case a 1.5-liter four-cylinder. Output varies depending on transmission, but power is plentiful whether it’s going to the front wheels through manual or automatic transmissions.

The engine churns out 174 horsepower to go with 162 lb-ft of torque in cars equipped with the continuously variable transmission or 167 lb-ft of torque with the six-speed manual. Sport models, meanwhile, get a slight bump in output to 180 horsepower and 177 lb-ft of torque (the same 162 lb-ft is on tap with the CVT). The engine’s full serving of torque kicks in at about 1,800 rpm, providing a decent punch without much room for turbo lag.

When it comes to the Civic’s transmissions, neither are anywhere near the best in the segment. Our tester was fitted with the six-speed manual, which features a feather-light shifter and vague clutch, while the continuously variable automatic has a fair amount of the rubber-banding effect that makes it seem like power’s coming from a pissed-off sewing machine.

ALSO SEE: 2017 Honda Civic Sport Hatchback Review

While the Civic has been caught up in the turbocharging trend, the Mazda3 sticks with natural aspiration to make power. The compact gets the choice of either 2.0- or 2.5-liter engines under hood, both of which offer pretty good output. The smaller of the two four-cylinders makes 155 horsepower and 150 lb-ft of torque, while the the 2.5-liter makes 184 horsepower to go along with 185 lb-ft of torque.

Either engine can be mated to the choice of manual or automatic transmissions, both of which feature six forward gears. Both transmissions are better than the ones offered in the Civic, with far more natural feel — especially in the automatic. Like the one in the Civic, the Mazda’s clutch is soft and light, though it’s surprisingly compliant.

No matter which engine-transmission combo the Mazda3 features, its fuel economy isn’t as good as the Civic’s. With the 2.0-liter under the hood, the Mazda gets the same 31 mpg (7.5 L/100 km) combined regardless of gearbox, while the larger engine combined with the manual does slightly worse at 28 mpg (8.3 L/100 km) and 30 mpg (7.9 L/100 km) with the automatic. The Civic, meanwhile, with its much more modern powertrain, gets fuel economy ratings of 33 mpg (7.2 L/100 km) combined with the manual transmission and 34 mpg (6.9 L/100 km) with the CVT. Our actual fuel economy with both cars was closer to their respective city averages during our testing, though conditions were less than optimal and both were clad in winter tires.


A Better Drive

When it comes to the way the two competitors drive, the Mazda3 comes out on top — especially when it comes to sheer engagement. As part of its update for 2017, Mazda revised the compact’s suspension setup to include new dampers at all four corners. While not exactly wholly different than before, they do a nice job of providing a smooth and quiet ride that errs on the sporty side. The same goes for the tight chassis and nicely weighted steering setup, which both make the Mazda fun to drive when called upon.

The Mazda3 also features a new G-Vectoring Control system that uses engine braking to improve cornering performance. Unlike other automakers’ brake-based systems, Mazda’s G-Vectoring reduces engine torque ever so slightly in response to steering input, shifting more of the car’s weight to the front wheels for improved traction and turn-in response. As the car works through the turn the torque that was put on hold is reengaged, shifting the weight back to the rear wheels for improved stability and corner exit. The whole process happens in a split second and is virtually imperceptible while behind the wheel, but that’s the point.

ALSO SEE: 2017 Mazda3 2.5L Review

The Civic, however, is no slouch either and can be fun to drive while also smoothing uneven roads with ease. Like the Mazda3, the Civic features front MacPherson struts and a multi-link rear suspension. The Civic’s steering, however, isn’t quite as dialed in as the Mazda’s and it doesn’t provide as much feedback, though the brake-based torque-vectoring system works well to improve the car’s cornering ability even if there’s slightly more body roll.

On its own the Civic hatch seems like a fun car to drive, but compared to the Mazda3 it’s sort of sloppy. And that’s why it’s crucial to test drive at least a couple of cars when shopping for a new one. Even for those folks dead-set on a certain model, driving another one or two competitors before buying can help reinforce strengths and, more importantly, identify weaknesses.


