2015 Subaru Legacy 3.6R Vs Chrysler 200S

Mike Schlee
by Mike Schlee

For years, anyone in search of a mainstream all-wheel drive family sedan only had one solution: the Subaru Legacy.

Even then, the Legacy wasn’t exactly mainstream with its symmetrical AWD, boxer engines and high-riding Outback variants. But over the years the Legacy crept closer and closer to being a “normal” family sedan in the quest of higher sales.

At the same time, other mid-size sedans started to get closer to the Legacy. In 2012 Ford started offering an all-wheel drive option on the Fusion, paired to the company’s 2.0-liter EcoBoost engine. Chrysler also dabbled with all-wheel drive versions of the Sebring sedan, but never seemed serious about making a big splash in this sub-segment of family sedans. That is, until now.

Legacy and 200 Saunter Towards the Mainstream

Get the Flash Player to see this player.


Completely reborn for the 2015 model year, the Chrysler 200 features seductive new sheet metal built on a stretched version of the Dodge Dart platform. Power comes from a 184-HP four-cylinder engine or an optional 295-HP 3.6-liter V6. But the big news for the 2015 200 has to do with what comes after the engine. All models get a brand-new nine-speed automatic transmission while V6 models can also be had with all-wheel drive.

SEE ALSO: 2015 Chrysler 200S Review

Not about to be outshone in a segment it owned for decades, Subaru introduced an all-new version of the Legacy this year as well. Unlike the 200, the Legacy is less of a revolution in design. Although the exterior and interior have been thoroughly updated, the car’s mechanics are essentially carryover items with one exception; six-cylinder models ditch the five-speed automatic transmission and adopt a chain-drive continuously variable (CVT).

The 3.6-liter “Boxer” six-cylinder engine still makes 256 HP and 247 lb-ft. of torque. That is significantly less power than the 200S produces, but in a straight line it doesn’t feel like it. Weighing about 150 lbs. less than the AWD 200S, the Legacy’s CVT keeps the engine in the power band at all times to maximize performance. In a straight line contest the 200S would easily beat the Legacy, but the nine-speed automatic in the Chrysler makes the car feel slower than it really is.

CVT vs. Nine-Speeds

Quiet and efficient, the nine-speed needs more development work. At low speeds, it trips up on itself and hesitates before upshifting. Juddering and jiggling are present during stop-and-go traffic and downshifts for highway passing maneuvers are downright painful as the transmission leisurely works its way through each gear on its way to a proper passing ratio. Basically, the Subaru’s CVT is one of the best gearless transmissions on the market whereas the technological marvel that is the Chrysler nine-speed is not a very good automatic.

But, even with less power and an ultra-efficient CVT, the Legacy couldn’t match the 200S in our real world fuel economy testing when equipped with six-cylinder engines. Despite being rated slight higher at 20 MPG city and 29 MPG highway compared to the 200S’ ratings of 18 MPG city and 29 MPG highway, the Chrysler edged out the Subaru with a return of 25.9 MPG compared to 25.3 MPG.

Full-Time AWD vs. Part-Time AWD

Part of the fuel discrepancy could be attributed to the respective AWD systems. The Legacy continues on with Subaru’s full-time, active-torque split AWD that sees power sent front and rear at all times. The 200S on the other hand will decouple the rear-axle in order to reduce parasitic loss and improve fuel economy during regular driving conditions. When needed though, the car will send up to 60 percent of the power to the rear wheels. AWD purists will despise this slip and grip system, but unless living on a greasy, muddy mountain, Subaru’s AWD system is overkill for the majority of driving situations.

Neither of the cars are sporty to drive, nor should they be. Designed for everyday drivers, the Legacy holds the edge here with better sightlines, a seamless transmission and low-effort driving controls. It’s very easy to get behind the wheel of the Subaru and feel instantly comfortable.

Conservative vs. Stylish

Subaru has been working hard on improving its interiors and it shows. Still not a class leader, the 2015 Legacy has much nicer materials inside now and better overall design, including an infotainment unit that is actually integrated into the center console. Compared to the 200’s interior though and the Legacy looks conservative and boring.

More modern and stylish, Chrysler did a done a good job inside the new 200S. That’s not to say everything is perfect as a few questionable styling elements snuck into the generation family sedan like blue-tinted wood-trim and captain-obvious labelling of the speedometer and tachometer.

SEE ALSO: 2015 Subaru Legacy Review

The Legacy’s front seats edge out the 200S’ due to the inclusion of a mesh-like insert in the Chrysler that isn’t attractive at all. Rear seat space also favors the Subaru with 38.1-inches of rear legroom on hand, half an inch more than in the 200S. More importantly, since the Legacy has more of a square exterior shape, real world passenger comfort trumps the Chrysler as head room is sorely lacking in the back of the 200S.

