The family sedan segment is full of safe choices.
The Honda Accord and Toyota Camry are solid yet unadventurous picks, but for people who want something a bit different, there are other comparable yet not as popular family sedans that have a lot to offer. The 2016 Kia Optima and Volkswagen Passat are two of these picks.
These two sedans seem to be forgotten cars in their segment, but they are both solid alternatives to the more mainstream picks. They are both good at different things and appeal to two very different types of buyers, but have their outsider status in common.
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
Starting in the Style Department
Put side by side, it’s obvious that the Kia wins in the style category. A more modern-looking sedan, the Optima’s high beltline and sculpted front end makes the car look more dramatic. In comparison, the Passat’s look is quite bland, though it is not ugly.
And that style carries over to the inside as well. The Kia’s quilted leather seats, brushed aluminum trim, and flat-bottomed, dimpled leather steering wheel really makes the interior look upscale. The Passat’s interior design, on the other hand, while luxurious and classy, gives off some old man vibes. The wood trim, analog clock, and typical VW styling really make this interior look uninspired in comparison. The Kia’s interior is more visually interesting and more youthful.
How Do the Drives Compare?
Again, this young versus old theme repeats itself in the driving dynamics of both sedans. The Optima’s steering is much more heavy and direct, where the Passat’s steering has a dead zone in the middle, so it doesn’t have a solid on-center feel and isn’t as responsive. The Optima also has selectable driving modes and aluminum pedals, two things that emphasize the focus on driving.
The Optima is powered by a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that makes 245 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque, which comes online early at 1,300 rpm.
The Passat, on the other hand, is motivated by VW’s ubiquitous and award-winning turbocharged 1.8-liter four-cylinder with 170 hp and 184 lb-ft or torque. If you did want to match the Optima’s numbers, you would have to upgrade to the 3.6-liter V6, which puts out 280 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque.
There is a big power disparity between the two sedans on paper, but on the road, the difference doesn’t feel that drastic. The 1.8L turbo is well-suited to the Passat, and even though it seems like such a small engine for a car this size, its performance is decent and it doesn’t feel any slower than the Kia, probably because the Passat is a couple hundred pounds lighter. The Passat is also much more fuel efficient, with the VW rated at 32.6 mpg while the Optima gets 27.6 mpg. I prefer the VW engine because performance feels comparable to the Kia’s, but is much more fuel efficient and feels more refined.
|Vehicle||Kia Optima||Advantage||Volkswagen Passat|
|Engine||2.0L turbo 4-cylinder||-||1.8L turbo 4-cylinder|
|Horsepower||245 HP||Optima||170 HP|
|Torque||260 lb-ft||Optima||184 lb-ft|
|Transmission||6-Speed Automatic||-||6-Speed Automatic|
|Weight||3,594 lbs||Passat||3,263 lbs|
|Rear Legroom||35.6 inches||Passat||39.1 inches|
|Trunk room||15.9 cubic feet||-||15.9 cubic feet|
|Fuel Economy (US)||22 MPG city, 32 MPG hwy||Passat||25 MPG city, 38 MPG hwy|
|Starting Price (US)||$21,990||Optima||$22,440|
|Starting Price (CDN)||$23,495||Passat||$23,295|
|As Tested Price (US)||$36,740||Passat||$35,090|
|As Tested Price (CDN)||$37,596||Passat||$33,795|
Comfort, Practicality, and Value
One of the first things you notice driving the Passat after the Optima is how much quieter the cabin is. The Passat is like a vault inside, with barely any wind, road or engine noise making its way into the cabin. It’s also much softer sprung than the Kia, so it is smoother and more comfortable when driving over rough roads. The Kia’s ride is harsher, but that also means it stays flatter in the corners.
The Kia officially has more passenger volume, and head, shoulder and leg room in the front seats. The Passat has a roomier rear seat, however, and the trunk looks bigger, but they measure out at an equal 15.9 cubic feet. Features-wise, the two are pretty well matched for the price, but the Kia has a few features the VW doesn’t come with like a 360-degree camera, ventilated seats, heated seats in the back and a huge panoramic sunroof. The VW is, however, less expensive and offers self-parking feature, but the Kia has it beat in terms of features.
The Verdict: 2016 Kia Optima vs Volkswagen Passat
The Kia Optima and the Volkswagen Passat definitely aren’t the first cars that pop into your mind when you think of mid-sized family sedans, but they both have more than a few redeeming factors that make them worth mentioning in the same breath as the top dogs in its class.
If you’re looking for a spacious, smooth and quiet car, then the Passat is perfect. It feels more mature and more geared toward an executive who wants a comfortable car, but it does blend in to the background.
But if what you want is something that stands out and has a sportier feel, the Kia is the better pick. The Optima has a better drive, a more exciting interior, and feels more youthful. You won’t get old man vibes driving the Kia, and it definitely makes a bolder statement.