Superior Interior

Inside, both the Mazda3 and Honda Civic have good things going for them. While styling is subjective, the Mazda’s cabin features a design that’s a little easier on the eyes thanks to cleaner, more symmetrical lines and a greater array of materials. That story is certainly true in higher trim grades, with the leather in the Mazda feeling more supple and substantial than the stuff used in the Honda.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with the Civic’s cabin, though certain materials aren’t all that nice to the touch — especially on lower grade trims. It is, however, a pretty good package for the price. The Civic hatch starts at $19,700 ($21,490 in Canada), which is slightly more than the Mazda3 hatch though still pretty budget-friendly. That base price doesn’t include a whole lot of desirable features, though they can be added for nominal price increases.

Items like a seven-inch touchscreen infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto capability, for example, comes into play on the Sport grade, which commands only a $1,600 premium over base versions. (Canadian cars, meanwhile, feature that same touch-sensitive screen as standard fare.)

ALSO SEE: 2017 Honda CR-V vs Ford Escape

From there, a whole array of comfort, convenience and — and maybe more importantly — safety features can be added, including heated seats and steering wheel, as well as adaptive cruise control, lane-keep assist and forward collision mitigation braking, among others. Those safety features, which make up the Honda Sensing suite, don’t simply cater to demand, but work as well as those offered in much pricier rides.

Shifting to the Mazda’s interior, it’s a similar story to the Honda’s in terms of feature availability, though it still does without those aforementioned smartphone syncing interfaces. The infotainment system, which runs through a seven-inch unit, sits atop the dash and can be operated through the touch of a finger or the console-mounted controller. The interface itself isn’t quite as modern and fluid as Honda’s and looks slightly more juvenile, though it’s easy to adjust to over time.

Like the Civic, the Mazda3 is available with a full suite of safety features, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keep assist, and forward collision mitigation, all of which work well and offer good value for the money. The safety suite can only be added to the top Grand Touring trim, which command a $4,800 premium over the $20,145 base price ($19,550 in Canada). That price is quite a bit less than the Civic’s peak price of $28,300 ($29,490 in Canada) while offering a better overall atmosphere inside.


The Verdict: 2017 Mazda3 vs Honda Civic Hatchback

There’s a reason the Honda Civic and Mazda3 have proven themselves to be two of our favorite five-doors on the market. Both are practical and fun, but neither will break the bank, with the Mazda doing a slightly better job of saving a few bucks. If it weren’t for the crucially important factors of interior space and infotainment, the Mazda3 would have swept this comparison hands down. The Honda bests it in both of those categories, but it’s just not quite as nice to drive, and that’s what it all boils down to in my books when it comes to commuter-friendly compacts.

The new kid on the block gave the savvy veteran a run for its money in this compact shootout, and while the Mazda3 is beginning to show signs of age, it still has what it takes to hold down the top spot on our list of compact hatchbacks on the market.

  • will wipperdink

    Mazda and Subaru are the two best non premium car companies
    Subaru is number one
    Mazda number two

  • But Honda is always the best!

  • Sorry you feel that way, Phil, though I can assure you that my evaluation was more than an “around the block test drive.” I can also assure you that I’ve never had a buyer who’s in the market for a compact commuter car tell me that quarter-mile times or skid pad results played a role in determining which car they bought. With all due respect to those publications that test for such stats, they aren’t exactly relevant to the average consumer in this segment.

  • Cody Beisel

    Did you know Phil those numbers aren’t the same numbers motortrend tested for the Civic hatch so I have to say stating one source as the only “accurate source” is a far cry. Depends on the condition and the person driving the car. I also feel bias can play a big part on these reviews

  • john heart

    As good as both are the civic has a better manual and a strongrr midrange

  • Phil

    True… but the stats are measurments to determine or compare the cars performance. If no buyers of a plain civic hatch cares about the 1/4 mile time or skid pad score, .. knowing that it accelerates, brakes and turns better than its competitors its a factual way to assess the cars performance as opposed to unmeasured, opinion based, driving impressions.
    its not about using the numbers like they are that of a Ferrari and brag about them, its about using measurements, facts, tangible proof to substantiate and demonstrate the car’s dynamic ability and use stats to establish which cars perform better.