When it comes to the exterior of the two cars, there is no contest. Although much improved and contemporary looking, the Legacy cannot match the 200S when it comes to style. High-tech LED lights highlight the front and rear of the car, while S models like our tester have a darker, more sinister look thanks to glossy black trim and accent pieces as well as bumper-integrated exhaust tips. Chrysler probably has the best looking mid-size sedan on the market. When’s the last time that could be said?

Compare Specs

2015 Chrysler 200S AWD
vs
2015 Subaru Legacy Limited 3.6R
Vehicle 2015 Chrysler 200S AWD Advantage 2015 Subaru Legacy Limited 3.6R
Engine 3.6 L Six-Cylinder - 3.6 L Six-Cylinder
Horsepower 295 hp 200S 256 hp
Max. Torque 262 lb-ft 200S 247 lb-ft
Fuel Economy 18 MPG city / 29 MPG hwy Legacy 20 MPG city / 29 MPG hwy
Observed MPG 25.9 mpg 200S 25.3 mpg
Weight 3,795 lbs. Legacy 3,662 lbs.
Front Legroom 42.2” Legacy 42.9”
Rear Legroom 37.6” Legacy 38.7”
Rear Cargo Capacity 16.0 cu. ft. 200S 15.0 cu. ft.
Starting Price $22,695 - $22,490
As Tested Price $35,360 Legacy $33,380

A Question of Value

And that brings us to the question of value. Both cars start within spitting distance of each other as a base Legacy commands $22,490 after destination charges compared to the 200’s entry price of $22,695. Step up to the high-end of the model hierarchy though and things begin to separate.

A fully loaded Legacy 3.6R Limited comes equipped with Subaru’s Eye Sight crash detection and adaptive cruise control system, for a final bill of $33,380. Ringing in at $35,560, the loaded up 200S ups the ante with a panoramic sunroof, but is not available with adaptive cruise as the 200C model must be selected that not only costs more money, but also loses some of the 200S’ style.

The Verdict

The new Chrysler 200 is a quantum leap ahead of the old model and offers so much style, power and technology compared to the old 200, it probably deserved a new model name. The problem is, the car isn’t quite refined enough to compete in the near luxury class against the likes of the Acura TLX or Volvo S60, yet it’s too stylistically compromised to compete as a proper family friendly mid-size sedan.

On the other hand, the new Legacy is basically an all-wheel drive Honda Accord, which is a big complement to the Subaru sedan. It does everything right in a family friendly vehicle, while remaining anonymous and inoffensive. And when the weather turns nasty, the Legacy is more than ready to tackle the worst Mother Nature can throw at it.

2015 Chrysler 200S, 2015 Subaru Legacy Limited 3.6R

LOVE IT

  • Style
  • Efficient
  • Power
  • Transmission
  • Easy to drive
  • Spacious

LEAVE IT

  • Transmission
  • Rear seat space
  • Some interior finishes
  • Engine
  • Too conservative
Mike Schlee
Mike Schlee

A 20+ year industry veteran, Mike rejoins the AutoGuide team as the Managing Editor. He started his career at a young age working at dealerships, car rentals, and used car advertisers. He then found his true passion, automotive writing. After contributing to multiple websites for several years, he spent the next six years working at the head office of an automotive OEM, before returning back to the field he loves. He is a member of the Automobile Journalists Association of Canada (AJAC), and Midwest Automotive Media Association (MAMA). He's the recipient of a feature writing of the year award and multiple video of the year awards.

More by Mike Schlee

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • Bena fein Bena fein on Dec 13, 2014

    disgusting. 25 mpg avg. You people must long for 1992. Grow up.

  • Brendan McCormick Brendan McCormick on Oct 17, 2016

    I have always been a Subaru lover. At one point I saved up enough CASH to straight purchase a 2006 Subaru STi, but declined to make the order after hitting a deer and thinking that I would NEVER live with myself if I destroyed an STi. Many years later I was CONNED into test driving a 200S and I wasn't even looking to buy a car. Within a few months I sold everything I had and purchased a 2015 200S. It is the only car I've EVER purchased brand new and I really enjoy driving it. If I had to find something that I don't like is headroom with the sunroof. I have to recline so far that the steering wheel is too far away. The 200S goes like the beans and no one notices me, so it is a wonderful sleeper. I'm happy with the fuel economy and even the interior style. I don't find myself in love with Subaru quite as much, but I also admit that the 200S is not quite as serious off-road, but I have done enough sideways driving on gravel to know that it will do it and happily. Can you fairly compare two cars? Everything is a give and take. There are compromises, so you can't, without a clearly defined criteria to judge by. The Subaru is a better car under some criteria and the 200S is better under others. I'm happy with the 200S and I was NOT interested in US cars, but after being tricked - I'm happy. I did find one for over $10K under MSRP and that had EVERYTHING to do with even allowing me to purchase a new 200S at all and might have something to do with how much I like it... I think I would still have bought it at $35K though I would've chosen a different color than Velvet Red.

Next