    And yes other sources / websites may get different results and one source isn’t the holy accurate source,.. All the more reasons to have all/other sources perform those tests to compare them to others sites, see who’s biased or see who’s all getting roughly the same numbers and it helps said source substantiate their statements, especially in car comparisons.

  • Jonny_Vancouver

    I gotta agree with Dan, The point is that most of the people who are cross shopping cars in this segment are not looking at those stats. they simply don’t matter to anyone who isn’t driving on a race track. I think it’s ridiculous that a lot of publications have made it such a big deal to list those stats for Every. Single. Car. While it’s nice to know in the back of your mind, those stats are largely useless imo, and are listed, I suspect in an attempt to just sell cars when people should be focusing more on the overall driving experience as is properly reported in the article. You will rarely, if ever push your car to it’s very limits in every day driving. If you do, you should probably have your license taken away. Even still, the ideal track numbers are not going to be near how your car actually performs on the street with the variables of weather, tire choice, road surface, any added weight, obstacles etc. All things being (relatively) equal, on the street, it’s more about the drivers skill anyways.

  • Phil

    You’re missing the point.
    The tests and numbers are there to support, substantiate a reviewer’s claims. Dan claims car A is better dynamically than car B. If car B accelerates, turns and brakes better, with proven stats, then it makes the statement only an opinion not a fact. numbers and results of those tests are the proof used to support your claims. If car B performs better yet someone claims car A is better, then I want facts, numbers, something tangible to prove it. Or else is just an opinion not a fact. by actual facts, tests and measurable data, the Civic brakes, turns and accelerates better while consuming less fuel … thats a fact, not an opinion.
    For example, If reviewer X states car A is quieter than car B but using the instrument that measures decibels proved car B as quieter… a reviewer can say, car A seems quieter, but The tests and numbers are the undeniable proof that car B is quieter despite reviewer X’s opinion
    Data, tests, numbers are tangible proof
    Words like “seems, feel or appear” are opinions not facts. It’s just a matter of backing up your claims.

  • Malik

    Those who are shopping for hatchback should wait for Hyundai i30 aka new Elantra GT. It will be accorded with 1.6L Turbo-charged 201hp along with multi-link rear suspension and more.

  • Malik

    The only reason Subaru might edge Mazda and Honda because of its AWD in place. Its AWD is best in the world.


  • Malik


    Please keep in mind that this is family platform.

  • Your passion for these stats is second to none, Phil. I must confess that I hadn’t read the comparison you referenced until now, and after doing so one line in particular jumped out at me: “Sure, the Honda whupped it on the skidpad and in the slalom, but in the real, eight-tenths world of traffic and guardrails, the Mazda makes time with a confidence that fully masks its humble ­asking price.” Seems to me like I’m not the only one who came to such a conclusion about the Mazda3’s road manners. I’m not denying the value of numbers, but they often don’t tell the whole story. I hope this helps.

  • Phil

    Thanks for your reply Dan, whatever the conclusion may be, my comment is that it would be nice if you guys performed and published instrumental tests and their results to add to your claims. I suggested that to “autoguide” before after reading other reviews as well. My issue isn’t with your conclusions, my issues is that often time you guys make claims and show no data or not much in the way of backing up your claims which by comparaison makes other websites seem more credible as they have stats to support their comments

  • snake

    Not sure how you got an average of 31 mpg on the 2.0 engine. My wife has a 2014 3 touring with the 2.0 automatic and she’s averages 37-38 mpg. Even in the winter time it never goes below 34 mpg.

  • That 31 mpg you’re referring to is the EPA average. Bear in mind that EPA testing changed last year and is now more stringent, leading to slightly worse ratings in many vehicles. It’s also not uncommon, especially when it comes to small cars, for automakers to understate average fuel economy.

  • geezee

    Braking and cornering performance are ” those stats are largely useless imo,” Seriously ?
    This is an article which is concluding which is the better car. Actual DRIVING performance dang well better be a large factor in the decision- not who has a better ‘user-interface’…….. I know, I know, actual ‘driving’ is a lost art in America…. I have been behind many a ‘feature driven purchaser’ fiddling with their ‘user-interfaces’ cruising 65 mph in the left lane of the highway. Or too busy with their ‘user-interfaces’ to bother to signal a lane change or turn…….
    Further, significant weighting should be applied to Honda’s vastly superior reliability and resale value over Mazda. The last Mazda I owned had 10X the repairs my Honda’s had. Well, I should say, my Honda’s DIDN’T have.

  • phil

    yeah didn’t you know? accelerating turing and braking performance don’t matter when comparing cars .. people don’t care about that ..
    it apparently also doesn’t mean much to be roomier, more practical, more fuel efficient, likely more reliable etc.. lol

  • kaffekup

    I agree; I think they’re included so the car magazines, staffed by enthusiasts, will recommend the cars.
    Every time I read “understeer at the limit” or “throttle steer” or “trail braking” for a sedan, I wonder if maybe I should be tracking my 2009 Sonata. 🙂

  • patriotwithabrain

    Phil, if you want a caranddriver review, then go to caranddriver. I like
    to read reviews that tell me numbers AND I like to read reviews that
    tell me real-world feel — it’s useful to get data from multiple
    perspectives. Now, what good would it be for autoguide to copy another
    site? Autoguide has a
    different approach, and you can take or leave it! Many people like it,
    so your advice to do reviews the same way caranddriver does them is
    terrible advice. The world needs variety; not for everything to be the
    same. What’s the point of that? If it doesn’t mean much to you, then
    move along, instead of wasting your time flaming the guy who spent time providing good information for a lot of people!

  • Okc Dave

    WAIT for a NEW Hyundai design? That’s hilarious, unless you’re only getting a short lease vehicle and even then, the Honda may have similar number$.

  • Okc Dave

    No one is burdened with doing something to satisfy you. Realize that. These are not performance cars and a lot of the #s would change by merely choosing different tires.

  • Jonny_Vancouver

    This debate has been awesome. So much passion.

  • phil

    profesional automotive websites like caranddriver, motortrend, even consumer reports etc,.. most all them perform instrumental tests .. and for a reason. without instrumental tests, all you’re getting is the reviewer’s personal opinion .. I already have my own opinion, what I want out of a review or comparison is stats and data demonstrating facts, I can do away with the reviewers personal preferences .. especially when they go against the facts and logic.

    are hockey players solely selected by teams based on the coach’s personal opinions or do they look at the players stats to see how they compare to one another ?

  • garypen

    “…comes in at roughly
    three inches (76 mm) shorter than the Civic hatch. And while that may
    seem inconsequential, it puts the Mazda at a clear disadvantage,
    particularly behind the tailgate.”
    I don’t understand why this is a disadvantage. It is actually an advantage for a compact car. Easier to park. Easier to drive in the city.
    Also, what does “particularly behind the tailgate” mean? Wouldn’t that mean *more* space for parking?

  • ran

    the zoomzoom looks outdated externally, looking at the new honda hatch external is dominating and soon intimidates other car manufacturers. how aggressive the new honda is.

  • CommonSenseAlGuy

    Should have tested the Civic Hatchback Sport.

  • WJ Clinton

    0-60 in 9.4 seconds killed the Impreza for me. Phil isn’t the only one who cares about performance from a commuter. If I can’t safely merge onto the freeway that car is a non-starter.

  • WJ Clinton

    Kind of late to the party here but I’d like to agree with Phil. The numbers can’t be the sole metric by which a car is judged, but the Impreza is a perfect example. Clean exterior, decent interior, AWD for the snow while getting fantastic fuel economy. The problem is it’s 9.4 0-60. Not because we will track the car, but we want to know how it will treat us in the real world. My commute every single day includes a short uphill run up to 70 mph freeway traffic. The difference between a 6.6 0-60 and a 9.4 0-60 (Civic EX-t vs Impreza) means in one car I’m white knuckling the merge, in the other it’s safe and non-dramatic. Performance isn’t everything, but 40-70 and 5-60 numbers are not unimportant.

  • Gilles Thibault

    Canadian-Spec Civic Sport Touring with 6-speed Manual transmission! Mike drop.
    (Mazdas are too prone to corrosion here in Canada – Trust me!)